From patchwork Thu Jul 28 19:14:58 2011 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Belisko Marek X-Patchwork-Id: 107296 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:4978:20e::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABFC9B6F64 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 05:15:38 +1000 (EST) Received: from canuck.infradead.org ([2001:4978:20e::1]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1QmW30-0004pf-Hi; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 19:15:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=canuck.infradead.org) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1QmW30-0007bj-1D; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 19:15:06 +0000 Received: from mail-vw0-f49.google.com ([209.85.212.49]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1QmW2w-0007bN-SY for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 19:15:04 +0000 Received: by vws8 with SMTP id 8so2499722vws.36 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:14:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7x+w4YdiWkTGOepaJzNpRYlnzoRMSVly6wkwB7O2T80=; b=kQdUi25L7+dVbVFI5P5gh4AjsroJJ2jAa4i4WYYeXBu2RasaIctKvE9Y4CAwLM2cft frsODYBp5wby0zMmUFXXWVvs55xowxyb0XA7uAgS1VkQ5Ig016vr64KK+4VUvWuKwB/o 4B7pMXc1GA9zyHZPagOcO71TCGbFmB3kvmIiE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.175.74 with SMTP id by10mr394011vdc.286.1311880499007; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:14:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.184.65 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:14:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E3131AE.7010408@free-electrons.com> References: <4E3131AE.7010408@free-electrons.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 21:14:58 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Flash filesystems benchmarks From: Belisko Marek To: David Wagner X-CRM114-Version: 20090807-BlameThorstenAndJenny ( TRE 0.7.6 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20110728_151503_140429_07CCD5A2 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 18.10 ) X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.3.1 on canuck.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-0.8 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (marek.belisko[at]gmail.com) -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.212.49 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Cc: "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , tim.bird@am.sony.com, Linux Embedded X-BeenThere: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-mtd-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org Hi, On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:53 AM, David Wagner wrote: >        Hello, > > As a contract with the CELF, we (Free Electrons) developed a flash > filesystem benchmarking suite ; it tests ubifs, jffs2, yaffs2 and > squashfs(over UBI+two different block transition layers). It has been > run on a Calao USB-9263 board and a IGEPv2 board and on 2.6.38, .39 and > 3.0 kernels. > > The results are shown as histograms and two different reportings exists: >  * filesystem comparison for a given board/kernel couple >  * kernel comparison for a given board/filesystem couple > > All the details are to be found at: >        http://elinux.org/Flash_Filesystem_Benchmarks > Direct link to the test protocol: >        http://elinux.org/Flash_Filesystem_Benchmarks_Protocol > Link to the gitorious page: >        https://gitorious.org/ffs-benchmarks/ffs-benchmarks > > Reviews of the test protocol, pointers to incoherent results or any > other comment is welcome. > We will keep posting more results. Great job ;). Maybe small README how to use scripts. I try to run ./performance-test.py but got en error because test.cfg doesn't exist. Shouldn't there be input argument for specific board something like: > > >        David Wagner > > -- > David Wagner, Free Electrons > Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux > development, consulting, training and support. > http://free-electrons.com > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-embedded" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > thanks, marek diff --git a/performance-tests.py b/performance-tests.py index 78c83f0..33a4292 100755 --- a/performance-tests.py +++ b/performance-tests.py @@ -168,7 +168,12 @@ def main(): global cur cfg = ConfigParser.ConfigParser() - cfg.read('test.cfg') + + if (len(sys.argv) < 2): + print "board configuration parameter missing!!!" + return + + cfg.read(sys.argv[1]) board_name = cfg.defaults()['board_name'] version = cfg.defaults()['version']