@@ -2549,6 +2549,7 @@ static int cfi_intelext_suspend(struct mtd_info *mtd)
anyway? The latter for now. */
printk(KERN_NOTICE "Flash device refused suspend due to active operation (state %d)\n", chip->state);
ret = -EAGAIN;
+ break;
case FL_PM_SUSPENDED:
break;
}
@@ -902,6 +902,7 @@ static int get_chip(struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip, unsigned long adr
/* Someone else might have been playing with it. */
goto retry;
}
+ return 0;
case FL_READY:
case FL_CFI_QUERY:
@@ -2994,6 +2995,7 @@ static int cfi_amdstd_suspend(struct mtd_info *mtd)
* as the whole point is that nobody can do anything
* with the chip now anyway.
*/
+ break;
case FL_PM_SUSPENDED:
break;
@@ -1332,6 +1332,8 @@ static int cfi_staa_suspend(struct mtd_info *mtd)
* as the whole point is that nobody can do anything
* with the chip now anyway.
*/
+ break;
+
case FL_PM_SUSPENDED:
break;
In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix multiple warnings by explicitly adding multiple break statements and a return instead of letting the code fall through to the next case. Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> --- drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0001.c | 1 + drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c | 2 ++ drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0020.c | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+)