diff mbox

[7/8] ASoC: fsl_spdif: fix struct clk pointer comparing

Message ID 1424876018-17852-8-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org
State Not Applicable
Headers show

Commit Message

Shawn Guo Feb. 25, 2015, 2:53 p.m. UTC
Since commit 035a61c314eb ("clk: Make clk API return per-user struct clk
instances"), clk API users can no longer check if two struct clk
pointers are pointing to the same hardware clock, i.e. struct clk_hw, by
simply comparing two pointers.  That's because with the per-user clk
change, a brand new struct clk is created whenever clients try to look
up the clock by calling clk_get() or sister functions like clk_get_sys()
and of_clk_get().  This changes the original behavior where the struct
clk is only created for once when clock driver registers the clock to
CCF in the first place.  The net change here is before commit
035a61c314eb the struct clk pointer is unique for given hardware
clock, while after the commit the pointers returned by clk lookup calls
become different for the same hardware clock.

That said, the struct clk pointer comparing in the code doesn't work any
more.  Call helper function clk_is_match() instead to fix the problem.

Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
---
 sound/soc/fsl/fsl_spdif.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Mark Brown Feb. 26, 2015, 2:12 a.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:53:37PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> Since commit 035a61c314eb ("clk: Make clk API return per-user struct clk
> instances"), clk API users can no longer check if two struct clk
> pointers are pointing to the same hardware clock, i.e. struct clk_hw, by

Applied, thanks.
Shawn Guo Feb. 26, 2015, 2:20 a.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 11:12:50AM +0900, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:53:37PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > Since commit 035a61c314eb ("clk: Make clk API return per-user struct clk
> > instances"), clk API users can no longer check if two struct clk
> > pointers are pointing to the same hardware clock, i.e. struct clk_hw, by
> 
> Applied, thanks.

Mark,

Sorry that I did not make it clear in the cover-letter.  But the first
patch introduces a helper function clk_is_match(), on which all the
other patches in the series depend.  That said, the patch series should
probably be handled by Mike as a whole.

Shawn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pwm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Mark Brown Feb. 26, 2015, 2:29 a.m. UTC | #3
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 10:20:00AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:

> Sorry that I did not make it clear in the cover-letter.  But the first
> patch introduces a helper function clk_is_match(), on which all the
> other patches in the series depend.  That said, the patch series should
> probably be handled by Mike as a whole.

Ugh, right.  I've dropped those patches then.
Mark Brown Feb. 26, 2015, 2:36 a.m. UTC | #4
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:53:37PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> Since commit 035a61c314eb ("clk: Make clk API return per-user struct clk
> instances"), clk API users can no longer check if two struct clk
> pointers are pointing to the same hardware clock, i.e. struct clk_hw, by

Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_spdif.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_spdif.c
index 75870c0ea2c9..91eb3aef7f02 100644
--- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_spdif.c
+++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_spdif.c
@@ -1049,7 +1049,7 @@  static u32 fsl_spdif_txclk_caldiv(struct fsl_spdif_priv *spdif_priv,
 				enum spdif_txrate index, bool round)
 {
 	const u32 rate[] = { 32000, 44100, 48000, 96000, 192000 };
-	bool is_sysclk = clk == spdif_priv->sysclk;
+	bool is_sysclk = clk_is_match(clk, spdif_priv->sysclk);
 	u64 rate_ideal, rate_actual, sub;
 	u32 sysclk_dfmin, sysclk_dfmax;
 	u32 txclk_df, sysclk_df, arate;
@@ -1143,7 +1143,7 @@  static int fsl_spdif_probe_txclk(struct fsl_spdif_priv *spdif_priv,
 			spdif_priv->txclk_src[index], rate[index]);
 	dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "use txclk df %d for %dHz sample rate\n",
 			spdif_priv->txclk_df[index], rate[index]);
-	if (spdif_priv->txclk[index] == spdif_priv->sysclk)
+	if (clk_is_match(spdif_priv->txclk[index], spdif_priv->sysclk))
 		dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "use sysclk df %d for %dHz sample rate\n",
 				spdif_priv->sysclk_df[index], rate[index]);
 	dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "the best rate for %dHz sample rate is %dHz\n",