| Message ID | CAAQ0ZWSZJthOvw0EY3Of-Sn=n85H5VJSaFEZjgqGeUduKkLeZw@mail.gmail.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> wrote: > On 6 December 2011 16:40, Eric Miao <eric.miao@linaro.org> wrote: >> Hi Sascha, >> >> Just FYI, >> >> CC arch/arm/plat-mxc/gic.o >> /home/ycmiao/linux-2.6/arch/arm/plat-mxc/gic.c: In function 'gic_handle_irq': >> /home/ycmiao/linux-2.6/arch/arm/plat-mxc/gic.c:44:4: error: implicit >> declaration of function 'handle_local_timer' >> make[2]: *** [arch/arm/plat-mxc/gic.o] Error 1 >> make[1]: *** [arch/arm/plat-mxc] Error 2 >> make: *** [sub-make] Error 2 >> >> Do we have a fix somewhere already? >> > This should be fixed by Marc's series below, which has hit the mainline. > Awesome. I'll do a quick merge and test if that's working. Marc, What's the status of the branch? > Regards, > Shawn > > ----- > Russell, > > I've collected patches converting GIC and VIC based platforms to use the > MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER configuration option in a single branch (as they depend > on a common patch). > > It also include the patch adding non-banked support to the GIC, which is > required to convert EXYNOS to MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER in a sane way (not to > mention fixing obvious bugs). > > If you're happy with this, feel free to pull this branch. > > Thanks, > > M. > > The following changes since commit cfcfc9eca2bcbd26a8e206baeb005b055dbf8e37: > Linus Torvalds (1): > Linux 3.2-rc2 > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maz/arm-platforms.git > irqchip-consolidation > > Jamie Iles (12): > ARM: vic: device tree binding > ARM: vic: MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER handler > ARM: ep93xx: convert to MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER > ARM: netx: convert to MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER > ARM: nomadik: convert to MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER > ARM: s3c64xx: convert to MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER > ARM: spear: convert to MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER > ARM: u300: convert to MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER > ARM: versatile: convert to MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER > ARM: samsung: convert to MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER > ARM: picoxcell: convert to MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER > ARM: VIC: remove non MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER support > > Marc Zyngier (19): > ARM: gic: allow GIC to support non-banked setups > ARM: Make global handler and CONFIG_MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER mutually exclusive > ARM: mxc: rename gic_handle_irq to avoid name clash > ARM: GIC: Add global gic_handle_irq() function > ARM: imx: convert smp platforms to global gic_handle_irq() > ARM: highbank: convert to CONFIG_MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER > ARM: RealView: convert to CONFIG_MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER > ARM: VExpress: convert to CONFIG_MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER > ARM: msm: convert SMP platforms to CONFIG_MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER > ARM: exynos4: convert to CONFIG_MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER > ARM: tegra2: convert to CONFIG_MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER > ARM: ux500: convert to CONFIG_MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER > ARM: shmobile: convert smp platforms to gic_handle_irq() > ARM: cns3xxx: convert to CONFIG_MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER > ARM: zynq: convert to CONFIG_MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER > ARM: omap2/3: Add global omap2/3_intc_handle_irq() functions > ARM: omap2plus: convert to CONFIG_MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER > ARM: omap2plus: remove irq-related global base addresses > ARM: GIC: Make MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER mandatory > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
On 6 December 2011 17:11, Eric Miao <eric.miao@linaro.org> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> wrote: >> On 6 December 2011 16:40, Eric Miao <eric.miao@linaro.org> wrote: >>> Hi Sascha, >>> >>> Just FYI, >>> >>> CC arch/arm/plat-mxc/gic.o >>> /home/ycmiao/linux-2.6/arch/arm/plat-mxc/gic.c: In function 'gic_handle_irq': >>> /home/ycmiao/linux-2.6/arch/arm/plat-mxc/gic.c:44:4: error: implicit >>> declaration of function 'handle_local_timer' >>> make[2]: *** [arch/arm/plat-mxc/gic.o] Error 1 >>> make[1]: *** [arch/arm/plat-mxc] Error 2 >>> make: *** [sub-make] Error 2 >>> >>> Do we have a fix somewhere already? >>> >> This should be fixed by Marc's series below, which has hit the mainline. >> > > Awesome. I'll do a quick merge and test if that's working. > > Marc, > > What's the status of the branch? > Sorry, I was mistaken here. Please ignore it, and let me find the correct patch.