Message ID | CAKR0VNJdCEEoM8mqFrc-teQ-q=DopGisos16+uKt=ky2mRjF8g@mail.gmail.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On 18 March 2015 at 11:14, Vincent Yang <vincent.cw.yang@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Arnd and Olof, > > Please consider pulling in these patches for series of Fujitsu SoC > based around variations of 2xCA7+2xCA15 big.LITTLE architecture. > > The MHU driver is already queued in Mailbox tree. > > Thanks, > > The following changes since commit c517d838eb7d07bbe9507871fab3931deccff539: > > Linux 4.0-rc1 (2015-02-22 18:21:14 -0800) > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.linaro.org/landing-teams/working/fujitsu/integration.git > s7x-arch-pull > > for you to fetch changes up to 9cf417fee0bbea9296791fa9a15ab289307bb26a: > > ARM: MB86S7x: Add configs (2015-03-17 11:22:40 +0530) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Jassi Brar (6): > ARM: Add platform support for Fujitsu MB86S7X SoCs > ARM: MB86S7X: Add MCPM support > clk: Add clock driver for mb86s7x > dt: mb86s7x: add dt files for MB86S7x evbs > of: add Fujitsu vendor prefix > ARM: MB86S7x: Add configs > Hi Arnd, Hi Olof, A polite reminder on the pull request. Or do we miss doing something? Thanks. Jassi
Hi Vincent, On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 02:44:30PM +0900, Vincent Yang wrote: > Hi Arnd and Olof, > > Please consider pulling in these patches for series of Fujitsu SoC > based around variations of 2xCA7+2xCA15 big.LITTLE architecture. > > The MHU driver is already queued in Mailbox tree. > > Thanks, > > The following changes since commit c517d838eb7d07bbe9507871fab3931deccff539: > > Linux 4.0-rc1 (2015-02-22 18:21:14 -0800) > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.linaro.org/landing-teams/working/fujitsu/integration.git > s7x-arch-pull > > for you to fetch changes up to 9cf417fee0bbea9296791fa9a15ab289307bb26a: > > ARM: MB86S7x: Add configs (2015-03-17 11:22:40 +0530) Please use signed tags when you send pull requests (and ideally, please get your GPG key signed by people at the next Linaro Connect or other event where you will get in contact with other kernel developers). I started looking at this patch set, and it's adding global include file contents for things that should only exist under the drivers/soc/ directory, i.e. internal driver defines, etc -- it shouldn't be exposed to the kernel as a whole. I'll find the individual patches where they were posted and comment on those directly. As far as applying the code -- initial platforms like these usually go in through different branches so applying them directly makes sense for us. Once you're up and rolling as a maintainer you'll get a hang of what we want to see grouped in the different branches and pull requests will be easier to handle. Thanks, -Olof
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 08:32:01AM +0530, Jassi Brar wrote: > On 18 March 2015 at 11:14, Vincent Yang <vincent.cw.yang@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Arnd and Olof, > > > > Please consider pulling in these patches for series of Fujitsu SoC > > based around variations of 2xCA7+2xCA15 big.LITTLE architecture. > > > > The MHU driver is already queued in Mailbox tree. > > > > Thanks, > > > > The following changes since commit c517d838eb7d07bbe9507871fab3931deccff539: > > > > Linux 4.0-rc1 (2015-02-22 18:21:14 -0800) > > > > are available in the git repository at: > > > > git://git.linaro.org/landing-teams/working/fujitsu/integration.git > > s7x-arch-pull > > > > for you to fetch changes up to 9cf417fee0bbea9296791fa9a15ab289307bb26a: > > > > ARM: MB86S7x: Add configs (2015-03-17 11:22:40 +0530) > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Jassi Brar (6): > > ARM: Add platform support for Fujitsu MB86S7X SoCs > > ARM: MB86S7X: Add MCPM support > > clk: Add clock driver for mb86s7x > > dt: mb86s7x: add dt files for MB86S7x evbs > > of: add Fujitsu vendor prefix > > ARM: MB86S7x: Add configs > > > Hi Arnd, Hi Olof, > A polite reminder on the pull request. Or do we miss doing something? Hi, No, we've just been backlogged and slow to respond. -Olof
On 31/03/15 04:02, Jassi Brar wrote: > On 18 March 2015 at 11:14, Vincent Yang <vincent.cw.yang@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi Arnd and Olof, >> >> Please consider pulling in these patches for series of Fujitsu SoC >> based around variations of 2xCA7+2xCA15 big.LITTLE architecture. >> >> The MHU driver is already queued in Mailbox tree. >> I see this in next but would like to fix the binding before it gets merged in v4.1. I have provided feedback on that patch. Mainly the compatible, clocks and the interrupt names have to fixed in the binding. Code changes can be done later, but bindings no. I prefer an ACK from DT guys if possible. Regards, Sudeep
2015-04-02 8:50 GMT+08:00 Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>: > Hi Vincent, > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 02:44:30PM +0900, Vincent Yang wrote: >> Hi Arnd and Olof, >> >> Please consider pulling in these patches for series of Fujitsu SoC >> based around variations of 2xCA7+2xCA15 big.LITTLE architecture. >> >> The MHU driver is already queued in Mailbox tree. >> >> Thanks, >> >> The following changes since commit c517d838eb7d07bbe9507871fab3931deccff539: >> >> Linux 4.0-rc1 (2015-02-22 18:21:14 -0800) >> >> are available in the git repository at: >> >> git://git.linaro.org/landing-teams/working/fujitsu/integration.git >> s7x-arch-pull >> >> for you to fetch changes up to 9cf417fee0bbea9296791fa9a15ab289307bb26a: >> >> ARM: MB86S7x: Add configs (2015-03-17 11:22:40 +0530) > > Please use signed tags when you send pull requests (and ideally, please get > your GPG key signed by people at the next Linaro Connect or other event where > you will get in contact with other kernel developers). > > I started looking at this patch set, and it's adding global include file > contents for things that should only exist under the drivers/soc/ directory, > i.e. internal driver defines, etc -- it shouldn't be exposed to the kernel as > a whole. > > I'll find the individual patches where they were posted and comment on those > directly. > > As far as applying the code -- initial platforms like these usually go in > through different branches so applying them directly makes sense for us. Once > you're up and rolling as a maintainer you'll get a hang of what we want to see > grouped in the different branches and pull requests will be easier to handle. Thanks a lot for your review and guidance! We look forward to your comments. Kind regards Vincent > > > Thanks, > > -Olof
On Wednesday 18 March 2015 14:44:30 Vincent Yang wrote: > Hi Arnd and Olof, > > Please consider pulling in these patches for series of Fujitsu SoC > based around variations of 2xCA7+2xCA15 big.LITTLE architecture. > > The MHU driver is already queued in Mailbox tree. > > If you want to make sure it gets into 4.2, now would be a good time to send a new pull request based on 4.1-rc1. Arnd