Message ID | 20190718192940.16103-2-nathanl@linux.ibm.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | more migration vs CPU hotplug fixes | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
snowpatch_ozlabs/apply_patch | success | Successfully applied on branch next (f5c20693d8edcd665f1159dc941b9e7f87c17647) |
snowpatch_ozlabs/checkpatch | warning | total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 checks, 35 lines checked |
Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com> writes: > During LPAR migration, cpu hotplug and migration operations can > interleave like so: > > cd /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu7/ | drmgr -m -c pmig -p pre \ > echo 0 > online | -s 0xd7a884f83d830e6d -t 19 \ > echo 1 > online | -n -d 1 5 > ---------------------------------+------------------------------------------- > online_store() { | > device_offline() { | > cpu_subsys_offline() { | > cpu_down(7); | > } | > dev->offline = true; | > } | migration_store() { > } | rtas_ibm_suspend_me() { > | rtas_online_cpus_mask() { > | cpu_up(7); > | } > | cpu_hotplug_disable(); > | on_each_cpu(rtas_percpu_suspend_me()); > | cpu_hotplug_enable(); > online_store() { | > device_online() { | > cpu_subsys_online() { | > cpu_up(7); | > } | > dev->offline = false; | > } | rtas_offline_cpus_mask() { > } | rtas_cpu_state_change_mask() { > | cpu_down(7); > | } > | } > | } > | } Actually I think this isn't a correct depiction of the race. I'll rewrite and resend.
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c index 9b4d2a2ffb4f..fbefd9ff6dab 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c @@ -875,15 +875,17 @@ static int rtas_cpu_state_change_mask(enum rtas_cpu_state state, return 0; for_each_cpu(cpu, cpus) { + struct device *dev = get_cpu_device(cpu); + switch (state) { case DOWN: - cpuret = cpu_down(cpu); + cpuret = device_offline(dev); break; case UP: - cpuret = cpu_up(cpu); + cpuret = device_online(dev); break; } - if (cpuret) { + if (cpuret < 0) { pr_debug("%s: cpu_%s for cpu#%d returned %d.\n", __func__, ((state == UP) ? "up" : "down"), @@ -972,6 +974,8 @@ int rtas_ibm_suspend_me(u64 handle) data.token = rtas_token("ibm,suspend-me"); data.complete = &done; + lock_device_hotplug(); + /* All present CPUs must be online */ cpumask_andnot(offline_mask, cpu_present_mask, cpu_online_mask); cpuret = rtas_online_cpus_mask(offline_mask); @@ -1011,6 +1015,7 @@ int rtas_ibm_suspend_me(u64 handle) __func__); out: + unlock_device_hotplug(); free_cpumask_var(offline_mask); return atomic_read(&data.error); }
During LPAR migration, cpu hotplug and migration operations can interleave like so: cd /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu7/ | drmgr -m -c pmig -p pre \ echo 0 > online | -s 0xd7a884f83d830e6d -t 19 \ echo 1 > online | -n -d 1 5 ---------------------------------+------------------------------------------- online_store() { | device_offline() { | cpu_subsys_offline() { | cpu_down(7); | } | dev->offline = true; | } | migration_store() { } | rtas_ibm_suspend_me() { | rtas_online_cpus_mask() { | cpu_up(7); | } | cpu_hotplug_disable(); | on_each_cpu(rtas_percpu_suspend_me()); | cpu_hotplug_enable(); online_store() { | device_online() { | cpu_subsys_online() { | cpu_up(7); | } | dev->offline = false; | } | rtas_offline_cpus_mask() { } | rtas_cpu_state_change_mask() { | cpu_down(7); | } | } | } | } This leaves cpu7 in a state where the driver core considers the cpu device online, but in all other respects it is offline and unused. Attempts to online the cpu via sysfs appear to succeed but the driver core actually does not pass the request to the lower-level cpuhp support code. This makes the cpu unusable until the system is rebooted. Instead of directly calling cpu_up/cpu_down, the migration code should use the higher-level device core APIs to maintain consistent state and serialize operations. Fixes: 120496ac2d2d ("powerpc: Bring all threads online prior to migration/hibernation") Signed-off-by: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com> --- arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c | 11 ++++++++--- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)