mbox

[GIT,PULL] arm: pxa: pxa for v3.19

Message ID 87bnoevq1b.fsf@free.fr
State New
Headers show

Pull-request

https://github.com/rjarzmik/linux.git tags/pxa-for-3.19

Message

Robert Jarzmik Nov. 10, 2014, 7:01 p.m. UTC
The following changes since commit 206c5f60a3d902bc4b56dab2de3e88de5eb06108:

  Linux 3.18-rc4 (2014-11-09 14:55:29 -0800)

are available in the git repository at:

  https://github.com/rjarzmik/linux.git tags/pxa-for-3.19

for you to fetch changes up to af1e3ad7be02013b7481b0997919d16b871bc907:

  arm: pxa: add pxa27x device-tree support (2014-11-10 00:31:26 +0100)

----------------------------------------------------------------
arm: pxa: pxa for v3.19

Hello Arnd, Kevin, Olof,

This is a very quiet release, featuring a small cleanup, a tosa change
on its charger driver, and support for pxa device-tree based pxa27x
boards.

The device-tree part will only be fully activated once clocks support
is fully operational in the common clock framework.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov (1):
      ARM: pxa: tosa: switch to gpio-charger

Joe Perches (1):
      arm: mach-pxa: Convert pr_warning to pr_warn

Robert Jarzmik (4):
      arm: pxa: add device-tree irq init for pxa27x
      arm: pxa: move init functions into generic.h
      arm: pxa: remove unnecessary includes from pxa-dt
      arm: pxa: add pxa27x device-tree support

 arch/arm/mach-pxa/Kconfig               | 11 ++++++
 arch/arm/mach-pxa/Makefile              |  1 +
 arch/arm/mach-pxa/em-x270.c             |  4 +-
 arch/arm/mach-pxa/generic.h             | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
 arch/arm/mach-pxa/gumstix.c             |  3 +-
 arch/arm/mach-pxa/include/mach/pxa25x.h |  8 ----
 arch/arm/mach-pxa/include/mach/pxa27x.h |  4 --
 arch/arm/mach-pxa/include/mach/pxa3xx.h |  5 ---
 arch/arm/mach-pxa/mfp-pxa2xx.c          | 12 +++---
 arch/arm/mach-pxa/poodle.c              |  2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-pxa/pxa-dt.c              | 18 +++++++--
 arch/arm/mach-pxa/pxa27x.c              |  6 +++
 arch/arm/mach-pxa/pxa3xx-ulpi.c         |  6 +--
 arch/arm/mach-pxa/raumfeld.c            | 26 ++++++-------
 arch/arm/mach-pxa/tosa.c                | 41 ++++-----------------
 15 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 105 deletions(-)

Comments

Arnd Bergmann Nov. 19, 2014, 10:33 p.m. UTC | #1
On Monday 10 November 2014, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Hello Arnd, Kevin, Olof,
> 
> This is a very quiet release, featuring a small cleanup, a tosa change
> on its charger driver, and support for pxa device-tree based pxa27x
> boards.
> 
> The device-tree part will only be fully activated once clocks support
> is fully operational in the common clock framework.

Hi Robert,

Sorry for the delay in replying. I noticed that you have based your
patches on top of v3.18-rc4. If you don't have a strong reason for
doing so, could you send everything based on an -rc1 in the future?

If you don't mind, please rebase and send again.

	Arnd
Robert Jarzmik Nov. 19, 2014, 10:39 p.m. UTC | #2
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> writes:

> Hi Robert,
>
> Sorry for the delay in replying. I noticed that you have based your
> patches on top of v3.18-rc4. If you don't have a strong reason for
> doing so, could you send everything based on an -rc1 in the future?

Ah no, no strong reason. I was waiting for v3.18-rc4 to have all the pxa fixes
merged before doing my pull request. But there is no dependency between the
fixes and this pull request, so the rebase will come for free.

> If you don't mind, please rebase and send again.
Of course, I will, this week-end.

Cheers.
Arnd Bergmann Nov. 19, 2014, 10:42 p.m. UTC | #3
On Wednesday 19 November 2014 23:39:57 Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> writes:
> 
> > Hi Robert,
> >
> > Sorry for the delay in replying. I noticed that you have based your
> > patches on top of v3.18-rc4. If you don't have a strong reason for
> > doing so, could you send everything based on an -rc1 in the future?
> 
> Ah no, no strong reason. I was waiting for v3.18-rc4 to have all the pxa fixes
> merged before doing my pull request. But there is no dependency between the
> fixes and this pull request, so the rebase will come for free.

FWIW, if a case like this comes up again, just base the changes for
the next kernel on top of the bug fixes you are sending for the same
platform.

> > If you don't mind, please rebase and send again.
> Of course, I will, this week-end.

We are running a bit short on time though, and I'd like to have it
merged earlier. If nobody else is using your branch, I can just do
the rebase myself, since there are only a few patches in it.

	Arnd