diff mbox

[v4,20/28] ARM: owl: Implement CPU enable-method for S500

Message ID CAK8P3a2epor2RZzJ1ySp2g-vUSTj+miWNJC26uYU7v3Knq=pvw@mail.gmail.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Arnd Bergmann June 21, 2017, 10:25 a.m. UTC
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 2:54 AM, Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote:
>> Allow to bring up CPU1.
>>
>> Based on LeMaker linux-actions tree.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
>> ---
>>  v3 -> v4: Unchanged
>>
>>  v3: new
>>
>>  arch/arm/mach-actions/Makefile  |   3 +
>>  arch/arm/mach-actions/headsmp.S |  68 ++++++++++++++++
>>  arch/arm/mach-actions/platsmp.c | 166 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> I now see build errors in linux-next:
>
> /git/arm-soc/arch/arm/mach-actions/platsmp.c: In function 'write_pen_release':
> /git/arm-soc/arch/arm/mach-actions/platsmp.c:39:2: error:
> 'pen_release' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean

I have a fix and tested it now. Please fold this into your patch:

       Arnd

Subject: [PATCH] ARM: owl: fix non-SMP build

arch/arm/mach-actions/platsmp.c: In function 'write_pen_release':
arch/arm/mach-actions/platsmp.c:39:2: error: 'pen_release' undeclared
(first use in this function); did you mean 'seq_release'?

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Comments

Andreas Färber June 21, 2017, 4:48 p.m. UTC | #1
Am 21.06.2017 um 12:25 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 2:54 AM, Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote:
>>> Allow to bring up CPU1.
>>>
>>> Based on LeMaker linux-actions tree.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
>>> ---
>>>  v3 -> v4: Unchanged
>>>
>>>  v3: new
>>>
>>>  arch/arm/mach-actions/Makefile  |   3 +
>>>  arch/arm/mach-actions/headsmp.S |  68 ++++++++++++++++
>>>  arch/arm/mach-actions/platsmp.c | 166 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>
>> I now see build errors in linux-next:
>>
>> /git/arm-soc/arch/arm/mach-actions/platsmp.c: In function 'write_pen_release':
>> /git/arm-soc/arch/arm/mach-actions/platsmp.c:39:2: error:
>> 'pen_release' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean
> 
> I have a fix and tested it now. Please fold this into your patch:
> 
>        Arnd
> 
> Subject: [PATCH] ARM: owl: fix non-SMP build
> 
> arch/arm/mach-actions/platsmp.c: In function 'write_pen_release':
> arch/arm/mach-actions/platsmp.c:39:2: error: 'pen_release' undeclared
> (first use in this function); did you mean 'seq_release'?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-actions/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-actions/Makefile
> index 217e95d04b43..94f8dbafba21 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-actions/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-actions/Makefile
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ACTIONS) += owl.o
> -obj-${CONFIG_ARCH_ACTIONS} += platsmp.o headsmp.o
> +obj-y += owl.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += platsmp.o headsmp.o

Sorry. Fixed up the two patches, thanks!

Interestingly the below issue had been found by automatic patch testing,
but the above wasn't. Maybe you can contribute your non-SMP config for
the bots, to help catch this earlier?

> 
>  AFLAGS_headsmp.o := -Wa,-march=armv7-a
> 

Cheers,
Andreas
Arnd Bergmann June 21, 2017, 6:02 p.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 6:48 PM, Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote:
> Am 21.06.2017 um 12:25 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
>> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 2:54 AM, Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote:
>>>> Allow to bring up CPU1.
>>>>
>>>> Based on LeMaker linux-actions tree.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
>>>> ---
>>>>  v3 -> v4: Unchanged
>>>>
>>>>  v3: new
>>>>
>>>>  arch/arm/mach-actions/Makefile  |   3 +
>>>>  arch/arm/mach-actions/headsmp.S |  68 ++++++++++++++++
>>>>  arch/arm/mach-actions/platsmp.c | 166 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>
>>> I now see build errors in linux-next:
>>>
>>> /git/arm-soc/arch/arm/mach-actions/platsmp.c: In function 'write_pen_release':
>>> /git/arm-soc/arch/arm/mach-actions/platsmp.c:39:2: error:
>>> 'pen_release' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean
>>
>> I have a fix and tested it now. Please fold this into your patch:
>>
>>        Arnd
>>
>> Subject: [PATCH] ARM: owl: fix non-SMP build
>>
>> arch/arm/mach-actions/platsmp.c: In function 'write_pen_release':
>> arch/arm/mach-actions/platsmp.c:39:2: error: 'pen_release' undeclared
>> (first use in this function); did you mean 'seq_release'?
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-actions/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-actions/Makefile
>> index 217e95d04b43..94f8dbafba21 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-actions/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-actions/Makefile
>> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>> -obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ACTIONS) += owl.o
>> -obj-${CONFIG_ARCH_ACTIONS} += platsmp.o headsmp.o
>> +obj-y += owl.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += platsmp.o headsmp.o
>
> Sorry. Fixed up the two patches, thanks!
>
> Interestingly the below issue had been found by automatic patch testing,
> but the above wasn't. Maybe you can contribute your non-SMP config for
> the bots, to help catch this earlier?

This was just a randconfig build. On ARM32, we do test
"multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_SMP=n"
in kernelci, but that only tests mach-actions after that gets added to
multi_v7_defconfig. Not sure if it's worth adding an allmodconfig+CONFIG_SMP=n"
build, the allmodconfig builds are rather expensive.

        Arnd
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-actions/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-actions/Makefile
index 217e95d04b43..94f8dbafba21 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-actions/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-actions/Makefile
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ 
-obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ACTIONS) += owl.o
-obj-${CONFIG_ARCH_ACTIONS} += platsmp.o headsmp.o
+obj-y += owl.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += platsmp.o headsmp.o

 AFLAGS_headsmp.o := -Wa,-march=armv7-a