diff mbox series

[v6,3/3] mtd: rawnand: Add support for secure regions in NAND memory

Message ID 20210318124342.32745-4-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org
State Changes Requested
Delegated to: Miquel Raynal
Headers show
Series Add support for secure regions in NAND | expand

Commit Message

Manivannan Sadhasivam March 18, 2021, 12:43 p.m. UTC
On a typical end product, a vendor may choose to secure some regions in
the NAND memory which are supposed to stay intact between FW upgrades.
The access to those regions will be blocked by a secure element like
Trustzone. So the normal world software like Linux kernel should not
touch these regions (including reading).

The regions are declared using a NAND chip DT property,
"secure-regions". So let's make use of this property in the raw NAND
core and skip access to the secure regions present in a system.

Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c | 111 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h      |   4 ++
 2 files changed, 115 insertions(+)

Comments

kernel test robot March 18, 2021, 2:45 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Manivannan,

I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on mtd/mtd/next]
[also build test WARNING on mtd/mtd/fixes mtd/nand/next v5.12-rc3 next-20210318]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Manivannan-Sadhasivam/Add-support-for-secure-regions-in-NAND/20210318-204636
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mtd/linux.git mtd/next
config: arm-randconfig-r023-20210318 (attached as .config)
compiler: clang version 13.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 6db3ab2903f42712f44000afb5aa467efbd25f35)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # install arm cross compiling tool for clang build
        # apt-get install binutils-arm-linux-gnueabi
        # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/045edb4991f99260412ca8ecbcbf1f41fcd30941
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review Manivannan-Sadhasivam/Add-support-for-secure-regions-in-NAND/20210318-204636
        git checkout 045edb4991f99260412ca8ecbcbf1f41fcd30941
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=arm 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c:4255:52: warning: variable 'len' is uninitialized when used here [-Wuninitialized]
           ret = nand_check_secure_region(chip, instr->addr, len);
                                                             ^~~
   drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c:4245:12: note: initialize the variable 'len' to silence this warning
           loff_t len;
                     ^
                      = 0
   1 warning generated.


vim +/len +4255 drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c

  4232	
  4233	/**
  4234	 * nand_erase_nand - [INTERN] erase block(s)
  4235	 * @chip: NAND chip object
  4236	 * @instr: erase instruction
  4237	 * @allowbbt: allow erasing the bbt area
  4238	 *
  4239	 * Erase one ore more blocks.
  4240	 */
  4241	int nand_erase_nand(struct nand_chip *chip, struct erase_info *instr,
  4242			    int allowbbt)
  4243	{
  4244		int page, pages_per_block, ret, chipnr;
  4245		loff_t len;
  4246	
  4247		pr_debug("%s: start = 0x%012llx, len = %llu\n",
  4248				__func__, (unsigned long long)instr->addr,
  4249				(unsigned long long)instr->len);
  4250	
  4251		if (check_offs_len(chip, instr->addr, instr->len))
  4252			return -EINVAL;
  4253	
  4254		/* Check if the region is secured */
> 4255		ret = nand_check_secure_region(chip, instr->addr, len);
  4256		if (ret)
  4257			return ret;
  4258	
  4259		/* Grab the lock and see if the device is available */
  4260		ret = nand_get_device(chip);
  4261		if (ret)
  4262			return ret;
  4263	
  4264		/* Shift to get first page */
  4265		page = (int)(instr->addr >> chip->page_shift);
  4266		chipnr = (int)(instr->addr >> chip->chip_shift);
  4267	
  4268		/* Calculate pages in each block */
  4269		pages_per_block = 1 << (chip->phys_erase_shift - chip->page_shift);
  4270	
  4271		/* Select the NAND device */
  4272		nand_select_target(chip, chipnr);
  4273	
  4274		/* Check, if it is write protected */
  4275		if (nand_check_wp(chip)) {
  4276			pr_debug("%s: device is write protected!\n",
  4277					__func__);
  4278			ret = -EIO;
  4279			goto erase_exit;
  4280		}
  4281	
  4282		/* Loop through the pages */
  4283		len = instr->len;
  4284	
  4285		while (len) {
  4286			/* Check if we have a bad block, we do not erase bad blocks! */
  4287			if (nand_block_checkbad(chip, ((loff_t) page) <<
  4288						chip->page_shift, allowbbt)) {
  4289				pr_warn("%s: attempt to erase a bad block at page 0x%08x\n",
  4290					    __func__, page);
  4291				ret = -EIO;
  4292				goto erase_exit;
  4293			}
  4294	
  4295			/*
  4296			 * Invalidate the page cache, if we erase the block which
  4297			 * contains the current cached page.
  4298			 */
  4299			if (page <= chip->pagecache.page && chip->pagecache.page <
  4300			    (page + pages_per_block))
  4301				chip->pagecache.page = -1;
  4302	
  4303			ret = nand_erase_op(chip, (page & chip->pagemask) >>
  4304					    (chip->phys_erase_shift - chip->page_shift));
  4305			if (ret) {
  4306				pr_debug("%s: failed erase, page 0x%08x\n",
  4307						__func__, page);
  4308				instr->fail_addr =
  4309					((loff_t)page << chip->page_shift);
  4310				goto erase_exit;
  4311			}
  4312	
  4313			/* Increment page address and decrement length */
  4314			len -= (1ULL << chip->phys_erase_shift);
  4315			page += pages_per_block;
  4316	
  4317			/* Check, if we cross a chip boundary */
  4318			if (len && !(page & chip->pagemask)) {
  4319				chipnr++;
  4320				nand_deselect_target(chip);
  4321				nand_select_target(chip, chipnr);
  4322			}
  4323		}
  4324	
  4325		ret = 0;
  4326	erase_exit:
  4327	
  4328		/* Deselect and wake up anyone waiting on the device */
  4329		nand_deselect_target(chip);
  4330		nand_release_device(chip);
  4331	
  4332		/* Return more or less happy */
  4333		return ret;
  4334	}
  4335	

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
index c33fa1b1847f..d2958549ba46 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
@@ -278,11 +278,47 @@  static int nand_block_bad(struct nand_chip *chip, loff_t ofs)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/**
+ * nand_check_secure_region() - Check if the region is secured
+ * @chip: NAND chip object
+ * @offset: Offset of the region to check
+ * @size: Size of the region to check
+ *
+ * Checks if the region is secured by comparing the offset and size with the
+ * list of secure regions obtained from DT. Returns -EIO if the region is
+ * secured else 0.
+ */
+static int nand_check_secure_region(struct nand_chip *chip, loff_t offset, u32 size)
+{
+	int i, j;
+
+	/* Skip touching the secure regions if present */
+	for (i = 0, j = 0; i < chip->nr_secure_regions; i++, j += 2) {
+		/* First compare the start offset */
+		if (offset >= chip->secure_regions[j] &&
+		    (offset < chip->secure_regions[j] + chip->secure_regions[j + 1]))
+			return -EIO;
+		/* ...then offset + size */
+		else if (offset < chip->secure_regions[i] &&
+			 (offset + size) >= chip->secure_regions[i])
+			return -EIO;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int nand_isbad_bbm(struct nand_chip *chip, loff_t ofs)
 {
+	int ret;
+
 	if (chip->options & NAND_NO_BBM_QUIRK)
 		return 0;
 
+	/* Check if the region is secured */
+	ret = nand_check_secure_region(chip, ofs, 0);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
 	if (chip->legacy.block_bad)
 		return chip->legacy.block_bad(chip, ofs);
 
@@ -397,6 +433,11 @@  static int nand_do_write_oob(struct nand_chip *chip, loff_t to,
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
+	/* Check if the region is secured */
+	ret = nand_check_secure_region(chip, to, ops->ooblen);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
 	chipnr = (int)(to >> chip->chip_shift);
 
 	/*
@@ -565,6 +606,11 @@  static int nand_block_isreserved(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs)
 
 	if (!chip->bbt)
 		return 0;
+
+	/* Check if the region is secured */
+	if (nand_check_secure_region(chip, ofs, 0))
+		return -EIO;
+
 	/* Return info from the table */
 	return nand_isreserved_bbt(chip, ofs);
 }
@@ -2737,6 +2783,11 @@  static int nand_read_page_swecc(struct nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf,
 	uint8_t *ecc_code = chip->ecc.code_buf;
 	unsigned int max_bitflips = 0;
 
+	/* Check if the region is secured */
+	ret = nand_check_secure_region(chip, ((loff_t)page << chip->page_shift), 0);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
 	chip->ecc.read_page_raw(chip, buf, 1, page);
 
 	for (i = 0; eccsteps; eccsteps--, i += eccbytes, p += eccsize)
@@ -3127,6 +3178,11 @@  static int nand_do_read_ops(struct nand_chip *chip, loff_t from,
 	int retry_mode = 0;
 	bool ecc_fail = false;
 
+	/* Check if the region is secured */
+	ret = nand_check_secure_region(chip, from, readlen);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
 	chipnr = (int)(from >> chip->chip_shift);
 	nand_select_target(chip, chipnr);
 
@@ -3458,6 +3514,11 @@  static int nand_do_read_oob(struct nand_chip *chip, loff_t from,
 	pr_debug("%s: from = 0x%08Lx, len = %i\n",
 			__func__, (unsigned long long)from, readlen);
 
+	/* Check if the region is secured */
+	ret = nand_check_secure_region(chip, from, readlen);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
 	stats = mtd->ecc_stats;
 
 	len = mtd_oobavail(mtd, ops);
@@ -3709,6 +3770,11 @@  static int nand_write_page_swecc(struct nand_chip *chip, const uint8_t *buf,
 	uint8_t *ecc_calc = chip->ecc.calc_buf;
 	const uint8_t *p = buf;
 
+	/* Check if the region is secured */
+	ret = nand_check_secure_region(chip, ((loff_t)page << chip->page_shift), 0);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
 	/* Software ECC calculation */
 	for (i = 0; eccsteps; eccsteps--, i += eccbytes, p += eccsize)
 		chip->ecc.calculate(chip, p, &ecc_calc[i]);
@@ -3979,6 +4045,11 @@  static int nand_do_write_ops(struct nand_chip *chip, loff_t to,
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
+	/* Check if the region is secured */
+	ret = nand_check_secure_region(chip, to, writelen);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
 	column = to & (mtd->writesize - 1);
 
 	chipnr = (int)(to >> chip->chip_shift);
@@ -4180,6 +4251,11 @@  int nand_erase_nand(struct nand_chip *chip, struct erase_info *instr,
 	if (check_offs_len(chip, instr->addr, instr->len))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	/* Check if the region is secured */
+	ret = nand_check_secure_region(chip, instr->addr, len);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
 	/* Grab the lock and see if the device is available */
 	ret = nand_get_device(chip);
 	if (ret)
@@ -4995,10 +5071,32 @@  static bool of_get_nand_on_flash_bbt(struct device_node *np)
 	return of_property_read_bool(np, "nand-on-flash-bbt");
 }
 
+static int of_get_nand_secure_regions(struct nand_chip *chip)
+{
+	struct device_node *dn = nand_get_flash_node(chip);
+	struct property *prop;
+	int length, nr_elem;
+
+	prop = of_find_property(dn, "secure-regions", &length);
+	if (prop) {
+		nr_elem = length / sizeof(u64);
+		chip->nr_secure_regions = nr_elem / 2;
+
+		chip->secure_regions = kcalloc(nr_elem, sizeof(*chip->secure_regions), GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!chip->secure_regions)
+			return -ENOMEM;
+
+		of_property_read_u64_array(dn, "secure-regions", chip->secure_regions, nr_elem);
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int rawnand_dt_init(struct nand_chip *chip)
 {
 	struct nand_device *nand = mtd_to_nanddev(nand_to_mtd(chip));
 	struct device_node *dn = nand_get_flash_node(chip);
+	int ret;
 
 	if (!dn)
 		return 0;
@@ -5015,6 +5113,16 @@  static int rawnand_dt_init(struct nand_chip *chip)
 	of_get_nand_ecc_user_config(nand);
 	of_get_nand_ecc_legacy_user_config(chip);
 
+	/*
+	 * Look for secure regions in the NAND chip. These regions are supposed
+	 * to be protected by a secure element like Trustzone. So the read/write
+	 * accesses to these regions will be blocked in the runtime by this
+	 * driver.
+	 */
+	ret = of_get_nand_secure_regions(chip);
+	if (!ret)
+		return ret;
+
 	/*
 	 * If neither the user nor the NAND controller have requested a specific
 	 * ECC engine type, we will default to NAND_ECC_ENGINE_TYPE_ON_HOST.
@@ -6068,6 +6176,9 @@  void nand_cleanup(struct nand_chip *chip)
 	/* Free manufacturer priv data. */
 	nand_manufacturer_cleanup(chip);
 
+	/* Free secure regions data */
+	kfree(chip->secure_regions);
+
 	/* Free controller specific allocations after chip identification */
 	nand_detach(chip);
 
diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h b/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h
index 6b3240e44310..d385c4fe8b0f 100644
--- a/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h
+++ b/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h
@@ -1086,6 +1086,8 @@  struct nand_manufacturer {
  *          NAND Controller drivers should not modify this value, but they're
  *          allowed to read it.
  * @read_retries: The number of read retry modes supported
+ * @secure_regions: Array representing the secure regions
+ * @nr_secure_regions: Number of secure regions
  * @controller: The hardware controller	structure which is shared among multiple
  *              independent devices
  * @ecc: The ECC controller structure
@@ -1135,6 +1137,8 @@  struct nand_chip {
 	unsigned int suspended : 1;
 	int cur_cs;
 	int read_retries;
+	u64 *secure_regions;
+	u8 nr_secure_regions;
 
 	/* Externals */
 	struct nand_controller *controller;