From patchwork Thu May 27 12:58:30 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Claire Chang X-Patchwork-Id: 1484583 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=google header.b=N/RAF9cN; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FrSZN3N39z9sXL for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 22:59:24 +1000 (AEST) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FrSZN3pJCz308P for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 22:59:24 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=google header.b=N/RAF9cN; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=chromium.org (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::102f; helo=mail-pj1-x102f.google.com; envelope-from=tientzu@chromium.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=google header.b=N/RAF9cN; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-pj1-x102f.google.com (mail-pj1-x102f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FrSYv57Ymz2yX0 for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 22:58:58 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-pj1-x102f.google.com with SMTP id kr9so378388pjb.5 for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 05:58:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=kA+3MDeoUW6g7BAIQhmMZU6jpRRh7iFmQAMuxd9InLo=; b=N/RAF9cNvTcRd3iZmeYm87pVaO7FRy7mf9/WxIyCft3/KEf6OSpP1KzfVNdxCB6y/v f9rFlfhM52r7diCBgVLUZz2KQytMc21laqchIO1r5VInxr59Sd+7C4c0jiL2C5LzFLDG Gn+MKH5XFhuZrfNlpbnQvXijnbOOZUN/Rm2WA= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=kA+3MDeoUW6g7BAIQhmMZU6jpRRh7iFmQAMuxd9InLo=; b=ukbI6CfgFDhBYr7pqZ/vpWLbhupMPF7lelg/dZZDXF1Eq+bpqft40Dz4T1vSPPg0Ec hSrjOmhBLUhMohs9Zj3yGOqrxsfSLQw3qtRo9Op1oA6yTob/DdfOzcsahhpCnQQmVVnB Rr1C/Njz1c28vQWqKf2miMKKIrldFooYFOauLEQDoa5qOdWfswVIPwasq9heE03dMR8m xjcaMJh+kY0YvfC7PYBZowPCR0LiZKgFC0bn/w8sMDYqSp1cam6ckOM+mor1j3sccb/O tWGhVGd0h4GHZJshW/4Jat+UGX/BEUuZxWRaZ6SJGqcYLDmT9Qw3has88DK8d5FeT6L5 4vxA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531dx1qb6qh1vgsPEnX423REFFUG+mZSbAKHyO8KnKE2sr2lsqgU /m26cVLl/QTmDFLNojIDRa2QVw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxa0KAbUWt2GVQAhxJJasbt6KcrMvbewz9fOfHqfZGpT+rFwlvdT6CpO+Xk/o30NYlBhsWhJg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:b22:: with SMTP id 31mr9588913pjq.179.1622120335442; Thu, 27 May 2021 05:58:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2401:fa00:95:205:a93:378d:9a9e:3b70]) by smtp.gmail.com with UTF8SMTPSA id e7sm2084005pfl.171.2021.05.27.05.58.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 27 May 2021 05:58:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Claire Chang To: Rob Herring , mpe@ellerman.id.au, Joerg Roedel , Will Deacon , Frank Rowand , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, jgross@suse.com, Christoph Hellwig , Marek Szyprowski Subject: [PATCH v8 00/15] Restricted DMA Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 20:58:30 +0800 Message-Id: <20210527125845.1852284-1-tientzu@chromium.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1.818.g46aad6cb9e-goog MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com, thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org, joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, chris@chris-wilson.co.uk, grant.likely@arm.com, paulus@samba.org, mingo@kernel.org, jxgao@google.com, sstabellini@kernel.org, Saravana Kannan , xypron.glpk@gmx.de, "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Bartosz Golaszewski , bskeggs@redhat.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Thierry Reding , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, matthew.auld@intel.com, linux-devicetree , daniel@ffwll.ch, airlied@linux.ie, maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, jani.nikula@linux.intel.com, Nicolas Boichat , rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, bhelgaas@google.com, tientzu@chromium.org, Dan Williams , Andy Shevchenko , Greg KH , Randy Dunlap , lkml , tfiga@chromium.org, "list@263.net:IOMMU DRIVERS" , Jim Quinlan , Robin Murphy , bauerman@linux.ibm.com Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" This series implements mitigations for lack of DMA access control on systems without an IOMMU, which could result in the DMA accessing the system memory at unexpected times and/or unexpected addresses, possibly leading to data leakage or corruption. For example, we plan to use the PCI-e bus for Wi-Fi and that PCI-e bus is not behind an IOMMU. As PCI-e, by design, gives the device full access to system memory, a vulnerability in the Wi-Fi firmware could easily escalate to a full system exploit (remote wifi exploits: [1a], [1b] that shows a full chain of exploits; [2], [3]). To mitigate the security concerns, we introduce restricted DMA. Restricted DMA utilizes the existing swiotlb to bounce streaming DMA in and out of a specially allocated region and does memory allocation from the same region. The feature on its own provides a basic level of protection against the DMA overwriting buffer contents at unexpected times. However, to protect against general data leakage and system memory corruption, the system needs to provide a way to restrict the DMA to a predefined memory region (this is usually done at firmware level, e.g. MPU in ATF on some ARM platforms [4]). [1a] https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.com/2017/04/over-air-exploiting-broadcoms-wi-fi_4.html [1b] https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.com/2017/04/over-air-exploiting-broadcoms-wi-fi_11.html [2] https://blade.tencent.com/en/advisories/qualpwn/ [3] https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/vulnerabilities-found-in-highly-popular-firmware-for-wifi-chips/ [4] https://github.com/ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware/blob/master/plat/mediatek/mt8183/drivers/emi_mpu/emi_mpu.c#L132 v8: - Fix reserved-memory.txt and add the reg property in example. - Fix sizeof for of_property_count_elems_of_size in drivers/of/address.c#of_dma_set_restricted_buffer. - Apply Will's suggestion to try the OF node having DMA configuration in drivers/of/address.c#of_dma_set_restricted_buffer. - Fix typo in the comment of drivers/of/address.c#of_dma_set_restricted_buffer. - Add error message for PageHighMem in kernel/dma/swiotlb.c#rmem_swiotlb_device_init and move it to rmem_swiotlb_setup. - Fix the message string in rmem_swiotlb_setup. v7: Fix debugfs, PageHighMem and comment style in rmem_swiotlb_device_init https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/cover/1431031/ v6: Address the comments in v5 https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/cover/1423201/ v5: Rebase on latest linux-next https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/cover/1416899/ v4: - Fix spinlock bad magic - Use rmem->name for debugfs entry - Address the comments in v3 https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/cover/1378113/ v3: Using only one reserved memory region for both streaming DMA and memory allocation. https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/cover/1360992/ v2: Building on top of swiotlb. https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/cover/1280705/ v1: Using dma_map_ops. https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/cover/1271660/ Claire Chang (15): swiotlb: Refactor swiotlb init functions swiotlb: Refactor swiotlb_create_debugfs swiotlb: Add DMA_RESTRICTED_POOL swiotlb: Add restricted DMA pool initialization swiotlb: Add a new get_io_tlb_mem getter swiotlb: Update is_swiotlb_buffer to add a struct device argument swiotlb: Update is_swiotlb_active to add a struct device argument swiotlb: Bounce data from/to restricted DMA pool if available swiotlb: Move alloc_size to find_slots swiotlb: Refactor swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single dma-direct: Add a new wrapper __dma_direct_free_pages() swiotlb: Add restricted DMA alloc/free support. dma-direct: Allocate memory from restricted DMA pool if available dt-bindings: of: Add restricted DMA pool of: Add plumbing for restricted DMA pool .../reserved-memory/reserved-memory.txt | 36 ++- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_internal.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c | 2 +- drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 12 +- drivers/of/address.c | 25 ++ drivers/of/device.c | 3 + drivers/of/of_private.h | 5 + drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c | 2 +- drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c | 2 +- include/linux/device.h | 4 + include/linux/swiotlb.h | 41 ++- kernel/dma/Kconfig | 14 + kernel/dma/direct.c | 63 +++-- kernel/dma/direct.h | 9 +- kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 242 +++++++++++++----- 15 files changed, 362 insertions(+), 100 deletions(-) Tested-by: Will Deacon