@@ -6,7 +6,6 @@
#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
-struct pwm_capture;
struct seq_file;
struct pwm_chip;
@@ -251,6 +250,16 @@ pwm_set_relative_duty_cycle(struct pwm_state *state, unsigned int duty_cycle,
return 0;
}
+/**
+ * struct pwm_capture - PWM capture data
+ * @period: period of the PWM signal (in nanoseconds)
+ * @duty_cycle: duty cycle of the PWM signal (in nanoseconds)
+ */
+struct pwm_capture {
+ unsigned int period;
+ unsigned int duty_cycle;
+};
+
/**
* struct pwm_ops - PWM controller operations
* @request: optional hook for requesting a PWM
@@ -312,16 +321,6 @@ struct pwm_chip {
struct pwm_device *pwms;
};
-/**
- * struct pwm_capture - PWM capture data
- * @period: period of the PWM signal (in nanoseconds)
- * @duty_cycle: duty cycle of the PWM signal (in nanoseconds)
- */
-struct pwm_capture {
- unsigned int period;
- unsigned int duty_cycle;
-};
-
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PWM)
/* PWM user APIs */
struct pwm_device *pwm_request(int pwm_id, const char *label);
There is no cyclic dependency, so by reordering the forward declaration can be dropped. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> --- include/linux/pwm.h | 21 ++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) base-commit: 3d593b6e80ad2c911b5645af28d83eabb96e7c1b