| Message ID | 20210329194602.17049-4-digetx@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | NVIDIA Tegra memory improvements | expand |
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra124-emc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra124-emc.yaml index 09bde65e1955..a7483547ccf8 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra124-emc.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra124-emc.yaml @@ -37,9 +37,10 @@ properties: description: phandle of the memory controller node - core-supply: + power-domains: + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle description: - Phandle of voltage regulator of the SoC "core" power domain. + Phandle of the SoC "core" power domain. operating-points-v2: description: @@ -370,7 +371,7 @@ examples: nvidia,memory-controller = <&mc>; operating-points-v2 = <&dvfs_opp_table>; - core-supply = <&vdd_core>; + power-domains = <&domain>; #interconnect-cells = <0>;
Power domain fits much better than a voltage regulator in regards to a proper hardware description and from a software perspective as well. Hence replace the core regulator with the power domain. Note that this doesn't affect any existing DTBs because we haven't started to use the regulator yet, and thus, it's okay to change it. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> --- .../bindings/memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra124-emc.yaml | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)