| Message ID | 20200730033747.18931-3-mark.tomlinson@alliedtelesis.co.nz |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [1/3] PCI: iproc: Add bus number parameter to read/write functions | expand |
On 7/29/2020 8:37 PM, Mark Tomlinson wrote: > The core interrupt code expects the irq_set_affinity call to update the > effective affinity for the interrupt. This was not being done, so update > iproc_msi_irq_set_affinity() to do so. > > Signed-off-by: Mark Tomlinson <mark.tomlinson@alliedtelesis.co.nz> > --- > drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-msi.c | 13 +++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-msi.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-msi.c > index 3176ad3ab0e5..908475d27e0e 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-msi.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-msi.c > @@ -209,15 +209,20 @@ static int iproc_msi_irq_set_affinity(struct irq_data *data, > struct iproc_msi *msi = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data); > int target_cpu = cpumask_first(mask); > int curr_cpu; > + int ret; > > curr_cpu = hwirq_to_cpu(msi, data->hwirq); > if (curr_cpu == target_cpu) > - return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE; > + ret = IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE; > + else { > + /* steer MSI to the target CPU */ > + data->hwirq = hwirq_to_canonical_hwirq(msi, data->hwirq) + target_cpu; > + ret = IRQ_SET_MASK_OK; > + } > > - /* steer MSI to the target CPU */ > - data->hwirq = hwirq_to_canonical_hwirq(msi, data->hwirq) + target_cpu; > + irq_data_update_effective_affinity(data, cpumask_of(target_cpu)); > > - return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK; > + return ret; > } > > static void iproc_msi_irq_compose_msi_msg(struct irq_data *data, > This change looks good to me. Thanks. Reviewed-by: Ray Jui <ray.jui@broadcom.com>
On 2020-07-29 8:37 p.m., Mark Tomlinson wrote: > The core interrupt code expects the irq_set_affinity call to update the > effective affinity for the interrupt. This was not being done, so update > iproc_msi_irq_set_affinity() to do so. > > Signed-off-by: Mark Tomlinson <mark.tomlinson@alliedtelesis.co.nz> Should this have a Fixes: added to it? > --- > drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-msi.c | 13 +++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-msi.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-msi.c > index 3176ad3ab0e5..908475d27e0e 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-msi.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-msi.c > @@ -209,15 +209,20 @@ static int iproc_msi_irq_set_affinity(struct irq_data *data, > struct iproc_msi *msi = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data); > int target_cpu = cpumask_first(mask); > int curr_cpu; > + int ret; > > curr_cpu = hwirq_to_cpu(msi, data->hwirq); > if (curr_cpu == target_cpu) > - return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE; > + ret = IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE; > + else { > + /* steer MSI to the target CPU */ > + data->hwirq = hwirq_to_canonical_hwirq(msi, data->hwirq) + target_cpu; > + ret = IRQ_SET_MASK_OK; > + } > > - /* steer MSI to the target CPU */ > - data->hwirq = hwirq_to_canonical_hwirq(msi, data->hwirq) + target_cpu; > + irq_data_update_effective_affinity(data, cpumask_of(target_cpu)); > > - return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK; > + return ret; > } > > static void iproc_msi_irq_compose_msi_msg(struct irq_data *data,
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-msi.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-msi.c index 3176ad3ab0e5..908475d27e0e 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-msi.c +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-msi.c @@ -209,15 +209,20 @@ static int iproc_msi_irq_set_affinity(struct irq_data *data, struct iproc_msi *msi = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data); int target_cpu = cpumask_first(mask); int curr_cpu; + int ret; curr_cpu = hwirq_to_cpu(msi, data->hwirq); if (curr_cpu == target_cpu) - return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE; + ret = IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE; + else { + /* steer MSI to the target CPU */ + data->hwirq = hwirq_to_canonical_hwirq(msi, data->hwirq) + target_cpu; + ret = IRQ_SET_MASK_OK; + } - /* steer MSI to the target CPU */ - data->hwirq = hwirq_to_canonical_hwirq(msi, data->hwirq) + target_cpu; + irq_data_update_effective_affinity(data, cpumask_of(target_cpu)); - return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK; + return ret; } static void iproc_msi_irq_compose_msi_msg(struct irq_data *data,
The core interrupt code expects the irq_set_affinity call to update the effective affinity for the interrupt. This was not being done, so update iproc_msi_irq_set_affinity() to do so. Signed-off-by: Mark Tomlinson <mark.tomlinson@alliedtelesis.co.nz> --- drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-msi.c | 13 +++++++++---- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)