mbox series

[v2,0/2] dt-bindings: PCI: ti,j721e-pci-*: resolve unexpected property warnings

Message ID 20220924223517.123343-1-mranostay@ti.com
Headers show
Series dt-bindings: PCI: ti,j721e-pci-*: resolve unexpected property warnings | expand

Message

Matt Ranostay Sept. 24, 2022, 10:35 p.m. UTC
Resolve unexpected property warnings related to interrupts in both J721E PCI EP and host
yaml files.

Changes from v1:
* Fix typo in commit message
* Add missing Cc to maintainers

Matt Ranostay (2):
  dt-bindings: PCI: ti,j721e-pci-host: add interrupt controller
    definition
  dt-bindings: PCI: ti,j721e-pci-*: Add missing interrupt properties

 .../bindings/pci/ti,j721e-pci-ep.yaml         |  7 +++++++
 .../bindings/pci/ti,j721e-pci-host.yaml       | 20 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+)

Comments

Krzysztof Kozlowski Sept. 25, 2022, 9:21 a.m. UTC | #1
On 25/09/2022 00:35, Matt Ranostay wrote:
> Resolve unexpected property warnings related to interrupts in both J721E PCI EP and host
> yaml files.
> 

Thanks for cc-ing. On what tree do you base your patch? Looks like
something old. If so, you need to rebase to some recent kernel.

Best regards,
Krzysztof
Matt Ranostay Sept. 26, 2022, 3:06 a.m. UTC | #2
On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 11:21:02AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 25/09/2022 00:35, Matt Ranostay wrote:
> > Resolve unexpected property warnings related to interrupts in both J721E PCI EP and host
> > yaml files.
> > 
> 
> Thanks for cc-ing. On what tree do you base your patch? Looks like
> something old. If so, you need to rebase to some recent kernel.
>

It was on linux-next from Sep 23rd. So would seem odd if the rebasing seems
from an older tree. 

- Matt

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Krzysztof Kozlowski Sept. 26, 2022, 6:18 a.m. UTC | #3
On 26/09/2022 05:06, Matt Ranostay wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 11:21:02AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 25/09/2022 00:35, Matt Ranostay wrote:
>>> Resolve unexpected property warnings related to interrupts in both J721E PCI EP and host
>>> yaml files.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for cc-ing. On what tree do you base your patch? Looks like
>> something old. If so, you need to rebase to some recent kernel.
>>
> 
> It was on linux-next from Sep 23rd. So would seem odd if the rebasing seems
> from an older tree. 
That's good, but then why you did not use scripts/get_maintainers.pl as
I asked...

Best regards,
Krzysztof