diff mbox

[1/2] ubifs: Kconfig: fix the description in Kconfig

Message ID 1435728600-14560-1-git-send-email-yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com
State Rejected
Headers show

Commit Message

Dongsheng Yang July 1, 2015, 5:29 a.m. UTC
If unsure we would say 'N' rather than 'Y'.

Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 fs/ubifs/Kconfig | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Brian Norris July 30, 2015, 4:47 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 01:29:59PM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
> If unsure we would say 'N' rather than 'Y'.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  fs/ubifs/Kconfig | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/Kconfig b/fs/ubifs/Kconfig
> index ba66d50..f9aaad1 100644
> --- a/fs/ubifs/Kconfig
> +++ b/fs/ubifs/Kconfig
> @@ -27,11 +27,11 @@ config UBIFS_FS_LZO
>  	default y
>  	help
>  	   LZO compressor is generally faster than zlib but compresses worse.
> -	   Say 'Y' if unsure.
> +	   Say 'N' if unsure.

Why would we recommend 'N' yet set the default to 'Y'? Seems like
some dissonance.

Also, I'm not an expert on UBIFS, but I imagine the suggestion to say
yes is because of legacy support; what if you need to mount a file
system that was created with LZO?

>  
>  config UBIFS_FS_ZLIB
>  	bool "ZLIB compression support" if UBIFS_FS_ADVANCED_COMPR
>  	depends on UBIFS_FS
>  	default y
>  	help
> -	  Zlib compresses better than LZO but it is slower. Say 'Y' if unsure.
> +	  Zlib compresses better than LZO but it is slower. Say 'N' if unsure.

Same here.

Brian
Dongsheng Yang July 31, 2015, 12:03 a.m. UTC | #2
On 07/31/2015 12:47 AM, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 01:29:59PM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
>> If unsure we would say 'N' rather than 'Y'.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>>   fs/ubifs/Kconfig | 4 ++--
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/Kconfig b/fs/ubifs/Kconfig
>> index ba66d50..f9aaad1 100644
>> --- a/fs/ubifs/Kconfig
>> +++ b/fs/ubifs/Kconfig
>> @@ -27,11 +27,11 @@ config UBIFS_FS_LZO
>>   	default y
>>   	help
>>   	   LZO compressor is generally faster than zlib but compresses worse.
>> -	   Say 'Y' if unsure.
>> +	   Say 'N' if unsure.
>
> Why would we recommend 'N' yet set the default to 'Y'? Seems like
> some dissonance.

OMG, that's TRUE. I can not recall what I was thinking when I sent
this patch, but I believe there was something wrong in my mind.

Thanx a lot to point it out, Brian.

Atem and Richard, Please ignore this noise. My bad :(.

Yang
>
> Also, I'm not an expert on UBIFS, but I imagine the suggestion to say
> yes is because of legacy support; what if you need to mount a file
> system that was created with LZO?
>
>>
>>   config UBIFS_FS_ZLIB
>>   	bool "ZLIB compression support" if UBIFS_FS_ADVANCED_COMPR
>>   	depends on UBIFS_FS
>>   	default y
>>   	help
>> -	  Zlib compresses better than LZO but it is slower. Say 'Y' if unsure.
>> +	  Zlib compresses better than LZO but it is slower. Say 'N' if unsure.
>
> Same here.
>
> Brian
> .
>
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/fs/ubifs/Kconfig b/fs/ubifs/Kconfig
index ba66d50..f9aaad1 100644
--- a/fs/ubifs/Kconfig
+++ b/fs/ubifs/Kconfig
@@ -27,11 +27,11 @@  config UBIFS_FS_LZO
 	default y
 	help
 	   LZO compressor is generally faster than zlib but compresses worse.
-	   Say 'Y' if unsure.
+	   Say 'N' if unsure.
 
 config UBIFS_FS_ZLIB
 	bool "ZLIB compression support" if UBIFS_FS_ADVANCED_COMPR
 	depends on UBIFS_FS
 	default y
 	help
-	  Zlib compresses better than LZO but it is slower. Say 'Y' if unsure.
+	  Zlib compresses better than LZO but it is slower. Say 'N' if unsure.