From patchwork Tue Jul 30 16:56:10 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Dmitry Osipenko X-Patchwork-Id: 1139118 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=none (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=209.132.180.67; helo=vger.kernel.org; envelope-from=linux-tegra-owner@vger.kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="E1/it1Yf"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45yjT35zXZz9sBZ for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 02:59:19 +1000 (AEST) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729827AbfG3Q6U (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jul 2019 12:58:20 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f67.google.com ([209.85.221.67]:43645 "EHLO mail-wr1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729743AbfG3Q6U (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jul 2019 12:58:20 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f67.google.com with SMTP id p13so66549009wru.10; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 09:58:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ACV2ZWfTaEmtxdFrYT9DjBnIgPftGulBSmYYyCGemp8=; b=E1/it1YfpdyfnWTgwH3yUnql+MLfJL8znOLkgbPFW/ijT8yoUewMcSROyeKTpQtAyl dCn6b5qChaXm/o7JZ9+HFflXTuSULgxlHGjxjFitbHA2mrM74ULB08RZqUGmjdZBXDZO UwAjkBe0cN87Lz6VFgiPTHegab30Hb4jyor307SJvMUcPW2iNri6jD38j+jG+YcgqUqT H1O7i9uDwqr8Rlr30x4Jjng3P0W9qw+soCWDmZL/gnAUw+OU2cImSwAEFxTjj8eMxBDi F0i1vxQ1GUoERNlVuaYTrOFfYlmYvo6Zj1p6D3nV1ZaK2HxMYwLawwP6mGiPNwpFrhb5 xYxQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ACV2ZWfTaEmtxdFrYT9DjBnIgPftGulBSmYYyCGemp8=; b=Jhb23OifNG1OoA9ySoAcmOefthmRSstPpmEJWTR2qdvx0L305nGq2GXR8WZbVoy9BV K9C4iHMTUTMEl7sduYoVP527p3yhaiIaT3q8fPJn3yrZR7h0QEW2McRT+zbw+VUvbqbA jp6Xem41p0r5OIZM03DngT8rfomJE1xC38grlENBp916KRTWqJf5kAkHRmwOAzApnd/k oNUE1SLoh0duaHZ6/JUNNsIM/yX3bod8pl73ZYJNgmdGjH7zj2c+8eH80iPicii5Kt9H q1odlyO8/jyBkEoihoaugJEsPsVHcdRM+tCeArzk/RES+Kg+iN+QdD1o9M1RAvQYUBl/ RgSQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU25A+ATY6HxQasAdFilvFbDcuA6nBkK3XI5O/cLjWbZ8Ue88IO rmI8pW3LVxlimyhdWUajWSTVI00L X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxw3F87deEBWqc6NSz3v7kKGliaLczt45/4GA9Xa3o9ql3vScL73c6GRyiPc+8NrIE/TBrVjw== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6190:: with SMTP id j16mr6819166wru.49.1564505897863; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 09:58:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (ppp91-78-220-99.pppoe.mtu-net.ru. [91.78.220.99]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r5sm70845040wmh.35.2019.07.30.09.58.16 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 30 Jul 2019 09:58:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Dmitry Osipenko To: Rob Herring , Michael Turquette , Joseph Lo , Thierry Reding , Jonathan Hunter , Peter De Schrijver , Prashant Gaikwad , Stephen Boyd Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v9 07/15] memory: tegra20-emc: Increase handshake timeout Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 19:56:10 +0300 Message-Id: <20190730165618.10122-8-digetx@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.22.0 In-Reply-To: <20190730165618.10122-1-digetx@gmail.com> References: <20190730165618.10122-1-digetx@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-tegra-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org Turned out that it could take over a millisecond under some circumstances, like running on a very low CPU/memory frequency. TRM says that handshake happens when there is a "safe" moment, but not explains exactly what that moment is. Apparently at least memory should be idling and thus the low frequency should be a reasonable cause for a longer handshake delay. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko --- drivers/memory/tegra/tegra20-emc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/memory/tegra/tegra20-emc.c b/drivers/memory/tegra/tegra20-emc.c index 25a6aad6a7a9..da75efc632c7 100644 --- a/drivers/memory/tegra/tegra20-emc.c +++ b/drivers/memory/tegra/tegra20-emc.c @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ static int emc_complete_timing_change(struct tegra_emc *emc, bool flush) } timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&emc->clk_handshake_complete, - usecs_to_jiffies(100)); + msecs_to_jiffies(100)); if (timeout == 0) { dev_err(emc->dev, "EMC-CAR handshake failed\n"); return -EIO;