Message ID | 20250509095234.643890-1-nylon.chen@sifive.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Change PWM-controlled LED pin active mode and algorithm | expand |
Hello, patches 1 and 2 ideally go in together, right? @Conor, does your Ack mean that you're OK with me taking the dts change via my pwm tree? On Fri, May 09, 2025 at 05:52:29PM +0800, Nylon Chen wrote: > Nylon Chen (5): > riscv: dts: sifive: unleashed/unmatched: Remove PWM controlled LED's > active-low properties > pwm: sifive: change the PWM algorithm > pwm: sifive: Fix the error in the idempotent test within the > pwm_apply_state_debug function > pwm: sifive: Fix rounding issues in apply and get_state functions > pwm: sifive: clarify inverted compare logic in comments The objective of patches #3 and #4 is the same, right? Both prevent that .apply ∘ .get_state is idempotent, right? And I'd also squash patches #2 and #5 to have the comments updated together with the respective code changes. I think the algorithm implemented in this driver is more complicated than it should be, but this is not this series's fault, so I tend to apply it with the above mentioned squashes. Best regards Uwe
On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 12:21:45PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Hello, > > patches 1 and 2 ideally go in together, right? @Conor, does your Ack > mean that you're OK with me taking the dts change via my pwm tree? That's exactly what an ack from me means, yes.