| Message ID | 20170707063939.GA20510@embeddedgus |
|---|---|
| State | Rejected |
| Headers | show |
On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com> wrote: > Check return value from call to of_match_device() > in order to prevent a NULL pointer dereference. > > In case of NULL print error message and return -ENODEV > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com> > --- > drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c > index 1284ffa..295ca19 100644 > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c > @@ -321,6 +321,10 @@ static int sun4i_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > const struct of_device_id *match; > > match = of_match_device(sun4i_pwm_dt_ids, &pdev->dev); AFAIK this simply can not and should not fail with a device tree only driver with properly populated of_device_id tables. ChenYu > + if (!match) { > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to match device\n"); > + return -ENODEV; > + } > > pwm = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pwm), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!pwm) > -- > 2.5.0 > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pwm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 03:16:23PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva > <garsilva@embeddedor.com> wrote: > > Check return value from call to of_match_device() > > in order to prevent a NULL pointer dereference. > > > > In case of NULL print error message and return -ENODEV > > > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com> > > --- > > drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c | 4 ++++ > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c > > index 1284ffa..295ca19 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c > > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c > > @@ -321,6 +321,10 @@ static int sun4i_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > const struct of_device_id *match; > > > > match = of_match_device(sun4i_pwm_dt_ids, &pdev->dev); > > AFAIK this simply can not and should not fail with a device tree > only driver with properly populated of_device_id tables. Technically this could happen if someone manually created the platform device. In that case the core will try to match by name if there is no device node to use for a match against the list of of_device_ids. In my opinion it's best to let things crash in this situation to make it really obvious that people have done something wrong. Thierry
Hi all, Quoting Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>: > On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 03:16:23PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva >> <garsilva@embeddedor.com> wrote: >> > Check return value from call to of_match_device() >> > in order to prevent a NULL pointer dereference. >> > >> > In case of NULL print error message and return -ENODEV >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com> >> > --- >> > drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c | 4 ++++ >> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) >> > >> > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c >> > index 1284ffa..295ca19 100644 >> > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c >> > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c >> > @@ -321,6 +321,10 @@ static int sun4i_pwm_probe(struct >> platform_device *pdev) >> > const struct of_device_id *match; >> > >> > match = of_match_device(sun4i_pwm_dt_ids, &pdev->dev); >> >> AFAIK this simply can not and should not fail with a device tree >> only driver with properly populated of_device_id tables. > > Technically this could happen if someone manually created the platform > device. In that case the core will try to match by name if there is no > device node to use for a match against the list of of_device_ids. > > In my opinion it's best to let things crash in this situation to make > it really obvious that people have done something wrong. > I get it. Thanks for clarifying. -- Gustavo A. R. Silva -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pwm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c index 1284ffa..295ca19 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c @@ -321,6 +321,10 @@ static int sun4i_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) const struct of_device_id *match; match = of_match_device(sun4i_pwm_dt_ids, &pdev->dev); + if (!match) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to match device\n"); + return -ENODEV; + } pwm = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pwm), GFP_KERNEL); if (!pwm)
Check return value from call to of_match_device() in order to prevent a NULL pointer dereference. In case of NULL print error message and return -ENODEV Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com> --- drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)