diff mbox

[RFC/PATCH,1/2] doc: bindings: Add bindings documentation for mtd otp nvmem

Message ID 1464211607-8843-2-git-send-email-moritz.fischer@ettus.com
State Superseded
Delegated to: Brian Norris
Headers show

Commit Message

Moritz Fischer May 25, 2016, 9:26 p.m. UTC
This commit adds documentation describing the bindings for
exposing mtd flash otp regions as nvmem providers via devicetree.

Signed-off-by: Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@ettus.com>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/mtd/otp-nvmem.txt          | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/otp-nvmem.txt

Comments

Boris Brezillon May 26, 2016, 8:04 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi Moritz,

On Wed, 25 May 2016 14:26:46 -0700
Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@ettus.com> wrote:

> This commit adds documentation describing the bindings for
> exposing mtd flash otp regions as nvmem providers via devicetree.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@ettus.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/mtd/otp-nvmem.txt          | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 62 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/otp-nvmem.txt
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/otp-nvmem.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/otp-nvmem.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..a83a7da
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/otp-nvmem.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
> +Representing OTP regions in devicetree
> +
> +OTP regions can be represented by sub-nodes of an mtd device.
> +
> +The partition table should be a subnode of the mtd node and should be names
> +'otp-partitions'. This node should have the following property:
> +
> +- compatible: (required) must be 'fixed-partitions'
> +
> +OTP regions are then defined in subnodes of the partitions node.
> +
> +Required properties for OTP regions:
> +- reg: The region's offset and size within the mtd device
> +
> +Optional properties:
> +- label: The label / name for this region. If ommited, the label is taken
> +  from the node name (excluding the unit address).
> +
> +Example:
> +
> +flash@0 {
> +	partitions {
> +		compatible = "fixed-partitions";
> +		#address-cells = <1>;
> +		#size-cells = <1>;
> +
> +		partition@0 {
> +			label = "uboot-spl";
> +			reg = <0x0 0xe0000>;
> +		};
> +		partition@1 {
> +			label = "uboot-env";
> +			reg = <0xe0000 0x20000>;
> +		};
> +		partition@2 {
> +			label = "uboot";
> +			reg = <0x100000 0x100000>;
> +		};
> +	};
> +
> +	otp-partitions {
> +		compatible = "fixed-partitions";
> +		#address-cells = <1>;
> +		#size-cells = <1>;
> +
> +		region@0 {
> +			label = "factory-data";
> +			reg = <0x0 0x40>;
> +
> +			#address-cells = <0x1>;
> +			#size-cells = <0x1>;
> +
> +			product: nvmem@0 {
> +				reg = <0x0 0x2>;
> +			};
> +
> +			revision: nvmem@3 {
> +				reg = <0x3 0x2>;
> +			};
> +		};
> +	};
> +}

I think the MTD partition -> nvmem connection could benefit to non-OTP
partitions too.

So, how about defining the nvmem regions under the partition nodes,
like that:

flash@0 {
	partitions {
		compatible = "fixed-partitions";
		#address-cells = <1>;
		#size-cells = <1>;

		partition@0 {
			label = "uboot-spl";
			reg = <0x0 0xe0000>;
		};

		/* ... */

		partition@X{
			label = "factory-data-part";
			reg = <0x200000 0x100000>;
			#address-cells = <1>;
			#size-cells = <1>;

			product: nvmem@0 {
				reg = <0x0 0x2>;
			};

			revision: nvmem@3 {
				reg = <0x3 0x2>;
			};
		};
	};

	otp-partitions {
		compatible = "fixed-partitions";
		#address-cells = <1>;
		#size-cells = <1>;

		partition@X{
			label = "factory-data-part";
			reg = <0x0 0x40>;
			#address-cells = <1>;
			#size-cells = <1>;

			product: nvmem@0 {
				reg = <0x0 0x2>;
			};

			revision: nvmem@3 {
				reg = <0x3 0x2>;
			};
		};
	};
};

I know this requires changing the implementation to select the
appropriate nvmem wrapper to use depending on whether we're interfacing
with an OTP area or a regular one, but that should be doable.

Regards,

Boris
Moritz Fischer May 26, 2016, 5:28 p.m. UTC | #2
Hi Boris,

On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 1:04 AM, Boris Brezillon
<boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> wrote:

> I think the MTD partition -> nvmem connection could benefit to non-OTP
> partitions too.

Yeah, I thought about that, too. Would you use the _read, and _write
callbacks in that case?

> So, how about defining the nvmem regions under the partition nodes,
> like that:
>
> flash@0 {
>         partitions {
>                 compatible = "fixed-partitions";
>                 #address-cells = <1>;
>                 #size-cells = <1>;
>
>                 partition@0 {
>                         label = "uboot-spl";
>                         reg = <0x0 0xe0000>;
>                 };
>
>                 /* ... */
>
>                 partition@X{
>                         label = "factory-data-part";
>                         reg = <0x200000 0x100000>;
>                         #address-cells = <1>;
>                         #size-cells = <1>;
>
>                         product: nvmem@0 {
>                                 reg = <0x0 0x2>;
>                         };
>
>                         revision: nvmem@3 {
>                                 reg = <0x3 0x2>;
>                         };
>                 };
>         };
>
>         otp-partitions {
>                 compatible = "fixed-partitions";
>                 #address-cells = <1>;
>                 #size-cells = <1>;
>
>                 partition@X{
>                         label = "factory-data-part";
>                         reg = <0x0 0x40>;
>                         #address-cells = <1>;
>                         #size-cells = <1>;
>
>                         product: nvmem@0 {
>                                 reg = <0x0 0x2>;
>                         };
>
>                         revision: nvmem@3 {
>                                 reg = <0x3 0x2>;
>                         };
>                 };
>         };
> };
>
> I know this requires changing the implementation to select the
> appropriate nvmem wrapper to use depending on whether we're interfacing
> with an OTP area or a regular one, but that should be doable.

The implementation still needs work anyways, so I might as well add
this to my list ...
Would you do the nvmem mapping always, or conditionalize on a flag in
the dt node like 'nvmem-export'?

Thanks for the feedback,

Moritz
Boris Brezillon May 27, 2016, 1:26 p.m. UTC | #3
Hi Moritz,

On Thu, 26 May 2016 10:28:48 -0700
Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@ettus.com> wrote:

> Hi Boris,
> 
> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 1:04 AM, Boris Brezillon
> <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> 
> > I think the MTD partition -> nvmem connection could benefit to non-OTP
> > partitions too.  
> 
> Yeah, I thought about that, too. Would you use the _read, and _write
> callbacks in that case?

Yep, this means you'll need a flag to decide what kind of partition is
exposed (OTP or normal), and then adjust the partition
->_read()/->_write() implementations.

Actually, I'm not sure what will happen if you really expose OTP
partitions, since these ones shouldn't implement norma
->_read()/_write(), or they should wrap those calls around their
master ->_read/write_prot_xx().
I must admit I haven't looked at patch 2 yet, so maybe that's what
you're doing.

> 
> > So, how about defining the nvmem regions under the partition nodes,
> > like that:
> >
> > flash@0 {
> >         partitions {
> >                 compatible = "fixed-partitions";
> >                 #address-cells = <1>;
> >                 #size-cells = <1>;
> >
> >                 partition@0 {
> >                         label = "uboot-spl";
> >                         reg = <0x0 0xe0000>;
> >                 };
> >
> >                 /* ... */
> >
> >                 partition@X{
> >                         label = "factory-data-part";
> >                         reg = <0x200000 0x100000>;
> >                         #address-cells = <1>;
> >                         #size-cells = <1>;
> >
> >                         product: nvmem@0 {
> >                                 reg = <0x0 0x2>;
> >                         };
> >
> >                         revision: nvmem@3 {
> >                                 reg = <0x3 0x2>;
> >                         };
> >                 };
> >         };
> >
> >         otp-partitions {
> >                 compatible = "fixed-partitions";
> >                 #address-cells = <1>;
> >                 #size-cells = <1>;
> >
> >                 partition@X{
> >                         label = "factory-data-part";
> >                         reg = <0x0 0x40>;
> >                         #address-cells = <1>;
> >                         #size-cells = <1>;
> >
> >                         product: nvmem@0 {
> >                                 reg = <0x0 0x2>;
> >                         };
> >
> >                         revision: nvmem@3 {
> >                                 reg = <0x3 0x2>;
> >                         };
> >                 };
> >         };
> > };
> >
> > I know this requires changing the implementation to select the
> > appropriate nvmem wrapper to use depending on whether we're interfacing
> > with an OTP area or a regular one, but that should be doable.  
> 
> The implementation still needs work anyways, so I might as well add
> this to my list ...
> Would you do the nvmem mapping always, or conditionalize on a flag in
> the dt node like 'nvmem-export'?

Well, I asked myself the same question when I proposed the binding. You
actually don't need the property since you can detect the presence of
the #address/size-cells properties or the presence of child nodes, but
maybe it's safer to make it dependent on an extra property (or use
compatible = "mtd-to-nvmem").
I honestly don't know what's the best solution. Rob, any suggestion?

Regards,

Boris
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/otp-nvmem.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/otp-nvmem.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a83a7da
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/otp-nvmem.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ 
+Representing OTP regions in devicetree
+
+OTP regions can be represented by sub-nodes of an mtd device.
+
+The partition table should be a subnode of the mtd node and should be names
+'otp-partitions'. This node should have the following property:
+
+- compatible: (required) must be 'fixed-partitions'
+
+OTP regions are then defined in subnodes of the partitions node.
+
+Required properties for OTP regions:
+- reg: The region's offset and size within the mtd device
+
+Optional properties:
+- label: The label / name for this region. If ommited, the label is taken
+  from the node name (excluding the unit address).
+
+Example:
+
+flash@0 {
+	partitions {
+		compatible = "fixed-partitions";
+		#address-cells = <1>;
+		#size-cells = <1>;
+
+		partition@0 {
+			label = "uboot-spl";
+			reg = <0x0 0xe0000>;
+		};
+		partition@1 {
+			label = "uboot-env";
+			reg = <0xe0000 0x20000>;
+		};
+		partition@2 {
+			label = "uboot";
+			reg = <0x100000 0x100000>;
+		};
+	};
+
+	otp-partitions {
+		compatible = "fixed-partitions";
+		#address-cells = <1>;
+		#size-cells = <1>;
+
+		region@0 {
+			label = "factory-data";
+			reg = <0x0 0x40>;
+
+			#address-cells = <0x1>;
+			#size-cells = <0x1>;
+
+			product: nvmem@0 {
+				reg = <0x0 0x2>;
+			};
+
+			revision: nvmem@3 {
+				reg = <0x3 0x2>;
+			};
+		};
+	};
+}