diff mbox series

[v7,6/8] clk: tegra: cclk: Handle thermal DIV2 CPU frequency throttling

Message ID 20210510231737.30313-7-digetx@gmail.com
State Accepted
Headers show
Series Couple improvements for Tegra clk driver | expand

Commit Message

Dmitry Osipenko May 10, 2021, 11:17 p.m. UTC
Check whether thermal DIV2 throttle is active in order to report
the CPU frequency properly. This very useful for userspace tools
like cpufreq-info which show actual frequency asserted from hardware.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra-super-cclk.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
 drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra30.c          |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Michał Mirosław May 11, 2021, 2:41 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 02:17:35AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> Check whether thermal DIV2 throttle is active in order to report
> the CPU frequency properly. This very useful for userspace tools
> like cpufreq-info which show actual frequency asserted from hardware.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra-super-cclk.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
>  drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra30.c          |  2 +-
>  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra-super-cclk.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra-super-cclk.c
> index a03119c30456..f75822b71d0e 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra-super-cclk.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra-super-cclk.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@
>  
>  #define SUPER_CDIV_ENB		BIT(31)
>  
> +#define TSENSOR_SLOWDOWN	BIT(23)
> +
>  static struct tegra_clk_super_mux *cclk_super;
>  static bool cclk_on_pllx;
>  
> @@ -47,10 +49,20 @@ static int cclk_super_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>  static unsigned long cclk_super_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>  					    unsigned long parent_rate)
>  {
> +	struct tegra_clk_super_mux *super = to_clk_super_mux(hw);
> +	u32 val = readl_relaxed(super->reg);
> +	unsigned int div2;
> +
> +	/* check whether thermal throttling is active */
> +	if (val & TSENSOR_SLOWDOWN)
> +		div2 = 2;
> +	else
> +		div2 = 1;
> +
>  	if (cclk_super_get_parent(hw) == PLLX_INDEX)
> -		return parent_rate;
> +		return parent_rate / div2;
>  
> -	return tegra_clk_super_ops.recalc_rate(hw, parent_rate);
> +	return tegra_clk_super_ops.recalc_rate(hw, parent_rate) / div2;
>  }

Could you check if the compiler can optimize out the division? I know this
is a slow path, but nevertheless the 'shr' version would be the same amount
of source code.

Best Regrads
Michał Mirosław
Dmitry Osipenko May 11, 2021, 3:23 p.m. UTC | #2
11.05.2021 17:41, Michał Mirosław пишет:
> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 02:17:35AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> Check whether thermal DIV2 throttle is active in order to report
>> the CPU frequency properly. This very useful for userspace tools
>> like cpufreq-info which show actual frequency asserted from hardware.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra-super-cclk.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
>>  drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra30.c          |  2 +-
>>  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra-super-cclk.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra-super-cclk.c
>> index a03119c30456..f75822b71d0e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra-super-cclk.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra-super-cclk.c
>> @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@
>>  
>>  #define SUPER_CDIV_ENB		BIT(31)
>>  
>> +#define TSENSOR_SLOWDOWN	BIT(23)
>> +
>>  static struct tegra_clk_super_mux *cclk_super;
>>  static bool cclk_on_pllx;
>>  
>> @@ -47,10 +49,20 @@ static int cclk_super_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>>  static unsigned long cclk_super_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>>  					    unsigned long parent_rate)
>>  {
>> +	struct tegra_clk_super_mux *super = to_clk_super_mux(hw);
>> +	u32 val = readl_relaxed(super->reg);
>> +	unsigned int div2;
>> +
>> +	/* check whether thermal throttling is active */
>> +	if (val & TSENSOR_SLOWDOWN)
>> +		div2 = 2;
>> +	else
>> +		div2 = 1;
>> +
>>  	if (cclk_super_get_parent(hw) == PLLX_INDEX)
>> -		return parent_rate;
>> +		return parent_rate / div2;
>>  
>> -	return tegra_clk_super_ops.recalc_rate(hw, parent_rate);
>> +	return tegra_clk_super_ops.recalc_rate(hw, parent_rate) / div2;
>>  }
> 
> Could you check if the compiler can optimize out the division? I know this
> is a slow path, but nevertheless the 'shr' version would be the same amount
> of source code.

Hello Michał,

GCC can't optimize that division. I'll wait for more comments and then
update this patch in v8 with yours suggestion. Thank you for taking a
look at the patches.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra-super-cclk.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra-super-cclk.c
index a03119c30456..f75822b71d0e 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra-super-cclk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra-super-cclk.c
@@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ 
 
 #define SUPER_CDIV_ENB		BIT(31)
 
+#define TSENSOR_SLOWDOWN	BIT(23)
+
 static struct tegra_clk_super_mux *cclk_super;
 static bool cclk_on_pllx;
 
@@ -47,10 +49,20 @@  static int cclk_super_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
 static unsigned long cclk_super_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
 					    unsigned long parent_rate)
 {
+	struct tegra_clk_super_mux *super = to_clk_super_mux(hw);
+	u32 val = readl_relaxed(super->reg);
+	unsigned int div2;
+
+	/* check whether thermal throttling is active */
+	if (val & TSENSOR_SLOWDOWN)
+		div2 = 2;
+	else
+		div2 = 1;
+
 	if (cclk_super_get_parent(hw) == PLLX_INDEX)
-		return parent_rate;
+		return parent_rate / div2;
 
-	return tegra_clk_super_ops.recalc_rate(hw, parent_rate);
+	return tegra_clk_super_ops.recalc_rate(hw, parent_rate) / div2;
 }
 
 static int cclk_super_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra30.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra30.c
index a33688b2359e..5b6bd138be84 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra30.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra30.c
@@ -930,7 +930,7 @@  static void __init tegra30_super_clk_init(void)
 	/* CCLKG */
 	clk = tegra_clk_register_super_cclk("cclk_g", cclk_g_parents,
 				  ARRAY_SIZE(cclk_g_parents),
-				  CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
+				  CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE,
 				  clk_base + CCLKG_BURST_POLICY,
 				  0, NULL);
 	clks[TEGRA30_CLK_CCLK_G] = clk;