From patchwork Mon Feb 5 23:21:17 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Boris Brezillon X-Patchwork-Id: 869626 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=none (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org (client-ip=65.50.211.133; helo=bombadil.infradead.org; envelope-from=linux-mtd-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="Zq7NN2K7"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [65.50.211.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3zb3XL3MDkz9sBW for ; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 10:22:26 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Cc:List-Subscribe: List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:References: In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=eBqsmYdEvBNgsJdjFq/ldrmMWaHJ+fThCvCiQ348jBo=; b=Zq7NN2K7xVp1gSSwt3kEwTUjfY Xzk6KhYZOTYANMoh/QyJEn89V0vAY/iCA5COYPUQG5ahvfJEoQEx3GKjxE0X9uBPEDvIML35LwmW/ sjmaAwmvOjDehaB/eFZPjQTvplsL80/bbWgaTQ58w7C/qnEZbVe0BdZM0/un4s1qkBHMJpFsUFTW+ UxwSB4XxjQb51QPpqqZUSQw22hEmm7ID0yFb19Sn0OSG3KsbDapUszRymmyALURH2+h8MBIS55yCM A6VsKBmOQsEXjFWNOQg9bdB5Vmo2B4IRXcFySRbIXw7rG7MMV4Os5wm00inkFHnMtHyz+wZUA95JK n1AKk/0A==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1eiq5c-0006Qt-P9; Mon, 05 Feb 2018 23:22:20 +0000 Received: from mail.free-electrons.com ([62.4.15.54]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1eiq5A-0005oD-7t for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2018 23:21:55 +0000 Received: by mail.free-electrons.com (Postfix, from userid 110) id 034D02075D; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 00:21:41 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on mail.free-electrons.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0 Received: from localhost.localdomain (91-160-177-164.subs.proxad.net [91.160.177.164]) by mail.free-electrons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 888212075F; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 00:21:30 +0100 (CET) From: Boris Brezillon To: David Woodhouse , Brian Norris , Boris Brezillon , Marek Vasut , Richard Weinberger , Cyrille Pitchen , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Mark Brown , linux-spi@vger.kernel.org Subject: [RFC PATCH 3/6] spi: bcm53xx: Implement the spi_mem interface Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 00:21:17 +0100 Message-Id: <20180205232120.5851-4-boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.14.1 In-Reply-To: <20180205232120.5851-1-boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> References: <20180205232120.5851-1-boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> X-Spam-Note: CRM114 invocation failed X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.1 on bombadil.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-1.9 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-BeenThere: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Yogesh Gaur , Vignesh R , Kamal Dasu , Peter Pan , Frieder Schrempf , =?utf-8?b?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= , Sourav Poddar MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: "linux-mtd" Errors-To: linux-mtd-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org From: Boris Brezillon The spi_mem interface is meant to replace the spi_flash_read() one. Implement the ->exec_op() method so that we can smoothly get rid of the old interface. Note that the current ->flash_read() implementation looks a bit fragile since it does not take the ->read_opcode passed by the spi-nor layer into account, which means if might not work with all kind of NORs. Anyway, I left the logic unchanged and added a few extra checks to make sure we're receiving something that looks like a NOR read operation. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon --- drivers/spi/spi-bcm53xx.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-bcm53xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-bcm53xx.c index 6e409eabe1c9..c681d432e26c 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi-bcm53xx.c +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-bcm53xx.c @@ -263,6 +263,40 @@ static int bcm53xxspi_transfer_one(struct spi_master *master, return 0; } +static int bcm53xxspi_exec_mem_op(struct spi_mem *mem, + const struct spi_mem_op *op) +{ + struct bcm53xxspi *b53spi = spi_master_get_devdata(mem->spi->master); + u32 from; + + /* + * FIXME: There's nothing in this driver programming the opcode and + * buswidth to be used when a read is done on the mmio window, but it + * seems to be used to access a SPI NOR device, so restrict access + * access to SPINOR_OP_READ commands. + */ + if (!op->data.nbytes || op->data.dir != SPI_MEM_DATA_IN || + op->addr.nbytes != 3 || op->cmd.opcode != 0x3) + return -ENOTSUPP; + + from = ((u32)op->addr.buf[0] << 16) | ((u32)op->addr.buf[1] << 8) | + op->addr.buf[2]; + + /* Return -ENOTSUPP so that the core can fall back to normal reads. */ + if (from + op->data.nbytes > BCM53XXSPI_FLASH_WINDOW) + return -ENOTSUPP; + + bcm53xxspi_enable_bspi(b53spi); + memcpy_fromio(op->data.buf.in, b53spi->mmio_base + from, + op->data.nbytes); + + return 0; +} + +static const struct spi_controller_mem_ops bcm53xxspi_mem_ops = { + .exec_op = bcm53xxspi_exec_mem_op, +}; + static int bcm53xxspi_flash_read(struct spi_device *spi, struct spi_flash_read_message *msg) { @@ -317,8 +351,10 @@ static int bcm53xxspi_bcma_probe(struct bcma_device *core) master->dev.of_node = dev->of_node; master->transfer_one = bcm53xxspi_transfer_one; - if (b53spi->mmio_base) + if (b53spi->mmio_base) { + master->mem_ops = &bcm53xxspi_mem_ops; master->spi_flash_read = bcm53xxspi_flash_read; + } bcma_set_drvdata(core, b53spi);