Message ID | 20120416080053.GQ3852@pengutronix.de |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Hi Olof, On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:00:53AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > Ok, won't do this in future. I just thought it might be a good idea, > because otherwise I end up with the same tag names in the next pull > request. > > > > > Branch contents otherwise looks OK, so respin and send a fresh pull > > request and we'll merge it in. > > Here it is: Still something wrong? Sascha > > The following changes since commit dd775ae2549217d3ae09363e3edb305d0fa19928: > > Linux 3.4-rc1 (2012-03-31 16:24:09 -0700) > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.pengutronix.de/git/imx/linux-2.6.git tags/arm-imx-cleanup > > for you to fetch changes up to 33076883bc45bfdd5fa5c9bff7f012a460719aba: > > ARM: i.MX: efikamx: match machine descriptions with legacy (2012-04-16 09:54:50 +0200) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > ARM: i.MX: misc board cleanups > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Hector Oron (1): > ARM: i.MX: efikamx: match machine descriptions with legacy > > Uwe Kleine-König (1): > ARM: imx/mx21ads: remove unneeded cast > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-mx21ads.c | 3 +-- > arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-mx51_efikamx.c | 3 +-- > arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-mx51_efikasb.c | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > -- > Pengutronix e.K. | | > Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | > Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | > Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel >
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> wrote: > Hi Olof, > > On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:00:53AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: >> >> Ok, won't do this in future. I just thought it might be a good idea, >> because otherwise I end up with the same tag names in the next pull >> request. >> >> > >> > Branch contents otherwise looks OK, so respin and send a fresh pull >> > request and we'll merge it in. >> >> Here it is: > > Still something wrong? Nope, just forgot to revisit. Pulled now. Sorry for the delay. Regards, -Olof