From patchwork Sat Jun 20 12:17:47 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Hans de Goede X-Patchwork-Id: 1313615 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=23.128.96.18; helo=vger.kernel.org; envelope-from=linux-pwm-owner@vger.kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=UHPkRBI3; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49pvq634tJz9sRN for ; Sat, 20 Jun 2020 22:18:58 +1000 (AEST) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728097AbgFTMS6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Jun 2020 08:18:58 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.120]:56502 "EHLO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728085AbgFTMS5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Jun 2020 08:18:57 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1592655536; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=UgxYU9BxtdMLnih7A4hfdL8tZUI9yTjPbVqz0uvNpdY=; b=UHPkRBI3IsolL1kmVoDOy6TFdBVhzowFLVOAs5KP5tCQR70GhfuSsoh795fdUc/Gb6AvVT MeE8zXuqq3kKIKVUM1jAz6l0myu3E/fAZCbj/GFYaaGLR2Z4MKzslejdliwLoYiR3qh9Q4 M2IYqxxubeNW7X1vURMW9QXpza4lDXw= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-472-lRZUycAwP1q_n2lSohsfDQ-1; Sat, 20 Jun 2020 08:18:52 -0400 X-MC-Unique: lRZUycAwP1q_n2lSohsfDQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D2338018D9; Sat, 20 Jun 2020 12:18:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from x1.localdomain.com (ovpn-112-42.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.42]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED4821001E91; Sat, 20 Jun 2020 12:18:47 +0000 (UTC) From: Hans de Goede To: Thierry Reding , =?utf-8?q?Uwe_Kleine-K=C3=B6n?= =?utf-8?q?ig?= , Jani Nikula , Joonas Lahtinen , =?utf-8?b?VmlsbGUgU3ly?= =?utf-8?b?asOkbMOk?= , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Len Brown Cc: Hans de Goede , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Andy Shevchenko , Mika Westerberg , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v3 04/15] pwm: lpss: Add range limit check for the base_unit register value Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2020 14:17:47 +0200 Message-Id: <20200620121758.14836-5-hdegoede@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20200620121758.14836-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> References: <20200620121758.14836-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 Sender: linux-pwm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org When the user requests a high enough period ns value, then the calculations in pwm_lpss_prepare() might result in a base_unit value of 0. But according to the data-sheet the way the PWM controller works is that each input clock-cycle the base_unit gets added to a N bit counter and that counter overflowing determines the PWM output frequency. Adding 0 to the counter is a no-op. The data-sheet even explicitly states that writing 0 to the base_unit bits will result in the PWM outputting a continuous 0 signal. When the user requestes a low enough period ns value, then the calculations in pwm_lpss_prepare() might result in a base_unit value which is bigger then base_unit_range - 1. Currently the codes for this deals with this by applying a mask: base_unit &= (base_unit_range - 1); But this means that we let the value overflow the range, we throw away the higher bits and store whatever value is left in the lower bits into the register leading to a random output frequency, rather then clamping the output frequency to the highest frequency which the hardware can do. This commit fixes both issues by clamping the base_unit value to be between 1 and (base_unit_range - 1). Fixes: 684309e5043e ("pwm: lpss: Avoid potential overflow of base_unit") Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede --- Changes in v3: - Change upper limit of clamp to (base_unit_range - 1) - Add Fixes tag --- drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c index 43b1fc634af1..80d0f9c64f9d 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c @@ -97,6 +97,9 @@ static void pwm_lpss_prepare(struct pwm_lpss_chip *lpwm, struct pwm_device *pwm, freq *= base_unit_range; base_unit = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(freq, c); + /* base_unit must not be 0 and we also want to avoid overflowing it */ + base_unit = clamp_t(unsigned long long, base_unit, 1, + base_unit_range - 1); on_time_div = 255ULL * duty_ns; do_div(on_time_div, period_ns); @@ -105,7 +108,6 @@ static void pwm_lpss_prepare(struct pwm_lpss_chip *lpwm, struct pwm_device *pwm, orig_ctrl = ctrl = pwm_lpss_read(pwm); ctrl &= ~PWM_ON_TIME_DIV_MASK; ctrl &= ~((base_unit_range - 1) << PWM_BASE_UNIT_SHIFT); - base_unit &= (base_unit_range - 1); ctrl |= (u32) base_unit << PWM_BASE_UNIT_SHIFT; ctrl |= on_time_div;