diff mbox series

[4/9] PCI: armada8k: Drop unnecessary root_bus_nr setting

Message ID 1525844386-5433-4-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org
State Superseded
Delegated to: Lorenzo Pieralisi
Headers show
Series [1/9] PCI: exynos: Drop unnecessary root_bus_nr setting | expand

Commit Message

Shawn Guo May 9, 2018, 5:39 a.m. UTC
The root_bus_nr initialization has already been done in function
dw_pcie_host_init().  The -1 assignment in platform driver before
calling into dw_pcie_host_init() is not really needed.  Drop it.

Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
---
 drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-armada8k.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Thomas Petazzoni May 9, 2018, 7:29 a.m. UTC | #1
Hello Shawn,

On Wed,  9 May 2018 13:39:41 +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> The root_bus_nr initialization has already been done in function
> dw_pcie_host_init().

The formulation "has already been done" makes me think it's been done
*before* pp->root_bus_nr = -1, which is not what happens. I believe a
better formulation here would be:

dw_pcie_host_init() already initializes the root_bus_nr field of
'struct pcie_port', so there is no need to initialize it prior to
calling dw_pcie_host_init().

>  The -1 assignment in platform driver before
> calling into dw_pcie_host_init() is not really needed.  Drop it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
> Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>

Other than my comment on the commit log:

Acked-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>

Thanks!

Thomas
Shawn Guo May 9, 2018, 7:52 a.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 09:29:25AM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Hello Shawn,
> 
> On Wed,  9 May 2018 13:39:41 +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > The root_bus_nr initialization has already been done in function
> > dw_pcie_host_init().
> 
> The formulation "has already been done" makes me think it's been done
> *before* pp->root_bus_nr = -1, which is not what happens. I believe a
> better formulation here would be:
> 
> dw_pcie_host_init() already initializes the root_bus_nr field of
> 'struct pcie_port', so there is no need to initialize it prior to
> calling dw_pcie_host_init().

Yes, this is better.  I will improve the commit log as suggested.
Thanks.

> 
> >  The -1 assignment in platform driver before
> > calling into dw_pcie_host_init() is not really needed.  Drop it.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
> > Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
> 
> Other than my comment on the commit log:
> 
> Acked-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>

Thanks.

Shawn
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-armada8k.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-armada8k.c
index b587352f8b9f..2d8eb88fd4f8 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-armada8k.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-armada8k.c
@@ -171,7 +171,6 @@  static int armada8k_add_pcie_port(struct armada8k_pcie *pcie,
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
 	int ret;
 
-	pp->root_bus_nr = -1;
 	pp->ops = &armada8k_pcie_host_ops;
 
 	pp->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);