From patchwork Wed Feb 7 20:22:54 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: William Zhang X-Patchwork-Id: 1896323 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=Yq6geder; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=broadcom.com header.i=@broadcom.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=dkimrelay header.b=mh5eTHW3; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org (client-ip=2607:7c80:54:3::133; helo=bombadil.infradead.org; envelope-from=linux-mtd-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TVWnf5B8jz23hf for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2024 07:25:10 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=+VMu3x+4/8MU9J8CN+vmvbl9fj6pa86YcNdWXlnMWCs=; b=Yq6gedereAY5Kw pu0xO7CGy4YGpCew4+wYFkE79ALlughlQtannO6YWHN/ZM6ut+BhKBzBLmZ4O/Xq2GGpRVGMDdiXJ MT2nvBGZHZF7VeU8iutqm8AwqB2/pSXPOCzCoF/VNpmM5jmUftGsDfaaTeUFOTG+YFlSHoPJ8YKSj MZp0/RuGDwv6/ji88KnOfzUAkzQ97zTXebtcKIYu3W6NBdNbjSzP12kqDWlq0oLkFIpmT6bc+uZv2 7IGzWe4MnitNW65NpTfBSfrDISTGIk420AHOM4qmreueiZl9WuQ9lMce0jGo7s5HDL2egSYivNti3 b6WgHuiPrmzsDS+U88Ow==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rXoTa-0000000Biy0-0Fcj; Wed, 07 Feb 2024 20:24:58 +0000 Received: from lpdvsmtp09.broadcom.com ([192.19.166.228] helo=relay.smtp-ext.broadcom.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rXoSm-0000000BiLR-2OaH; Wed, 07 Feb 2024 20:24:17 +0000 Received: from mail-lvn-it-01.lvn.broadcom.net (mail-lvn-it-01.lvn.broadcom.net [10.36.132.253]) by relay.smtp-ext.broadcom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCBC9C0094CA; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 12:24:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 relay.smtp-ext.broadcom.com DCBC9C0094CA DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=broadcom.com; s=dkimrelay; t=1707337447; bh=1Yh76Q4bafQj8j8zmFp3LQ71wEoIHitjS2PH4qKEFkw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=mh5eTHW3ecA8+Yd5hfuEAI6bzxkyankIbx4jjFcQK5LNCrnYe8YT5HgfHSByl+OMW Mp5X/1wxKS8XM0lm4MxP1zUwOTvZidsNnkB7frF+6AMMmquNlUHUixMkQG7g48gmMa JsPb7d+uovlY1Q9FMVvmDNaIDFxEzDT8Y2mSBMTE= Received: from bcacpedev-irv-3.lvn.broadcom.net (bcacpedev-irv-3.lvn.broadcom.net [10.173.232.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail-lvn-it-01.lvn.broadcom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6B45618041CAC4; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 12:24:06 -0800 (PST) From: William Zhang To: Linux MTD List , Linux ARM List , Broadcom Kernel List Cc: f.fainelli@gmail.com, kursad.oney@broadcom.com, joel.peshkin@broadcom.com, anand.gore@broadcom.com, dregan@mail.com, kamal.dasu@broadcom.com, tomer.yacoby@broadcom.com, dan.beygelman@broadcom.com, William Zhang , David Regan , Miquel Raynal , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vignesh Raghavendra , Brian Norris , Richard Weinberger Subject: [PATCH v5 09/12] mtd: rawnand: brcmnand: Add support for getting ecc setting from strap Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 12:22:54 -0800 Message-Id: <20240207202257.271784-10-william.zhang@broadcom.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.37.3 In-Reply-To: <20240207202257.271784-1-william.zhang@broadcom.com> References: <20240207202257.271784-1-william.zhang@broadcom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240207_122409_112413_379198A9 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 21.54 ) X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "bombadil.infradead.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: BCMBCA broadband SoC based board design does not specify ecc setting in dts but rather use the SoC NAND strap info to obtain the ecc strength and spare area size setting. Add brcm,nand-ecc-use-strap d [...] Content analysis details: (-0.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 SPF_NONE SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. -0.1 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH DKIMwl.org - High trust sender X-BeenThere: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-mtd" Errors-To: linux-mtd-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org BCMBCA broadband SoC based board design does not specify ecc setting in dts but rather use the SoC NAND strap info to obtain the ecc strength and spare area size setting. Add brcm,nand-ecc-use-strap dts propety for this purpose and update driver to support this option. The generic nand ecc settings still take precedence over this flag. For example, if nand-ecc-strength is set in the dts, the driver ignores the strap setting and falls back to original behavior. This makes sure that the existing BCMBCA board dts still works the old way even the strap flag is set in the BCMBCA chip dtsi. Signed-off-by: William Zhang Reviewed-by: David Regan --- Changes in v5: None Changes in v4: - Update the comments for ecc setting selection Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: - Minor cosmetic fixes drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c index 73fdf7ce21aa..efeee9e80213 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c @@ -1038,6 +1038,19 @@ static inline int brcmnand_sector_1k_shift(struct brcmnand_controller *ctrl) return -1; } +static int brcmnand_get_sector_size_1k(struct brcmnand_host *host) +{ + struct brcmnand_controller *ctrl = host->ctrl; + int shift = brcmnand_sector_1k_shift(ctrl); + u16 acc_control_offs = brcmnand_cs_offset(ctrl, host->cs, + BRCMNAND_CS_ACC_CONTROL); + + if (shift < 0) + return 0; + + return (nand_readreg(ctrl, acc_control_offs) >> shift) & 0x1; +} + static void brcmnand_set_sector_size_1k(struct brcmnand_host *host, int val) { struct brcmnand_controller *ctrl = host->ctrl; @@ -1055,6 +1068,38 @@ static void brcmnand_set_sector_size_1k(struct brcmnand_host *host, int val) nand_writereg(ctrl, acc_control_offs, tmp); } +static int brcmnand_get_spare_size(struct brcmnand_host *host) +{ + struct brcmnand_controller *ctrl = host->ctrl; + u16 acc_control_offs = brcmnand_cs_offset(ctrl, host->cs, + BRCMNAND_CS_ACC_CONTROL); + u32 acc = nand_readreg(ctrl, acc_control_offs); + + return (acc & brcmnand_spare_area_mask(ctrl)); +} + +static int brcmnand_get_ecc_strength(struct brcmnand_host *host) +{ + struct brcmnand_controller *ctrl = host->ctrl; + u16 acc_control_offs = brcmnand_cs_offset(ctrl, host->cs, + BRCMNAND_CS_ACC_CONTROL); + int sector_size_1k = brcmnand_get_sector_size_1k(host); + int spare_area_size, ecc_level, ecc_strength; + u32 acc; + + spare_area_size = brcmnand_get_spare_size(host); + acc = nand_readreg(ctrl, acc_control_offs); + ecc_level = (acc & brcmnand_ecc_level_mask(ctrl)) >> ctrl->ecc_level_shift; + if (sector_size_1k) + ecc_strength = ecc_level * 2; + else if (spare_area_size == 16 && ecc_level == 15) + ecc_strength = 1; /* hamming */ + else + ecc_strength = ecc_level; + + return ecc_strength; +} + /*********************************************************************** * CS_NAND_SELECT ***********************************************************************/ @@ -2622,19 +2667,43 @@ static int brcmnand_setup_dev(struct brcmnand_host *host) nanddev_get_memorg(&chip->base); struct brcmnand_controller *ctrl = host->ctrl; struct brcmnand_cfg *cfg = &host->hwcfg; - char msg[128]; + struct device_node *np = nand_get_flash_node(chip); u32 offs, tmp, oob_sector; - int ret; + int ret, sector_size_1k = 0; + bool use_strap = false; + char msg[128]; memset(cfg, 0, sizeof(*cfg)); + use_strap = of_property_read_bool(np, "brcm,nand-ecc-use-strap"); - ret = of_property_read_u32(nand_get_flash_node(chip), - "brcm,nand-oob-sector-size", + /* + * Set ECC size and strength based on hw configuration from strap + * if brcm,nand-ecc-use-strap is set. However if nand-ecc-strength + * is set, its value will be used and ignore the strap setting. + */ + if (chip->ecc.strength) + use_strap = 0; + + if (use_strap) { + chip->ecc.strength = brcmnand_get_ecc_strength(host); + sector_size_1k = brcmnand_get_sector_size_1k(host); + if (chip->ecc.size == 0) { + if (sector_size_1k < 0) + chip->ecc.size = 512; + else + chip->ecc.size = 512 << sector_size_1k; + } + } + + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "brcm,nand-oob-sector-size", &oob_sector); if (ret) { - /* Use detected size */ - cfg->spare_area_size = mtd->oobsize / - (mtd->writesize >> FC_SHIFT); + if (use_strap) + cfg->spare_area_size = brcmnand_get_spare_size(host); + else + /* Use detected size */ + cfg->spare_area_size = mtd->oobsize / + (mtd->writesize >> FC_SHIFT); } else { cfg->spare_area_size = oob_sector; }