Message ID | 1484741452-27141-1-git-send-email-sebtx452@gmail.com |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Hi Sebastien, thanks, comments inline On 18/01/2017 13:10, Sebastien Decourriere wrote: > The purpose of this patch is to enable the software address endianness > swapping only when the in SoC EBU endianness swapping is disabled. > To perform this check, I look at Bit 30 of the EBU_CON_0 register. > Actually, the driver expects that the in SoC swapping is disabled. > This is the case with current bootloaders shuch as U-boot. But, > > I have a router which uses a proprietary bootloader which keeps > the in SoC swapping enabled. The SoC in this router is a vrx200 v1.2. > In this SoC version, I can keep the in SoC swapping without any problem. > > Signed-off-by: Sebastien Decourriere <sebtx452@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/mtd/maps/lantiq-flash.c | 12 ++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/maps/lantiq-flash.c b/drivers/mtd/maps/lantiq-flash.c > index c8febb3..a091efa 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/maps/lantiq-flash.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/maps/lantiq-flash.c > @@ -151,6 +151,11 @@ ltq_mtd_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > ltq_mtd->map->copy_to = ltq_copy_to; > > ltq_mtd->map->map_priv_1 = LTQ_NOR_PROBING; this line should be dropped > + /* We swap the addresses only if the EBU endianness swap is disabled */ > + if (ltq_ebu_r32(LTQ_EBU_BUSCON0) & BIT(30)) add a define for BIT(30) please and we should really check if this a v1.2 or newer. if my memory is correct this was a silicon bug inside v1.0 and v1.1 John > + ltq_mtd->map[i].map_priv_1 = LTQ_NOR_NORMAL; > + else > + ltq_mtd->map[i].map_priv_1 = LTQ_NOR_PROBING; > ltq_mtd->mtd = do_map_probe("cfi_probe", ltq_mtd->map); > ltq_mtd->map->map_priv_1 = LTQ_NOR_NORMAL; > > @@ -163,8 +168,11 @@ ltq_mtd_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > mtd_set_of_node(ltq_mtd->mtd, pdev->dev.of_node); > > cfi = ltq_mtd->map->fldrv_priv; > - cfi->addr_unlock1 ^= 1; > - cfi->addr_unlock2 ^= 1; > + /* We swap the addresses only if the EBU endianness swap is disabled */ > + if (!(ltq_ebu_r32(LTQ_EBU_BUSCON0) & BIT(30))) { > + cfi->addr_unlock1 ^= 1; > + cfi->addr_unlock2 ^= 1; > + } > > err = mtd_device_register(ltq_mtd->mtd, NULL, 0); > if (err) { >
Hi John, >> >> ltq_mtd->map->map_priv_1 = LTQ_NOR_PROBING; > > this line should be dropped Yes, I noticed this mistake. I fixed it but forgotten to add thix fix to my commit -_- >> + /* We swap the addresses only if the EBU endianness swap is disabled */ >> + if (ltq_ebu_r32(LTQ_EBU_BUSCON0) & BIT(30)) > > add a define for BIT(30) please and we should really check if this a > v1.2 or newer. if my memory is correct this was a silicon bug inside > v1.0 and v1.1 In my kernel (OpenWrt) boot log I have : [ 0.000000] Linux version 4.4.14 (qa@serveurQA) (gcc version 5.3.0 (OpenWrt GCC 5.3.0 50020) ) #150 SMP Tue Jan 17 09:18:24 UTC 2017 [ 0.000000] SoC: xRX200 rev 1.2 [ 0.000000] bootconsole [early0] enabled [ 0.000000] CPU0 revision is: 00019556 (MIPS 34Kc) It would be better to ensure that the SoC version is >= 1.2 (as this bug was fixed in this version). You can get more informations in my OpenWrt pull request : https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/321 Regards, Sebastien.
On 18/01/2017 14:48, Seb wrote: > Hi John, > > >>> >>> ltq_mtd->map->map_priv_1 = LTQ_NOR_PROBING; >> >> this line should be dropped > > Yes, I noticed this mistake. I fixed it but forgotten to add thix fix > to my commit -_- > >>> + /* We swap the addresses only if the EBU endianness swap is disabled */ >>> + if (ltq_ebu_r32(LTQ_EBU_BUSCON0) & BIT(30)) >> >> add a define for BIT(30) please and we should really check if this a >> v1.2 or newer. if my memory is correct this was a silicon bug inside >> v1.0 and v1.1 > > In my kernel (OpenWrt) boot log I have : > > [ 0.000000] Linux version 4.4.14 (qa@serveurQA) (gcc version 5.3.0 > (OpenWrt GCC 5.3.0 50020) ) #150 SMP Tue Jan 17 09:18:24 UTC 2017 > [ 0.000000] SoC: xRX200 rev 1.2 > [ 0.000000] bootconsole [early0] enabled > [ 0.000000] CPU0 revision is: 00019556 (MIPS 34Kc) > > It would be better to ensure that the SoC version is >= 1.2 (as this > bug was fixed in this version). the bug is also fixed on the 300 and 500 series chips, so we would want to check for that aswell. John > You can get more informations in my OpenWrt pull request : > > https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/321 > > > Regards, > > Sebastien. >
> the bug is also fixed on the 300 and 500 series chips, so we would want > to check for that aswell. > I added this to the begin of "ltq_mtd_probe" function: bool mtd_addr_swap; if ( ltq_ebu_r32(LTQ_EBU_BUSCON0) & EBU_ENDIAN_SWAP ) { switch (ltq_soc_type()) { case SOC_TYPE_VR9_2 : case SOC_TYPE_AR10 : mtd_addr_swap = false; break; default : mtd_addr_swap = true; } } else mtd_addr_swap = true; It's easier to add other architectures as needed. I tried it on my OpenWrt release, and got it working fine. Is it correct in this way ?
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/maps/lantiq-flash.c b/drivers/mtd/maps/lantiq-flash.c index c8febb3..a091efa 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/maps/lantiq-flash.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/maps/lantiq-flash.c @@ -151,6 +151,11 @@ ltq_mtd_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) ltq_mtd->map->copy_to = ltq_copy_to; ltq_mtd->map->map_priv_1 = LTQ_NOR_PROBING; + /* We swap the addresses only if the EBU endianness swap is disabled */ + if (ltq_ebu_r32(LTQ_EBU_BUSCON0) & BIT(30)) + ltq_mtd->map[i].map_priv_1 = LTQ_NOR_NORMAL; + else + ltq_mtd->map[i].map_priv_1 = LTQ_NOR_PROBING; ltq_mtd->mtd = do_map_probe("cfi_probe", ltq_mtd->map); ltq_mtd->map->map_priv_1 = LTQ_NOR_NORMAL; @@ -163,8 +168,11 @@ ltq_mtd_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) mtd_set_of_node(ltq_mtd->mtd, pdev->dev.of_node); cfi = ltq_mtd->map->fldrv_priv; - cfi->addr_unlock1 ^= 1; - cfi->addr_unlock2 ^= 1; + /* We swap the addresses only if the EBU endianness swap is disabled */ + if (!(ltq_ebu_r32(LTQ_EBU_BUSCON0) & BIT(30))) { + cfi->addr_unlock1 ^= 1; + cfi->addr_unlock2 ^= 1; + } err = mtd_device_register(ltq_mtd->mtd, NULL, 0); if (err) {
The purpose of this patch is to enable the software address endianness swapping only when the in SoC EBU endianness swapping is disabled. To perform this check, I look at Bit 30 of the EBU_CON_0 register. Actually, the driver expects that the in SoC swapping is disabled. This is the case with current bootloaders shuch as U-boot. But, I have a router which uses a proprietary bootloader which keeps the in SoC swapping enabled. The SoC in this router is a vrx200 v1.2. In this SoC version, I can keep the in SoC swapping without any problem. Signed-off-by: Sebastien Decourriere <sebtx452@gmail.com> --- drivers/mtd/maps/lantiq-flash.c | 12 ++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)