diff mbox

gpu: host1x: use %pa to print dma_addr_t

Message ID 1378960909-15773-1-git-send-email-olof@lixom.net
State Not Applicable, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Olof Johansson Sept. 12, 2013, 4:41 a.m. UTC
This removes two warnings where dma_addr_t variables were printed using
%x when built with CONFIG_ARM_LPAE=y, thus having 64-bit dma_addr_t:

  drivers/gpu/host1x/hw/cdma_hw.c:57:3: warning: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'dma_addr_t'
  drivers/gpu/host1x/hw/debug_hw.c:175:10: warning: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'dma_addr_t'

Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
---
 drivers/gpu/host1x/hw/cdma_hw.c  |    4 ++--
 drivers/gpu/host1x/hw/debug_hw.c |    4 ++--
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Thierry Reding Sept. 16, 2013, 3:17 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 09:41:49PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> This removes two warnings where dma_addr_t variables were printed using
> %x when built with CONFIG_ARM_LPAE=y, thus having 64-bit dma_addr_t:
> 
>   drivers/gpu/host1x/hw/cdma_hw.c:57:3: warning: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'dma_addr_t'
>   drivers/gpu/host1x/hw/debug_hw.c:175:10: warning: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'dma_addr_t'

Hi Olof,

I can't reproduce this. Does this perhaps depend on some other patch?
When I enable LPAE I do see similar warnings in drivers/iommu/tegra-*.c
and those can indeed be fixed using an equivalent patch.

Thierry
Olof Johansson Sept. 16, 2013, 3:46 p.m. UTC | #2
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Thierry Reding
<thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 09:41:49PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
>> This removes two warnings where dma_addr_t variables were printed using
>> %x when built with CONFIG_ARM_LPAE=y, thus having 64-bit dma_addr_t:
>>
>>   drivers/gpu/host1x/hw/cdma_hw.c:57:3: warning: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'dma_addr_t'
>>   drivers/gpu/host1x/hw/debug_hw.c:175:10: warning: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'dma_addr_t'
>
> Hi Olof,
>
> I can't reproduce this. Does this perhaps depend on some other patch?
> When I enable LPAE I do see similar warnings in drivers/iommu/tegra-*.c
> and those can indeed be fixed using an equivalent patch.

You need to enable LPAE on a platform that also selects
ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT, I don't think tegra does. If you do it with
multi_v7_defconfig you'll see them.

However, see discussion on another of the emails in the series; I'll
have to introduce a new format specifier instead.


-Olof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Joe Perches Sept. 16, 2013, 3:54 p.m. UTC | #3
On Mon, 2013-09-16 at 08:46 -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Thierry Reding
> <thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 09:41:49PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> >> This removes two warnings where dma_addr_t variables were printed using
> >> %x when built with CONFIG_ARM_LPAE=y, thus having 64-bit dma_addr_t:
> >>
> >>   drivers/gpu/host1x/hw/cdma_hw.c:57:3: warning: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'dma_addr_t'
> >>   drivers/gpu/host1x/hw/debug_hw.c:175:10: warning: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'dma_addr_t'
> >
> > Hi Olof,
> >
> > I can't reproduce this. Does this perhaps depend on some other patch?
> > When I enable LPAE I do see similar warnings in drivers/iommu/tegra-*.c
> > and those can indeed be fixed using an equivalent patch.
> 
> You need to enable LPAE on a platform that also selects
> ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT, I don't think tegra does. If you do it with
> multi_v7_defconfig you'll see them.
> 
> However, see discussion on another of the emails in the series; I'll
> have to introduce a new format specifier instead.

Or not.

I don't know whether or not the dma_addr_t really needs a
fixed 18 byte output length for 64 bit uses.

I think always using a cast for dma_addr_t addresses like:

	printk("dma_addr_t: %#llx\n", (u64)addr);

would probably work just fine.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Olof Johansson Sept. 17, 2013, 12:06 a.m. UTC | #4
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-09-16 at 08:46 -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Thierry Reding
>> <thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 09:41:49PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
>> >> This removes two warnings where dma_addr_t variables were printed using
>> >> %x when built with CONFIG_ARM_LPAE=y, thus having 64-bit dma_addr_t:
>> >>
>> >>   drivers/gpu/host1x/hw/cdma_hw.c:57:3: warning: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'dma_addr_t'
>> >>   drivers/gpu/host1x/hw/debug_hw.c:175:10: warning: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'dma_addr_t'
>> >
>> > Hi Olof,
>> >
>> > I can't reproduce this. Does this perhaps depend on some other patch?
>> > When I enable LPAE I do see similar warnings in drivers/iommu/tegra-*.c
>> > and those can indeed be fixed using an equivalent patch.
>>
>> You need to enable LPAE on a platform that also selects
>> ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT, I don't think tegra does. If you do it with
>> multi_v7_defconfig you'll see them.
>>
>> However, see discussion on another of the emails in the series; I'll
>> have to introduce a new format specifier instead.
>
> Or not.
>
> I don't know whether or not the dma_addr_t really needs a
> fixed 18 byte output length for 64 bit uses.
>
> I think always using a cast for dma_addr_t addresses like:
>
>         printk("dma_addr_t: %#llx\n", (u64)addr);
>
> would probably work just fine.

Sigh. Any color would do. I just want to get rid of the mostly-bogus
warnings that makes it harder to spot real problems, I really don't
care how they're resolved.

None of the affected platforms today use 64-bit DMA anyway, so casting
down to u32 is equally acceptable. I'll repost with that instead.


-Olof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Randy Dunlap Sept. 17, 2013, 12:18 a.m. UTC | #5
On 09/16/13 17:06, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2013-09-16 at 08:46 -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Thierry Reding
>>> <thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 09:41:49PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
>>>>> This removes two warnings where dma_addr_t variables were printed using
>>>>> %x when built with CONFIG_ARM_LPAE=y, thus having 64-bit dma_addr_t:
>>>>>
>>>>>   drivers/gpu/host1x/hw/cdma_hw.c:57:3: warning: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'dma_addr_t'
>>>>>   drivers/gpu/host1x/hw/debug_hw.c:175:10: warning: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'dma_addr_t'
>>>>
>>>> Hi Olof,
>>>>
>>>> I can't reproduce this. Does this perhaps depend on some other patch?
>>>> When I enable LPAE I do see similar warnings in drivers/iommu/tegra-*.c
>>>> and those can indeed be fixed using an equivalent patch.
>>>
>>> You need to enable LPAE on a platform that also selects
>>> ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT, I don't think tegra does. If you do it with
>>> multi_v7_defconfig you'll see them.
>>>
>>> However, see discussion on another of the emails in the series; I'll
>>> have to introduce a new format specifier instead.
>>
>> Or not.
>>
>> I don't know whether or not the dma_addr_t really needs a
>> fixed 18 byte output length for 64 bit uses.
>>
>> I think always using a cast for dma_addr_t addresses like:
>>
>>         printk("dma_addr_t: %#llx\n", (u64)addr);
>>
>> would probably work just fine.
> 
> Sigh. Any color would do. I just want to get rid of the mostly-bogus
> warnings that makes it harder to spot real problems, I really don't
> care how they're resolved.
> 
> None of the affected platforms today use 64-bit DMA anyway, so casting
> down to u32 is equally acceptable. I'll repost with that instead.

Casting to u64 and using %llx is preferred for this throughout the kernel,
not u32.

That way you would never have to 'fix' those when those platforms use
64-bit DMA (this is where you say that they never will :).
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/host1x/hw/cdma_hw.c b/drivers/gpu/host1x/hw/cdma_hw.c
index 2ee4ad5..3db3011 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/host1x/hw/cdma_hw.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/host1x/hw/cdma_hw.c
@@ -54,8 +54,8 @@  static void cdma_timeout_cpu_incr(struct host1x_cdma *cdma, u32 getptr,
 		u32 *p = (u32 *)((u32)pb->mapped + getptr);
 		*(p++) = HOST1X_OPCODE_NOP;
 		*(p++) = HOST1X_OPCODE_NOP;
-		dev_dbg(host1x->dev, "%s: NOP at 0x%x\n", __func__,
-			pb->phys + getptr);
+		dev_dbg(host1x->dev, "%s: NOP at %pa+0x%x\n", __func__,
+			&pb->phys, getptr);
 		getptr = (getptr + 8) & (pb->size_bytes - 1);
 	}
 	wmb();
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/host1x/hw/debug_hw.c b/drivers/gpu/host1x/hw/debug_hw.c
index 334c038..346a54b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/host1x/hw/debug_hw.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/host1x/hw/debug_hw.c
@@ -171,8 +171,8 @@  static void show_channel_gathers(struct output *o, struct host1x_cdma *cdma)
 				continue;
 			}
 
-			host1x_debug_output(o, "    GATHER at %08x+%04x, %d words\n",
-					    g->base, g->offset, g->words);
+			host1x_debug_output(o, "    GATHER at %pa+%04x, %d words\n",
+					    &g->base, g->offset, g->words);
 
 			show_gather(o, g->base + g->offset, g->words, cdma,
 				    g->base, mapped);