| Message ID | 1645003971-16908-1-git-send-email-xinlei.lee@mediatek.com |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | Convert pwm-mtk-disp.txt to mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml format | expand |
On 2/16/22 5:32 PM, xinlei.lee@mediatek.com wrote: > From: Xinlei Lee <xinlei.lee@mediatek.corp-partner.google.com> > > Changes since v1: > 1. Fixed formatting issues mentioned in the v1. > 2. Delete pwm-mtk-disp.txt. > 3. Add mtk_pwm dt_maintainers. > 4. Add "#pwm-cells" & power-domains properties. > 5. Make dt_checking successful. > > Xinlei Lee (4): > dt-bindings: pwm: Convert pwm-mtk-disp.txt to mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml > format > dt-bindings: pwm: Add compatible for MediaTek MT8192 > dt-bindings: pwm: Add compatible for MediaTek MT8195 > dt-bindings: pwm: Add compatible for MediaTek MT8186 > > .../bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml | 74 +++++++++++++++++++ > .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.txt | 44 ----------- > 2 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-) > create mode 100755 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml > delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.txt > Why did you drop [PATCH] tag in the subject of your patch series? Please keep it for distinguishing it from RFC/RESEND and other meaningful tags next time. Thanks Macpaul Lin
On 16/02/2022 10:47, Macpaul Lin wrote: > > > On 2/16/22 5:32 PM, xinlei.lee@mediatek.com wrote: >> From: Xinlei Lee <xinlei.lee@mediatek.corp-partner.google.com> >> >> Changes since v1: >> 1. Fixed formatting issues mentioned in the v1. >> 2. Delete pwm-mtk-disp.txt. >> 3. Add mtk_pwm dt_maintainers. >> 4. Add "#pwm-cells" & power-domains properties. >> 5. Make dt_checking successful. >> >> Xinlei Lee (4): >> dt-bindings: pwm: Convert pwm-mtk-disp.txt to mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml >> format >> dt-bindings: pwm: Add compatible for MediaTek MT8192 >> dt-bindings: pwm: Add compatible for MediaTek MT8195 >> dt-bindings: pwm: Add compatible for MediaTek MT8186 >> >> .../bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml | 74 +++++++++++++++++++ >> .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.txt | 44 ----------- >> 2 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-) >> create mode 100755 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml >> delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.txt >> > > Why did you drop [PATCH] tag in the subject of your patch series? > Please keep it for distinguishing it from RFC/RESEND and other > meaningful tags next time. I also asked for this in v1 patchset, so it's a pity my suggestion was not listened to. Best regards, Krzysztof
On 16/02/2022 10:32, xinlei.lee@mediatek.com wrote: > From: Xinlei Lee <xinlei.lee@mediatek.corp-partner.google.com> > > Changes since v1: > 1. Fixed formatting issues mentioned in the v1. > 2. Delete pwm-mtk-disp.txt. > 3. Add mtk_pwm dt_maintainers. > 4. Add "#pwm-cells" & power-domains properties. > 5. Make dt_checking successful. Any reason in changing your email address in all patches? Maybe some mail client misconfiguration? Best regards, Krzysztof
From: Xinlei Lee <xinlei.lee@mediatek.corp-partner.google.com> Changes since v1: 1. Fixed formatting issues mentioned in the v1. 2. Delete pwm-mtk-disp.txt. 3. Add mtk_pwm dt_maintainers. 4. Add "#pwm-cells" & power-domains properties. 5. Make dt_checking successful. Xinlei Lee (4): dt-bindings: pwm: Convert pwm-mtk-disp.txt to mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml format dt-bindings: pwm: Add compatible for MediaTek MT8192 dt-bindings: pwm: Add compatible for MediaTek MT8195 dt-bindings: pwm: Add compatible for MediaTek MT8186 .../bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml | 74 +++++++++++++++++++ .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.txt | 44 ----------- 2 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-) create mode 100755 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.txt