diff mbox

[v8,37/45] powerpc/powernv: Use firmware PCI slot reset infrastructure

Message ID 1455680668-23298-38-git-send-email-gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Headers show

Commit Message

Gavin Shan Feb. 17, 2016, 3:44 a.m. UTC
The skiboot firmware might provide the PCI slot reset capability
which is identified by property "ibm,reset-by-firmware" on the
PCI slot associated device node.

This checks the property. If it exists, the reset request is routed
to firmware. Otherwise, the reset is done by kernel as before.

Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Alexey Kardashevskiy April 19, 2016, 9:34 a.m. UTC | #1
On 02/17/2016 02:44 PM, Gavin Shan wrote:
> The skiboot firmware might provide the PCI slot reset capability
> which is identified by property "ibm,reset-by-firmware" on the
> PCI slot associated device node.
>
> This checks the property. If it exists, the reset request is routed
> to firmware. Otherwise, the reset is done by kernel as before.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>   arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>   1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
> index e23b063..c8a5217 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
> @@ -789,7 +789,7 @@ static int pnv_eeh_root_reset(struct pci_controller *hose, int option)
>   	return ret;
>   }
>
> -static int pnv_eeh_bridge_reset(struct pci_dev *dev, int option)
> +static int __pnv_eeh_bridge_reset(struct pci_dev *dev, int option)
>   {
>   	struct pci_dn *pdn = pci_get_pdn_by_devfn(dev->bus, dev->devfn);
>   	struct eeh_dev *edev = pdn_to_eeh_dev(pdn);
> @@ -840,6 +840,45 @@ static int pnv_eeh_bridge_reset(struct pci_dev *dev, int option)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>
> +static int pnv_eeh_bridge_reset(struct pci_dev *pdev, int option)
> +{
> +	struct pci_controller *hose;
> +	struct pnv_phb *phb;
> +	struct device_node *dn = pdev ? pci_device_to_OF_node(pdev) : NULL;
> +	uint64_t id = (0x1ul << 60);


What is this 1<<60 for?


> +	uint8_t scope;
> +	int64_t rc;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If the firmware can't handle it, we will issue hot reset
> +	 * on the secondary bus despite the requested reset type.
> +	 */
> +	if (!dn || !of_get_property(dn, "ibm,reset-by-firmware", NULL))
> +		return __pnv_eeh_bridge_reset(pdev, option);
> +
> +	/* The firmware can handle the request */
> +	switch (option) {
> +	case EEH_RESET_HOT:
> +		scope = OPAL_RESET_PCI_HOT;
> +		break;
> +	case EEH_RESET_FUNDAMENTAL:
> +		scope = OPAL_RESET_PCI_FUNDAMENTAL;
> +		break;
> +	case EEH_RESET_DEACTIVATE:
> +		return 0;
> +	default:
> +		dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "%s: Unsupported reset %d\n",
> +			 __func__, option);


Can the userspace trigger this case (via VFIO-EEH) and flood dmesg?



> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	hose = pci_bus_to_host(pdev->bus);
> +	phb = hose->private_data;
> +	id |= (pdev->bus->number << 24) | (pdev->devfn << 16) | phb->opal_id;
> +	rc = opal_pci_reset(id, scope, OPAL_ASSERT_RESET);
> +	return pnv_pci_poll(id, rc, NULL);
> +}
> +
>   static int pnv_pci_dev_reset_type(struct pci_dev *pdev, void *data)
>   {
>   	int *freset = data;
>
Gavin Shan April 20, 2016, 2:33 a.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 07:34:55PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>On 02/17/2016 02:44 PM, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>The skiboot firmware might provide the PCI slot reset capability
>>which is identified by property "ibm,reset-by-firmware" on the
>>PCI slot associated device node.
>>
>>This checks the property. If it exists, the reset request is routed
>>to firmware. Otherwise, the reset is done by kernel as before.
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>---
>>  arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
>>index e23b063..c8a5217 100644
>>--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
>>+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
>>@@ -789,7 +789,7 @@ static int pnv_eeh_root_reset(struct pci_controller *hose, int option)
>>  	return ret;
>>  }
>>
>>-static int pnv_eeh_bridge_reset(struct pci_dev *dev, int option)
>>+static int __pnv_eeh_bridge_reset(struct pci_dev *dev, int option)
>>  {
>>  	struct pci_dn *pdn = pci_get_pdn_by_devfn(dev->bus, dev->devfn);
>>  	struct eeh_dev *edev = pdn_to_eeh_dev(pdn);
>>@@ -840,6 +840,45 @@ static int pnv_eeh_bridge_reset(struct pci_dev *dev, int option)
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>>
>>+static int pnv_eeh_bridge_reset(struct pci_dev *pdev, int option)
>>+{
>>+	struct pci_controller *hose;
>>+	struct pnv_phb *phb;
>>+	struct device_node *dn = pdev ? pci_device_to_OF_node(pdev) : NULL;
>>+	uint64_t id = (0x1ul << 60);
>
>
>What is this 1<<60 for?
>
>

As you replied in other threads, it's worthy to have some macros for this
piece of business. This bit indicates the ID of the slot behind a switch
port. If this bit is cleared, the ID represents a PHB slot.

>>+	uint8_t scope;
>>+	int64_t rc;
>>+
>>+	/*
>>+	 * If the firmware can't handle it, we will issue hot reset
>>+	 * on the secondary bus despite the requested reset type.
>>+	 */
>>+	if (!dn || !of_get_property(dn, "ibm,reset-by-firmware", NULL))
>>+		return __pnv_eeh_bridge_reset(pdev, option);
>>+
>>+	/* The firmware can handle the request */
>>+	switch (option) {
>>+	case EEH_RESET_HOT:
>>+		scope = OPAL_RESET_PCI_HOT;
>>+		break;
>>+	case EEH_RESET_FUNDAMENTAL:
>>+		scope = OPAL_RESET_PCI_FUNDAMENTAL;
>>+		break;
>>+	case EEH_RESET_DEACTIVATE:
>>+		return 0;
>>+	default:
>>+		dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "%s: Unsupported reset %d\n",
>>+			 __func__, option);
>
>
>Can the userspace trigger this case (via VFIO-EEH) and flood dmesg?
>

It depends on how you defined message flooding actually. It's abnormal
path caused by program internal error, not external users.

>
>
>>+		return -EINVAL;
>>+	}
>>+
>>+	hose = pci_bus_to_host(pdev->bus);
>>+	phb = hose->private_data;
>>+	id |= (pdev->bus->number << 24) | (pdev->devfn << 16) | phb->opal_id;
>>+	rc = opal_pci_reset(id, scope, OPAL_ASSERT_RESET);
>>+	return pnv_pci_poll(id, rc, NULL);
>>+}
>>+
>>  static int pnv_pci_dev_reset_type(struct pci_dev *pdev, void *data)
>>  {
>>  	int *freset = data;
>>
>
>
>-- 
>Alexey
>
Alexey Kardashevskiy April 20, 2016, 4:17 a.m. UTC | #3
On 04/20/2016 12:33 PM, Gavin Shan wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 07:34:55PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> On 02/17/2016 02:44 PM, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>> The skiboot firmware might provide the PCI slot reset capability
>>> which is identified by property "ibm,reset-by-firmware" on the
>>> PCI slot associated device node.
>>>
>>> This checks the property. If it exists, the reset request is routed
>>> to firmware. Otherwise, the reset is done by kernel as before.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>> ---
>>>   arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>   1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
>>> index e23b063..c8a5217 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
>>> @@ -789,7 +789,7 @@ static int pnv_eeh_root_reset(struct pci_controller *hose, int option)
>>>   	return ret;
>>>   }
>>>
>>> -static int pnv_eeh_bridge_reset(struct pci_dev *dev, int option)
>>> +static int __pnv_eeh_bridge_reset(struct pci_dev *dev, int option)
>>>   {
>>>   	struct pci_dn *pdn = pci_get_pdn_by_devfn(dev->bus, dev->devfn);
>>>   	struct eeh_dev *edev = pdn_to_eeh_dev(pdn);
>>> @@ -840,6 +840,45 @@ static int pnv_eeh_bridge_reset(struct pci_dev *dev, int option)
>>>   	return 0;
>>>   }
>>>
>>> +static int pnv_eeh_bridge_reset(struct pci_dev *pdev, int option)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct pci_controller *hose;
>>> +	struct pnv_phb *phb;
>>> +	struct device_node *dn = pdev ? pci_device_to_OF_node(pdev) : NULL;
>>> +	uint64_t id = (0x1ul << 60);
>>
>>
>> What is this 1<<60 for?
>>
>>
>
> As you replied in other threads, it's worthy to have some macros for this
> piece of business. This bit indicates the ID of the slot behind a switch
> port. If this bit is cleared, the ID represents a PHB slot.
>
>>> +	uint8_t scope;
>>> +	int64_t rc;
>>> +
>>> +	/*
>>> +	 * If the firmware can't handle it, we will issue hot reset
>>> +	 * on the secondary bus despite the requested reset type.
>>> +	 */
>>> +	if (!dn || !of_get_property(dn, "ibm,reset-by-firmware", NULL))
>>> +		return __pnv_eeh_bridge_reset(pdev, option);
>>> +
>>> +	/* The firmware can handle the request */
>>> +	switch (option) {
>>> +	case EEH_RESET_HOT:
>>> +		scope = OPAL_RESET_PCI_HOT;
>>> +		break;
>>> +	case EEH_RESET_FUNDAMENTAL:
>>> +		scope = OPAL_RESET_PCI_FUNDAMENTAL;
>>> +		break;
>>> +	case EEH_RESET_DEACTIVATE:
>>> +		return 0;
>>> +	default:
>>> +		dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "%s: Unsupported reset %d\n",
>>> +			 __func__, option);
>>
>>
>> Can the userspace trigger this case (via VFIO-EEH) and flood dmesg?
>>
>
> It depends on how you defined message flooding actually. It's abnormal
> path caused by program internal error, not external users.


Can QEMU be changed to do something special (cause reset with a wrong 
option) via VFIO/EEH interface in a loop to make this message appear? Or 
the call with a wrong option will never reach this point?


>
>>
>>
>>> +		return -EINVAL;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	hose = pci_bus_to_host(pdev->bus);
>>> +	phb = hose->private_data;
>>> +	id |= (pdev->bus->number << 24) | (pdev->devfn << 16) | phb->opal_id;
>>> +	rc = opal_pci_reset(id, scope, OPAL_ASSERT_RESET);
>>> +	return pnv_pci_poll(id, rc, NULL);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>   static int pnv_pci_dev_reset_type(struct pci_dev *pdev, void *data)
>>>   {
>>>   	int *freset = data;
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Alexey
>>
>
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
index e23b063..c8a5217 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
@@ -789,7 +789,7 @@  static int pnv_eeh_root_reset(struct pci_controller *hose, int option)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int pnv_eeh_bridge_reset(struct pci_dev *dev, int option)
+static int __pnv_eeh_bridge_reset(struct pci_dev *dev, int option)
 {
 	struct pci_dn *pdn = pci_get_pdn_by_devfn(dev->bus, dev->devfn);
 	struct eeh_dev *edev = pdn_to_eeh_dev(pdn);
@@ -840,6 +840,45 @@  static int pnv_eeh_bridge_reset(struct pci_dev *dev, int option)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int pnv_eeh_bridge_reset(struct pci_dev *pdev, int option)
+{
+	struct pci_controller *hose;
+	struct pnv_phb *phb;
+	struct device_node *dn = pdev ? pci_device_to_OF_node(pdev) : NULL;
+	uint64_t id = (0x1ul << 60);
+	uint8_t scope;
+	int64_t rc;
+
+	/*
+	 * If the firmware can't handle it, we will issue hot reset
+	 * on the secondary bus despite the requested reset type.
+	 */
+	if (!dn || !of_get_property(dn, "ibm,reset-by-firmware", NULL))
+		return __pnv_eeh_bridge_reset(pdev, option);
+
+	/* The firmware can handle the request */
+	switch (option) {
+	case EEH_RESET_HOT:
+		scope = OPAL_RESET_PCI_HOT;
+		break;
+	case EEH_RESET_FUNDAMENTAL:
+		scope = OPAL_RESET_PCI_FUNDAMENTAL;
+		break;
+	case EEH_RESET_DEACTIVATE:
+		return 0;
+	default:
+		dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "%s: Unsupported reset %d\n",
+			 __func__, option);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	hose = pci_bus_to_host(pdev->bus);
+	phb = hose->private_data;
+	id |= (pdev->bus->number << 24) | (pdev->devfn << 16) | phb->opal_id;
+	rc = opal_pci_reset(id, scope, OPAL_ASSERT_RESET);
+	return pnv_pci_poll(id, rc, NULL);
+}
+
 static int pnv_pci_dev_reset_type(struct pci_dev *pdev, void *data)
 {
 	int *freset = data;