diff mbox series

[v2,1/2] PCI: hv: Replace hv_vp_set with hv_vpset

Message ID 2fa660dc51189316590021c4ee8aeaac79b8270f.1548489092.git.m.maya.nakamura@gmail.com
State Superseded
Delegated to: Lorenzo Pieralisi
Headers show
Series PCI: hv: Refactor hv_irq_unmask() to use hv_vpset and cpumask_to_vpset() | expand

Commit Message

Maya Nakamura Jan. 26, 2019, 8:52 a.m. UTC
Remove a duplicate definition of VP set (hv_vp_set) and use the common
definition (hv_vpset) that is used in other places.

Change the order of the members in struct hv_pcibus_device so that the
declaration of retarget_msi_interrupt_params is the last member. Struct
hv_vpset, which contains a flexible array, is nested two levels deep in
struct hv_pcibus_device via retarget_msi_interrupt_params.

Add a comment that retarget_msi_interrupt_params should be the last member
of struct hv_pcibus_device.

Signed-off-by: Maya Nakamura <m.maya.nakamura@gmail.com>
---
Change in v2:
- None

 drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

Comments

Maya Nakamura Jan. 29, 2019, 5:49 a.m. UTC | #1
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 05:11:48AM +0000, Michael Kelley wrote:
> From: Maya Nakamura <m.maya.nakamura@gmail.com>  Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2019 12:52 AM
> > 
> > Remove a duplicate definition of VP set (hv_vp_set) and use the common
> > definition (hv_vpset) that is used in other places.
> > 
> > Change the order of the members in struct hv_pcibus_device so that the
> > declaration of retarget_msi_interrupt_params is the last member. Struct
> > hv_vpset, which contains a flexible array, is nested two levels deep in
> > struct hv_pcibus_device via retarget_msi_interrupt_params.
> > 
> > Add a comment that retarget_msi_interrupt_params should be the last member
> > of struct hv_pcibus_device.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Maya Nakamura <m.maya.nakamura@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > Change in v2:
> > - None
> > 
> 
> Right -- there was no code change.  But it's customary to note that
> you updated the commit message.
> 
Thank you for your feedback. I will edit the change log in v3.

> Reviewed-by:  Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Lorenzo Pieralisi Feb. 12, 2019, 4:35 p.m. UTC | #2
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 09:49:32PM -0800, Maya Nakamura wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 05:11:48AM +0000, Michael Kelley wrote:
> > From: Maya Nakamura <m.maya.nakamura@gmail.com>  Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2019 12:52 AM
> > > 
> > > Remove a duplicate definition of VP set (hv_vp_set) and use the common
> > > definition (hv_vpset) that is used in other places.
> > > 
> > > Change the order of the members in struct hv_pcibus_device so that the
> > > declaration of retarget_msi_interrupt_params is the last member. Struct
> > > hv_vpset, which contains a flexible array, is nested two levels deep in
> > > struct hv_pcibus_device via retarget_msi_interrupt_params.
> > > 
> > > Add a comment that retarget_msi_interrupt_params should be the last member
> > > of struct hv_pcibus_device.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Maya Nakamura <m.maya.nakamura@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > > Change in v2:
> > > - None
> > > 
> > 
> > Right -- there was no code change.  But it's customary to note that
> > you updated the commit message.
> > 
> Thank you for your feedback. I will edit the change log in v3.
> 
> > Reviewed-by:  Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>

Are you really sure there is no behavioural change ? What piece of
code allocates hv_vpset.bank_contents[] memory with this patch applied ?

I suspect the current code does not use hv_vpset for this specific
reason, ie allocate struct hv_vp_set.masks array memory statically.

Lorenzo
Lorenzo Pieralisi Feb. 13, 2019, 11:50 a.m. UTC | #3
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 02:20:29AM +0000, Michael Kelley wrote:
> From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>  Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 8:35 AM
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 09:49:32PM -0800, Maya Nakamura wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 05:11:48AM +0000, Michael Kelley wrote:
> > > > From: Maya Nakamura <m.maya.nakamura@gmail.com>  Sent: Saturday, January 26,
> > 2019 12:52 AM
> > > > >
> > > > > Remove a duplicate definition of VP set (hv_vp_set) and use the common
> > > > > definition (hv_vpset) that is used in other places.
> > > > >
> > > > > Change the order of the members in struct hv_pcibus_device so that the
> > > > > declaration of retarget_msi_interrupt_params is the last member. Struct
> > > > > hv_vpset, which contains a flexible array, is nested two levels deep in
> > > > > struct hv_pcibus_device via retarget_msi_interrupt_params.
> > > > >
> > > > > Add a comment that retarget_msi_interrupt_params should be the last member
> > > > > of struct hv_pcibus_device.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Maya Nakamura <m.maya.nakamura@gmail.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > Change in v2:
> > > > > - None
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Right -- there was no code change.  But it's customary to note that
> > > > you updated the commit message.
> > > >
> > > Thank you for your feedback. I will edit the change log in v3.
> > >
> > > > Reviewed-by:  Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
> > 
> > Are you really sure there is no behavioural change ? What piece of
> > code allocates hv_vpset.bank_contents[] memory with this patch applied ?
> > 
> > I suspect the current code does not use hv_vpset for this specific
> > reason, ie allocate struct hv_vp_set.masks array memory statically.
> > 
> 
> There is indeed no behavior change.   A full page of memory is
> allocated in hv_pci_probe() so that we can be sure that the Hyper-V
> hypercall arguments don't cross a page boundary.   This page allows
> more than enough space for the hv_vpset.bank_contents[] to grow
> as needed (with one bit allocated in the masks for up to the limit
> of 8192 CPUs allowed by Linux).   A flexible array is used because
> the hv_vpset structure is also used in some MMU hypercalls that
> have two variable size arrays.

I see, thanks for explaining.

Lorenzo
Lorenzo Pieralisi Feb. 15, 2019, 10:26 a.m. UTC | #4
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 09:49:32PM -0800, Maya Nakamura wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 05:11:48AM +0000, Michael Kelley wrote:
> > From: Maya Nakamura <m.maya.nakamura@gmail.com>  Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2019 12:52 AM
> > > 
> > > Remove a duplicate definition of VP set (hv_vp_set) and use the common
> > > definition (hv_vpset) that is used in other places.
> > > 
> > > Change the order of the members in struct hv_pcibus_device so that the
> > > declaration of retarget_msi_interrupt_params is the last member. Struct
> > > hv_vpset, which contains a flexible array, is nested two levels deep in
> > > struct hv_pcibus_device via retarget_msi_interrupt_params.
> > > 
> > > Add a comment that retarget_msi_interrupt_params should be the last member
> > > of struct hv_pcibus_device.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Maya Nakamura <m.maya.nakamura@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > > Change in v2:
> > > - None
> > > 
> > 
> > Right -- there was no code change.  But it's customary to note that
> > you updated the commit message.
> > 
> Thank you for your feedback. I will edit the change log in v3.
> 
> > Reviewed-by:  Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>

I will add Michael's tag to v3 (unless Michael is not happy with that),
it is missing there.

Lorenzo
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
index 9ba4d12c179c..da8b58d8630d 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
@@ -393,12 +393,6 @@  struct hv_interrupt_entry {
 
 #define HV_VP_SET_BANK_COUNT_MAX	5 /* current implementation limit */
 
-struct hv_vp_set {
-	u64	format;			/* 0 (HvGenericSetSparse4k) */
-	u64	valid_banks;
-	u64	masks[HV_VP_SET_BANK_COUNT_MAX];
-};
-
 /*
  * flags for hv_device_interrupt_target.flags
  */
@@ -410,7 +404,7 @@  struct hv_device_interrupt_target {
 	u32	flags;
 	union {
 		u64		 vp_mask;
-		struct hv_vp_set vp_set;
+		struct hv_vpset vp_set;
 	};
 };
 
@@ -460,12 +454,16 @@  struct hv_pcibus_device {
 	struct msi_controller msi_chip;
 	struct irq_domain *irq_domain;
 
-	/* hypercall arg, must not cross page boundary */
-	struct retarget_msi_interrupt retarget_msi_interrupt_params;
-
 	spinlock_t retarget_msi_interrupt_lock;
 
 	struct workqueue_struct *wq;
+
+	/* hypercall arg, must not cross page boundary */
+	struct retarget_msi_interrupt retarget_msi_interrupt_params;
+
+	/*
+	 * Don't put anything here: retarget_msi_interrupt_params must be last
+	 */
 };
 
 /*
@@ -955,12 +953,13 @@  static void hv_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *data)
 		 */
 		params->int_target.flags |=
 			HV_DEVICE_INTERRUPT_TARGET_PROCESSOR_SET;
-		params->int_target.vp_set.valid_banks =
+		params->int_target.vp_set.valid_bank_mask =
 			(1ull << HV_VP_SET_BANK_COUNT_MAX) - 1;
 
 		/*
 		 * var-sized hypercall, var-size starts after vp_mask (thus
-		 * vp_set.format does not count, but vp_set.valid_banks does).
+		 * vp_set.format does not count, but vp_set.valid_bank_mask
+		 * does).
 		 */
 		var_size = 1 + HV_VP_SET_BANK_COUNT_MAX;
 
@@ -974,7 +973,7 @@  static void hv_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *data)
 				goto exit_unlock;
 			}
 
-			params->int_target.vp_set.masks[cpu_vmbus / 64] |=
+			params->int_target.vp_set.bank_contents[cpu_vmbus / 64]	|=
 				(1ULL << (cpu_vmbus & 63));
 		}
 	} else {