Message ID | CAK=WgbZ2vfyiR0kXa4+-3y9etxQLBfD8b7QRR+r8VCpbOuBruA@mail.gmail.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On Wednesday 22 February 2012, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: > > Hi Arnd, > > Please pull: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ohad/remoteproc.git rpmsg-for-3.4 > > To get the very basic rpmsg+remoteproc core functionality for 3.4. > > This is basically the same stuff I sent for 3.3, with an additional > fix and cleanup which were reported by Grant (and of course the two > patches that fixed the 3.3 merge conflicts). > > This entire patch set has been sitting in linux-next for quite some > time. I'm not sure if it'd conflict with your tree when you pull it, > but I can of course ask Stephen to remove my tree if things look ok to > you. Hi Ohad, I've looked at the code again now and pulled it into the arm-soc tree as the next/rpmsg branch, queued for submission to Linus in the 3.4 merge window. There won't be any conflicts in linux-next because the commits are identical, so it doesn't matter whether you leave your branch in linux-next or now. If you have updates on top of this branch, I can apply them directly here. Let's see how things go after v3.4-rc1 before we decide whether you want to keep sending patches to arm-soc for v3.5 as well or whether you just use your own branch then. Arnd
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: > I've looked at the code again now and pulled it into the arm-soc > tree as the next/rpmsg branch, queued for submission to Linus in > the 3.4 merge window. There won't be any conflicts in linux-next > because the commits are identical, so it doesn't matter whether > you leave your branch in linux-next or now. If you have updates > on top of this branch, I can apply them directly here. > > Let's see how things go after v3.4-rc1 before we decide whether > you want to keep sending patches to arm-soc for v3.5 as well or > whether you just use your own branch then. Thanks! Ohad.