From patchwork Tue Sep 6 06:00:30 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Liang Yang X-Patchwork-Id: 1674495 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org (client-ip=2607:7c80:54:3::133; helo=bombadil.infradead.org; envelope-from=linux-mtd-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=RcZn43R9; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4MMFCP42b3z1yhd for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2022 16:02:09 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:CC:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=B06mfXndQgsN4OvqFWbT1lLybnKneRkv6BL2gVEyzTM=; b=RcZn43R991xtRC p69QoyX8gC5Cq9xTUHuoBOMF+SRl582EnsKC7+o5oZ+1J8BVm3uFyFa+A0ypVunjdn4OYyvPdZeK1 s2dMu81i1TbFg5QhNaibMe+A+zWyCRMRvDzeT7wSE5a7uZ9R7ENzm7D7rQt0q4uLwMxRuhOlh/PZR Sx5ad06Y02fHeY4/0aFAdydEtQ+H6oKbs8uciopaqVWR9iDLmFmk0tLCLHv1R8mYbgQpLstJ1Umnz n9xPJ1k39t9puQjF5vTvN0FzncoHh2aMLHY4MPPnzQFpf2RQBuNXcVSZ0uFBG0CBojewpTyEmLvkz r50XASJMrbVc8VkEkdxA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oVReE-00AC3q-6f; Tue, 06 Sep 2022 06:01:22 +0000 Received: from mail-sz.amlogic.com ([211.162.65.117]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oVRdf-00ABbH-W4; Tue, 06 Sep 2022 06:00:50 +0000 Received: from droid11-sz.amlogic.com (10.28.8.21) by mail-sz.amlogic.com (10.28.11.5) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.1.2507.6; Tue, 6 Sep 2022 14:00:39 +0800 From: Liang Yang To: Miquel Raynal , CC: Liang Yang , Kevin Hilman , Rob Herring , Richard Weinberger , Vignesh Raghavendra , Jerome Brunet , Neil Armstrong , Martin Blumenstingl , Jianxin Pan , Victor Wan , XianWei Zhao , Kelvin Zhang , BiChao Zheng , YongHui Yu , , , , Subject: [PATCH RESEND v8 2/5] mtd: rawnand: meson: fix the clock Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2022 14:00:30 +0800 Message-ID: <20220906060034.2528-3-liang.yang@amlogic.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20220906060034.2528-1-liang.yang@amlogic.com> References: <20220906060034.2528-1-liang.yang@amlogic.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.28.8.21] X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220905_230048_190825_2B58BE42 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.72 ) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "bombadil.infradead.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: EMMC and NAND have the same clock control register named 'SD_EMMC_CLOCK' which is defined in EMMC port internally. bit0~5 of 'SD_EMMC_CLOCK' is the divider and bit6~7 is the mux for fix pll and xtal. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record X-BeenThere: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-mtd" Errors-To: linux-mtd-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org EMMC and NAND have the same clock control register named 'SD_EMMC_CLOCK' which is defined in EMMC port internally. bit0~5 of 'SD_EMMC_CLOCK' is the divider and bit6~7 is the mux for fix pll and xtal. At the beginning, a common MMC and NAND sub-clock was discussed and planed to be implemented as NFC clock provider, but now this series of patches of a common MMC and NAND sub-clock are never being accepted. the reasons for giving up are: 1. EMMC and NAND, which are mutually exclusive anyway 2. coupling the EMMC and NAND. 3. it seems that a common MMC and NAND sub-clock is over engineered. and let us see the link fot more information: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220121074508.42168-5-liang.yang@amlogic.com so The meson nfc can't work now, let us rework the clock. Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman Signed-off-by: Liang Yang --- drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c | 82 +++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c index ac3be92872d0..cc93667a1e7f 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include @@ -56,6 +57,9 @@ #define NFC_RB_IRQ_EN BIT(21) +#define CLK_DIV_SHIFT 0 +#define CLK_DIV_WIDTH 6 + #define CMDRWGEN(cmd_dir, ran, bch, short_mode, page_size, pages) \ ( \ (cmd_dir) | \ @@ -151,15 +155,15 @@ struct meson_nfc { struct nand_controller controller; struct clk *core_clk; struct clk *device_clk; - struct clk *phase_tx; - struct clk *phase_rx; + struct clk *nand_clk; + struct clk_divider nand_divider; unsigned long clk_rate; u32 bus_timing; struct device *dev; void __iomem *reg_base; - struct regmap *reg_clk; + void __iomem *reg_clk; struct completion completion; struct list_head chips; const struct meson_nfc_data *data; @@ -235,7 +239,7 @@ static void meson_nfc_select_chip(struct nand_chip *nand, int chip) nfc->timing.tbers_max = meson_chip->tbers_max; if (nfc->clk_rate != meson_chip->clk_rate) { - ret = clk_set_rate(nfc->device_clk, meson_chip->clk_rate); + ret = clk_set_rate(nfc->nand_clk, meson_chip->clk_rate); if (ret) { dev_err(nfc->dev, "failed to set clock rate\n"); return; @@ -987,6 +991,8 @@ static const struct mtd_ooblayout_ops meson_ooblayout_ops = { static int meson_nfc_clk_init(struct meson_nfc *nfc) { + struct clk_parent_data nfc_divider_parent_data[1]; + struct clk_init_data init = {0}; int ret; /* request core clock */ @@ -1002,21 +1008,28 @@ static int meson_nfc_clk_init(struct meson_nfc *nfc) return PTR_ERR(nfc->device_clk); } - nfc->phase_tx = devm_clk_get(nfc->dev, "tx"); - if (IS_ERR(nfc->phase_tx)) { - dev_err(nfc->dev, "failed to get TX clk\n"); - return PTR_ERR(nfc->phase_tx); - } - - nfc->phase_rx = devm_clk_get(nfc->dev, "rx"); - if (IS_ERR(nfc->phase_rx)) { - dev_err(nfc->dev, "failed to get RX clk\n"); - return PTR_ERR(nfc->phase_rx); - } + init.name = devm_kasprintf(nfc->dev, + GFP_KERNEL, "%s#div", + dev_name(nfc->dev)); + init.ops = &clk_divider_ops; + nfc_divider_parent_data[0].fw_name = "device"; + init.parent_data = nfc_divider_parent_data; + init.num_parents = 1; + nfc->nand_divider.reg = nfc->reg_clk; + nfc->nand_divider.shift = CLK_DIV_SHIFT; + nfc->nand_divider.width = CLK_DIV_WIDTH; + nfc->nand_divider.hw.init = &init; + nfc->nand_divider.flags = CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED | + CLK_DIVIDER_ROUND_CLOSEST | + CLK_DIVIDER_ALLOW_ZERO; + + nfc->nand_clk = devm_clk_register(nfc->dev, &nfc->nand_divider.hw); + if (IS_ERR(nfc->nand_clk)) + return PTR_ERR(nfc->nand_clk); /* init SD_EMMC_CLOCK to sane defaults w/min clock rate */ - regmap_update_bits(nfc->reg_clk, - 0, CLK_SELECT_NAND, CLK_SELECT_NAND); + writel(CLK_SELECT_NAND | readl(nfc->reg_clk), + nfc->reg_clk); ret = clk_prepare_enable(nfc->core_clk); if (ret) { @@ -1030,29 +1043,21 @@ static int meson_nfc_clk_init(struct meson_nfc *nfc) goto err_device_clk; } - ret = clk_prepare_enable(nfc->phase_tx); + ret = clk_prepare_enable(nfc->nand_clk); if (ret) { - dev_err(nfc->dev, "failed to enable TX clock\n"); - goto err_phase_tx; + dev_err(nfc->dev, "pre enable NFC divider fail\n"); + goto err_nand_clk; } - ret = clk_prepare_enable(nfc->phase_rx); - if (ret) { - dev_err(nfc->dev, "failed to enable RX clock\n"); - goto err_phase_rx; - } - - ret = clk_set_rate(nfc->device_clk, 24000000); + ret = clk_set_rate(nfc->nand_clk, 24000000); if (ret) - goto err_disable_rx; + goto err_disable_clk; return 0; -err_disable_rx: - clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->phase_rx); -err_phase_rx: - clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->phase_tx); -err_phase_tx: +err_disable_clk: + clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->nand_clk); +err_nand_clk: clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->device_clk); err_device_clk: clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->core_clk); @@ -1061,8 +1066,7 @@ static int meson_nfc_clk_init(struct meson_nfc *nfc) static void meson_nfc_disable_clk(struct meson_nfc *nfc) { - clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->phase_rx); - clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->phase_tx); + clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->nand_clk); clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->device_clk); clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->core_clk); } @@ -1396,13 +1400,9 @@ static int meson_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (IS_ERR(nfc->reg_base)) return PTR_ERR(nfc->reg_base); - nfc->reg_clk = - syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(dev->of_node, - "amlogic,mmc-syscon"); - if (IS_ERR(nfc->reg_clk)) { - dev_err(dev, "Failed to lookup clock base\n"); + nfc->reg_clk = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "emmc"); + if (IS_ERR(nfc->reg_clk)) return PTR_ERR(nfc->reg_clk); - } irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); if (irq < 0)