| Message ID | 20240307022006.3657433-1-aik@amd.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [kernel,v3] PCI/DOE: Support discovery version 2 | expand |
On 3/6/24 6:20 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > PCIe r6.1, sec 6.30.1.1 defines a "DOE Discovery Version" field in > the DOE Discovery Request Data Object Contents (3rd DW) as: > > 15:8 DOE Discovery Version – must be 02h if the Capability Version in > the Data Object Exchange Extended Capability is 02h or greater. Does this change fix any functional issue? If yes, please add Fixes: tag and probably CC stable? > > Add support for the version on devices with the DOE v2 capability. > > Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@amd.com> > --- Change wise looks fine to me. Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> > Changes: > v3: > * updated subject line > * dropped "DISCOVER_" from the new field macro > > v2: > * added the section number to the commit log > --- > include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h | 1 + > drivers/pci/doe.c | 11 ++++++++--- > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h b/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h > index a39193213ff2..fbca743b2b86 100644 > --- a/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h > @@ -1144,6 +1144,7 @@ > #define PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_HEADER_2_LENGTH 0x0003ffff > > #define PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_REQ_3_INDEX 0x000000ff > +#define PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_REQ_3_VER 0x0000ff00 > #define PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_RSP_3_VID 0x0000ffff > #define PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_RSP_3_PROTOCOL 0x00ff0000 > #define PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_RSP_3_NEXT_INDEX 0xff000000 > diff --git a/drivers/pci/doe.c b/drivers/pci/doe.c > index 61f0531d2b1d..c94c2b0767f3 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/doe.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/doe.c > @@ -381,11 +381,13 @@ static void pci_doe_task_complete(struct pci_doe_task *task) > complete(task->private); > } > > -static int pci_doe_discovery(struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb, u8 *index, u16 *vid, > +static int pci_doe_discovery(struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb, u8 capver, u8 *index, u16 *vid, > u8 *protocol) > { > u32 request_pl = FIELD_PREP(PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_REQ_3_INDEX, > - *index); > + *index) | > + FIELD_PREP(PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_REQ_3_VER, > + (capver >= 2) ? 2 : 0); > __le32 request_pl_le = cpu_to_le32(request_pl); > __le32 response_pl_le; > u32 response_pl; > @@ -419,13 +421,16 @@ static int pci_doe_cache_protocols(struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb) > { > u8 index = 0; > u8 xa_idx = 0; > + u32 hdr = 0; > + > + pci_read_config_dword(doe_mb->pdev, doe_mb->cap_offset, &hdr); > > do { > int rc; > u16 vid; > u8 prot; > > - rc = pci_doe_discovery(doe_mb, &index, &vid, &prot); > + rc = pci_doe_discovery(doe_mb, PCI_EXT_CAP_VER(hdr), &index, &vid, &prot); > if (rc) > return rc; >
On 7/3/24 16:06, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote: > > On 3/6/24 6:20 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >> PCIe r6.1, sec 6.30.1.1 defines a "DOE Discovery Version" field in >> the DOE Discovery Request Data Object Contents (3rd DW) as: >> >> 15:8 DOE Discovery Version – must be 02h if the Capability Version in >> the Data Object Exchange Extended Capability is 02h or greater. > > Does this change fix any functional issue? If yes, please add Fixes: > tag and probably CC stable? The issue is that before this patch the DOE driver was following PCIe r6.0 and it was not working on a device with DOE cap v2 added in r6.1. Is it "fixes"? >> >> Add support for the version on devices with the DOE v2 capability. >> >> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@amd.com> >> --- > Change wise looks fine to me. > > Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> Thanks! >> Changes: >> v3: >> * updated subject line >> * dropped "DISCOVER_" from the new field macro >> >> v2: >> * added the section number to the commit log >> --- >> include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h | 1 + >> drivers/pci/doe.c | 11 ++++++++--- >> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h b/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h >> index a39193213ff2..fbca743b2b86 100644 >> --- a/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h >> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h >> @@ -1144,6 +1144,7 @@ >> #define PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_HEADER_2_LENGTH 0x0003ffff >> >> #define PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_REQ_3_INDEX 0x000000ff >> +#define PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_REQ_3_VER 0x0000ff00 >> #define PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_RSP_3_VID 0x0000ffff >> #define PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_RSP_3_PROTOCOL 0x00ff0000 >> #define PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_RSP_3_NEXT_INDEX 0xff000000 >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/doe.c b/drivers/pci/doe.c >> index 61f0531d2b1d..c94c2b0767f3 100644 >> --- a/drivers/pci/doe.c >> +++ b/drivers/pci/doe.c >> @@ -381,11 +381,13 @@ static void pci_doe_task_complete(struct pci_doe_task *task) >> complete(task->private); >> } >> >> -static int pci_doe_discovery(struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb, u8 *index, u16 *vid, >> +static int pci_doe_discovery(struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb, u8 capver, u8 *index, u16 *vid, >> u8 *protocol) >> { >> u32 request_pl = FIELD_PREP(PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_REQ_3_INDEX, >> - *index); >> + *index) | >> + FIELD_PREP(PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_REQ_3_VER, >> + (capver >= 2) ? 2 : 0); >> __le32 request_pl_le = cpu_to_le32(request_pl); >> __le32 response_pl_le; >> u32 response_pl; >> @@ -419,13 +421,16 @@ static int pci_doe_cache_protocols(struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb) >> { >> u8 index = 0; >> u8 xa_idx = 0; >> + u32 hdr = 0; >> + >> + pci_read_config_dword(doe_mb->pdev, doe_mb->cap_offset, &hdr); >> >> do { >> int rc; >> u16 vid; >> u8 prot; >> >> - rc = pci_doe_discovery(doe_mb, &index, &vid, &prot); >> + rc = pci_doe_discovery(doe_mb, PCI_EXT_CAP_VER(hdr), &index, &vid, &prot); >> if (rc) >> return rc; >> >
On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 10:09 PM Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@amd.com> wrote: > > > > On 7/3/24 16:06, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote: > > > > On 3/6/24 6:20 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > >> PCIe r6.1, sec 6.30.1.1 defines a "DOE Discovery Version" field in > >> the DOE Discovery Request Data Object Contents (3rd DW) as: > >> > >> 15:8 DOE Discovery Version – must be 02h if the Capability Version in > >> the Data Object Exchange Extended Capability is 02h or greater. > > > > Does this change fix any functional issue? If yes, please add Fixes: > > tag and probably CC stable? > > The issue is that before this patch the DOE driver was following PCIe > r6.0 and it was not working on a device with DOE cap v2 added in r6.1. > Is it "fixes"? > Since you are enabling support for the newer spec version, I think it will not fall under bug fix. But it might be qualified for the stable branch. It depends on whether you want to support this device in older(stable) kernels. > > >> > >> Add support for the version on devices with the DOE v2 capability. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@amd.com> > >> --- > > Change wise looks fine to me. > > > > Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> > > Thanks! > > >> Changes: > >> v3: > >> * updated subject line > >> * dropped "DISCOVER_" from the new field macro > >> > >> v2: > >> * added the section number to the commit log > >> --- > >> include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h | 1 + > >> drivers/pci/doe.c | 11 ++++++++--- > >> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h b/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h > >> index a39193213ff2..fbca743b2b86 100644 > >> --- a/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h > >> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h > >> @@ -1144,6 +1144,7 @@ > >> #define PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_HEADER_2_LENGTH 0x0003ffff > >> > >> #define PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_REQ_3_INDEX 0x000000ff > >> +#define PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_REQ_3_VER 0x0000ff00 > >> #define PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_RSP_3_VID 0x0000ffff > >> #define PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_RSP_3_PROTOCOL 0x00ff0000 > >> #define PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_RSP_3_NEXT_INDEX 0xff000000 > >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/doe.c b/drivers/pci/doe.c > >> index 61f0531d2b1d..c94c2b0767f3 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/pci/doe.c > >> +++ b/drivers/pci/doe.c > >> @@ -381,11 +381,13 @@ static void pci_doe_task_complete(struct pci_doe_task *task) > >> complete(task->private); > >> } > >> > >> -static int pci_doe_discovery(struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb, u8 *index, u16 *vid, > >> +static int pci_doe_discovery(struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb, u8 capver, u8 *index, u16 *vid, > >> u8 *protocol) > >> { > >> u32 request_pl = FIELD_PREP(PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_REQ_3_INDEX, > >> - *index); > >> + *index) | > >> + FIELD_PREP(PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_REQ_3_VER, > >> + (capver >= 2) ? 2 : 0); > >> __le32 request_pl_le = cpu_to_le32(request_pl); > >> __le32 response_pl_le; > >> u32 response_pl; > >> @@ -419,13 +421,16 @@ static int pci_doe_cache_protocols(struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb) > >> { > >> u8 index = 0; > >> u8 xa_idx = 0; > >> + u32 hdr = 0; > >> + > >> + pci_read_config_dword(doe_mb->pdev, doe_mb->cap_offset, &hdr); > >> > >> do { > >> int rc; > >> u16 vid; > >> u8 prot; > >> > >> - rc = pci_doe_discovery(doe_mb, &index, &vid, &prot); > >> + rc = pci_doe_discovery(doe_mb, PCI_EXT_CAP_VER(hdr), &index, &vid, &prot); > >> if (rc) > >> return rc; > >> > > > > -- > Alexey >
On 7/3/24 17:22, Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy Natarajan wrote: > On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 10:09 PM Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@amd.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 7/3/24 16:06, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote: >>> >>> On 3/6/24 6:20 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >>>> PCIe r6.1, sec 6.30.1.1 defines a "DOE Discovery Version" field in >>>> the DOE Discovery Request Data Object Contents (3rd DW) as: >>>> >>>> 15:8 DOE Discovery Version – must be 02h if the Capability Version in >>>> the Data Object Exchange Extended Capability is 02h or greater. >>> >>> Does this change fix any functional issue? If yes, please add Fixes: >>> tag and probably CC stable? >> >> The issue is that before this patch the DOE driver was following PCIe >> r6.0 and it was not working on a device with DOE cap v2 added in r6.1. >> Is it "fixes"? >> > > Since you are enabling support for the newer spec version, I think it will not > fall under bug fix. But it might be qualified for the stable branch. > It depends on > whether you want to support this device in older(stable) kernels. I am going to need lot more stuff (TSM, IDE, TDISP) in addition to this but it is coming much later so there is no point in pushing this alone to older kernels. Thanks,
On 3/13/24 5:59 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > > > On 7/3/24 17:22, Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy Natarajan wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 10:09 PM Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@amd.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 7/3/24 16:06, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote: >>>> >>>> On 3/6/24 6:20 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >>>>> PCIe r6.1, sec 6.30.1.1 defines a "DOE Discovery Version" field in >>>>> the DOE Discovery Request Data Object Contents (3rd DW) as: >>>>> >>>>> 15:8 DOE Discovery Version – must be 02h if the Capability Version in >>>>> the Data Object Exchange Extended Capability is 02h or greater. >>>> >>>> Does this change fix any functional issue? If yes, please add Fixes: >>>> tag and probably CC stable? >>> >>> The issue is that before this patch the DOE driver was following PCIe >>> r6.0 and it was not working on a device with DOE cap v2 added in r6.1. >>> Is it "fixes"? >>> >> >> Since you are enabling support for the newer spec version, I think it will not >> fall under bug fix. But it might be qualified for the stable branch. >> It depends on >> whether you want to support this device in older(stable) kernels. > > > I am going to need lot more stuff (TSM, IDE, TDISP) in addition to this but it is coming much later so there is no point in pushing this alone to older kernels. Thanks, > > Got it. Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Ping? Is this going anywhere? Thanks, On 14/3/24 17:49, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote: > > On 3/13/24 5:59 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >> >> >> On 7/3/24 17:22, Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy Natarajan wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 10:09 PM Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@amd.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 7/3/24 16:06, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 3/6/24 6:20 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >>>>>> PCIe r6.1, sec 6.30.1.1 defines a "DOE Discovery Version" field in >>>>>> the DOE Discovery Request Data Object Contents (3rd DW) as: >>>>>> >>>>>> 15:8 DOE Discovery Version – must be 02h if the Capability Version in >>>>>> the Data Object Exchange Extended Capability is 02h or greater. >>>>> >>>>> Does this change fix any functional issue? If yes, please add Fixes: >>>>> tag and probably CC stable? >>>> >>>> The issue is that before this patch the DOE driver was following PCIe >>>> r6.0 and it was not working on a device with DOE cap v2 added in r6.1. >>>> Is it "fixes"? >>>> >>> >>> Since you are enabling support for the newer spec version, I think it will not >>> fall under bug fix. But it might be qualified for the stable branch. >>> It depends on >>> whether you want to support this device in older(stable) kernels. >> >> >> I am going to need lot more stuff (TSM, IDE, TDISP) in addition to this but it is coming much later so there is no point in pushing this alone to older kernels. Thanks, >> >> > Got it. > > Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> > >
On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 01:20:06PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > PCIe r6.1, sec 6.30.1.1 defines a "DOE Discovery Version" field in > the DOE Discovery Request Data Object Contents (3rd DW) as: > > 15:8 DOE Discovery Version – must be 02h if the Capability Version in > the Data Object Exchange Extended Capability is 02h or greater. > > Add support for the version on devices with the DOE v2 capability. > > Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@amd.com> Applied with Sathy's reviewed-by to pci/doe for v6.10, thanks! > --- > Changes: > v3: > * updated subject line > * dropped "DISCOVER_" from the new field macro > > v2: > * added the section number to the commit log > --- > include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h | 1 + > drivers/pci/doe.c | 11 ++++++++--- > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h b/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h > index a39193213ff2..fbca743b2b86 100644 > --- a/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h > @@ -1144,6 +1144,7 @@ > #define PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_HEADER_2_LENGTH 0x0003ffff > > #define PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_REQ_3_INDEX 0x000000ff > +#define PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_REQ_3_VER 0x0000ff00 > #define PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_RSP_3_VID 0x0000ffff > #define PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_RSP_3_PROTOCOL 0x00ff0000 > #define PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_RSP_3_NEXT_INDEX 0xff000000 > diff --git a/drivers/pci/doe.c b/drivers/pci/doe.c > index 61f0531d2b1d..c94c2b0767f3 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/doe.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/doe.c > @@ -381,11 +381,13 @@ static void pci_doe_task_complete(struct pci_doe_task *task) > complete(task->private); > } > > -static int pci_doe_discovery(struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb, u8 *index, u16 *vid, > +static int pci_doe_discovery(struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb, u8 capver, u8 *index, u16 *vid, > u8 *protocol) > { > u32 request_pl = FIELD_PREP(PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_REQ_3_INDEX, > - *index); > + *index) | > + FIELD_PREP(PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_REQ_3_VER, > + (capver >= 2) ? 2 : 0); > __le32 request_pl_le = cpu_to_le32(request_pl); > __le32 response_pl_le; > u32 response_pl; > @@ -419,13 +421,16 @@ static int pci_doe_cache_protocols(struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb) > { > u8 index = 0; > u8 xa_idx = 0; > + u32 hdr = 0; > + > + pci_read_config_dword(doe_mb->pdev, doe_mb->cap_offset, &hdr); > > do { > int rc; > u16 vid; > u8 prot; > > - rc = pci_doe_discovery(doe_mb, &index, &vid, &prot); > + rc = pci_doe_discovery(doe_mb, PCI_EXT_CAP_VER(hdr), &index, &vid, &prot); > if (rc) > return rc; > > -- > 2.41.0 >
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h b/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h index a39193213ff2..fbca743b2b86 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h @@ -1144,6 +1144,7 @@ #define PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_HEADER_2_LENGTH 0x0003ffff #define PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_REQ_3_INDEX 0x000000ff +#define PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_REQ_3_VER 0x0000ff00 #define PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_RSP_3_VID 0x0000ffff #define PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_RSP_3_PROTOCOL 0x00ff0000 #define PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_RSP_3_NEXT_INDEX 0xff000000 diff --git a/drivers/pci/doe.c b/drivers/pci/doe.c index 61f0531d2b1d..c94c2b0767f3 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/doe.c +++ b/drivers/pci/doe.c @@ -381,11 +381,13 @@ static void pci_doe_task_complete(struct pci_doe_task *task) complete(task->private); } -static int pci_doe_discovery(struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb, u8 *index, u16 *vid, +static int pci_doe_discovery(struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb, u8 capver, u8 *index, u16 *vid, u8 *protocol) { u32 request_pl = FIELD_PREP(PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_REQ_3_INDEX, - *index); + *index) | + FIELD_PREP(PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_REQ_3_VER, + (capver >= 2) ? 2 : 0); __le32 request_pl_le = cpu_to_le32(request_pl); __le32 response_pl_le; u32 response_pl; @@ -419,13 +421,16 @@ static int pci_doe_cache_protocols(struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb) { u8 index = 0; u8 xa_idx = 0; + u32 hdr = 0; + + pci_read_config_dword(doe_mb->pdev, doe_mb->cap_offset, &hdr); do { int rc; u16 vid; u8 prot; - rc = pci_doe_discovery(doe_mb, &index, &vid, &prot); + rc = pci_doe_discovery(doe_mb, PCI_EXT_CAP_VER(hdr), &index, &vid, &prot); if (rc) return rc;
PCIe r6.1, sec 6.30.1.1 defines a "DOE Discovery Version" field in the DOE Discovery Request Data Object Contents (3rd DW) as: 15:8 DOE Discovery Version – must be 02h if the Capability Version in the Data Object Exchange Extended Capability is 02h or greater. Add support for the version on devices with the DOE v2 capability. Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@amd.com> --- Changes: v3: * updated subject line * dropped "DISCOVER_" from the new field macro v2: * added the section number to the commit log --- include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h | 1 + drivers/pci/doe.c | 11 ++++++++--- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)