diff mbox series

ASoC: fsl_asrc: Add initialization finishing check in runtime resume

Message ID 1662373788-19561-1-git-send-email-shengjiu.wang@nxp.com (mailing list archive)
State Handled Elsewhere
Headers show
Series ASoC: fsl_asrc: Add initialization finishing check in runtime resume | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
snowpatch_ozlabs/github-powerpc_sparse success Successfully ran 4 jobs.
snowpatch_ozlabs/github-powerpc_clang success Successfully ran 6 jobs.
snowpatch_ozlabs/github-powerpc_kernel_qemu success Successfully ran 23 jobs.

Commit Message

Shengjiu Wang Sept. 5, 2022, 10:29 a.m. UTC
If the initialization is not finished, then filling input data to
the FIFO may fail. So it is better to add initialization finishing
check in the runtime resume for suspend & resume case.

And consider the case of three instances working in parallel,
increase the retry times to 50 for more initialization time.

Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
---
 sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Nicolin Chen Sept. 5, 2022, 1:15 p.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 3:47 AM Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com> wrote:
> @@ -1295,6 +1301,17 @@ static int fsl_asrc_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
>         regmap_update_bits(asrc->regmap, REG_ASRCTR,
>                            ASRCTR_ASRCEi_ALL_MASK, asrctr);
>
> +       /* Wait for status of initialization for every enabled pairs */
> +       do {
> +               udelay(5);
> +               regmap_read(asrc->regmap, REG_ASRCFG, &reg);
> +               reg = (reg >> ASRCFG_INIRQi_SHIFT(0)) & 0x7;
> +       } while ((reg != ((asrctr >> ASRCTR_ASRCEi_SHIFT(0)) & 0x7)) && --retry);
> +
> +       /* FIXME: Doesn't treat initialization timeout as error */
> +       if (!retry)
> +               dev_warn(dev, "initialization isn't finished\n");

Any reason why not just dev_err?
Shengjiu Wang Sept. 6, 2022, 1:54 a.m. UTC | #2
On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 9:15 PM Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 3:47 AM Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
> wrote:
> > @@ -1295,6 +1301,17 @@ static int fsl_asrc_runtime_resume(struct device
> *dev)
> >         regmap_update_bits(asrc->regmap, REG_ASRCTR,
> >                            ASRCTR_ASRCEi_ALL_MASK, asrctr);
> >
> > +       /* Wait for status of initialization for every enabled pairs */
> > +       do {
> > +               udelay(5);
> > +               regmap_read(asrc->regmap, REG_ASRCFG, &reg);
> > +               reg = (reg >> ASRCFG_INIRQi_SHIFT(0)) & 0x7;
> > +       } while ((reg != ((asrctr >> ASRCTR_ASRCEi_SHIFT(0)) & 0x7)) &&
> --retry);
> > +
> > +       /* FIXME: Doesn't treat initialization timeout as error */
> > +       if (!retry)
> > +               dev_warn(dev, "initialization isn't finished\n");
>
> Any reason why not just dev_err?


Just hesitate to use dev_err. if use dev_err, then should return an error.
May one of the pairs is finished, it still can continue.

Best regards
Wang Shengjiu
Nicolin Chen Sept. 6, 2022, 9:50 a.m. UTC | #3
On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 6:54 PM Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@gmail.com> wrote:

>> > +       /* Wait for status of initialization for every enabled pairs */
>> > +       do {
>> > +               udelay(5);
>> > +               regmap_read(asrc->regmap, REG_ASRCFG, &reg);
>> > +               reg = (reg >> ASRCFG_INIRQi_SHIFT(0)) & 0x7;
>> > +       } while ((reg != ((asrctr >> ASRCTR_ASRCEi_SHIFT(0)) & 0x7)) && --retry);
>> > +
>> > +       /* FIXME: Doesn't treat initialization timeout as error */
>> > +       if (!retry)
>> > +               dev_warn(dev, "initialization isn't finished\n");
>>
>> Any reason why not just dev_err?
>
> Just hesitate to use dev_err. if use dev_err, then should return an error.
> May one of the pairs is finished, it still can continue.

Makes sense. In that case, why "FIXME" :)
Shengjiu Wang Sept. 6, 2022, 10:50 a.m. UTC | #4
On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 5:50 PM Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 6:54 PM Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >> > +       /* Wait for status of initialization for every enabled pairs
> */
> >> > +       do {
> >> > +               udelay(5);
> >> > +               regmap_read(asrc->regmap, REG_ASRCFG, &reg);
> >> > +               reg = (reg >> ASRCFG_INIRQi_SHIFT(0)) & 0x7;
> >> > +       } while ((reg != ((asrctr >> ASRCTR_ASRCEi_SHIFT(0)) & 0x7))
> && --retry);
> >> > +
> >> > +       /* FIXME: Doesn't treat initialization timeout as error */
> >> > +       if (!retry)
> >> > +               dev_warn(dev, "initialization isn't finished\n");
> >>
> >> Any reason why not just dev_err?
> >
> > Just hesitate to use dev_err. if use dev_err, then should return an
> error.
> > May one of the pairs is finished, it still can continue.
>
> Makes sense. In that case, why "FIXME" :)
>

Just want to have a record/note here, need to care about this warning.

Best regards
Wang shengjiu
Nicolin Chen Sept. 6, 2022, 11:41 a.m. UTC | #5
On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 3:50 AM Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > +       /* Wait for status of initialization for every enabled pairs */
>> >> > +       do {
>> >> > +               udelay(5);
>> >> > +               regmap_read(asrc->regmap, REG_ASRCFG, &reg);
>> >> > +               reg = (reg >> ASRCFG_INIRQi_SHIFT(0)) & 0x7;
>> >> > +       } while ((reg != ((asrctr >> ASRCTR_ASRCEi_SHIFT(0)) & 0x7)) && --retry);
>> >> > +
>> >> > +       /* FIXME: Doesn't treat initialization timeout as error */
>> >> > +       if (!retry)
>> >> > +               dev_warn(dev, "initialization isn't finished\n");
>> >>
>> >> Any reason why not just dev_err?
>> >
>> > Just hesitate to use dev_err. if use dev_err, then should return an error.
>> > May one of the pairs is finished, it still can continue.
>>
>> Makes sense. In that case, why "FIXME" :)

> Just want to have a record/note here, need to care about this warning.

"FIXME" feels like something is wrong and literally means that it is
waiting for a fix/solution. In your case, it's not waiting for a fix
at all, but just an annotation? So, shouldn't it be just "Note:"?
Shengjiu Wang Sept. 6, 2022, 1:55 p.m. UTC | #6
On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 7:42 PM Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 3:50 AM Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >> > +       /* Wait for status of initialization for every enabled
> pairs */
> >> >> > +       do {
> >> >> > +               udelay(5);
> >> >> > +               regmap_read(asrc->regmap, REG_ASRCFG, &reg);
> >> >> > +               reg = (reg >> ASRCFG_INIRQi_SHIFT(0)) & 0x7;
> >> >> > +       } while ((reg != ((asrctr >> ASRCTR_ASRCEi_SHIFT(0)) &
> 0x7)) && --retry);
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +       /* FIXME: Doesn't treat initialization timeout as error */
> >> >> > +       if (!retry)
> >> >> > +               dev_warn(dev, "initialization isn't finished\n");
> >> >>
> >> >> Any reason why not just dev_err?
> >> >
> >> > Just hesitate to use dev_err. if use dev_err, then should return an
> error.
> >> > May one of the pairs is finished, it still can continue.
> >>
> >> Makes sense. In that case, why "FIXME" :)
>
> > Just want to have a record/note here, need to care about this warning.
>
> "FIXME" feels like something is wrong and literally means that it is
> waiting for a fix/solution. In your case, it's not waiting for a fix
> at all, but just an annotation? So, shouldn't it be just "Note:"?
>

ok, let me update it.

best regards
wang shengjiu
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c
index aa5edf32d988..bae263b90ac1 100644
--- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c
+++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ 
 
 #define IDEAL_RATIO_DECIMAL_DEPTH 26
 #define DIVIDER_NUM  64
+#define INIT_TRY_NUM 50
 
 #define pair_err(fmt, ...) \
 	dev_err(&asrc->pdev->dev, "Pair %c: " fmt, 'A' + index, ##__VA_ARGS__)
@@ -579,7 +580,7 @@  static void fsl_asrc_start_pair(struct fsl_asrc_pair *pair)
 {
 	struct fsl_asrc *asrc = pair->asrc;
 	enum asrc_pair_index index = pair->index;
-	int reg, retry = 10, i;
+	int reg, retry = INIT_TRY_NUM, i;
 
 	/* Enable the current pair */
 	regmap_update_bits(asrc->regmap, REG_ASRCTR,
@@ -592,6 +593,10 @@  static void fsl_asrc_start_pair(struct fsl_asrc_pair *pair)
 		reg &= ASRCFG_INIRQi_MASK(index);
 	} while (!reg && --retry);
 
+	/* FIXME: Doesn't treat initialization timeout as error */
+	if (!retry)
+		dev_warn(&asrc->pdev->dev, "initialization isn't finished\n");
+
 	/* Make the input fifo to ASRC STALL level */
 	regmap_read(asrc->regmap, REG_ASRCNCR, &reg);
 	for (i = 0; i < pair->channels * 4; i++)
@@ -1257,6 +1262,7 @@  static int fsl_asrc_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct fsl_asrc *asrc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
 	struct fsl_asrc_priv *asrc_priv = asrc->private;
+	int reg, retry = INIT_TRY_NUM;
 	int i, ret;
 	u32 asrctr;
 
@@ -1295,6 +1301,17 @@  static int fsl_asrc_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
 	regmap_update_bits(asrc->regmap, REG_ASRCTR,
 			   ASRCTR_ASRCEi_ALL_MASK, asrctr);
 
+	/* Wait for status of initialization for every enabled pairs */
+	do {
+		udelay(5);
+		regmap_read(asrc->regmap, REG_ASRCFG, &reg);
+		reg = (reg >> ASRCFG_INIRQi_SHIFT(0)) & 0x7;
+	} while ((reg != ((asrctr >> ASRCTR_ASRCEi_SHIFT(0)) & 0x7)) && --retry);
+
+	/* FIXME: Doesn't treat initialization timeout as error */
+	if (!retry)
+		dev_warn(dev, "initialization isn't finished\n");
+
 	return 0;
 
 disable_asrck_clk: