Message ID | 20120204003203.GB28377@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Hi, On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:40:53PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: >> Hi Arnd, Olof, >> >> Please pull the following mxs board changes for v3.4. It has no >> conflict with rmk/for-armsoc branch. >> > Since you have not pulled it yet, I'm updating it as v2 with Lauri's > APX4 patch added. Please pull. Hmm, we're normally not that keen on picking up new board files. Since MX28 isn't converted over to device tree (yet) though, not much to do about. I've pulled this branch for 3.4. If there are more MX2* boards coming in over time, we will want to see them converted over to at least device-tree board probing (i.e. using just the basic compatible for board and bootargs/mem from a device tree instead of the allocated machine type and ATAGs). -Olof
On 8 February 2012 17:17, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:40:53PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: >>> Hi Arnd, Olof, >>> >>> Please pull the following mxs board changes for v3.4. It has no >>> conflict with rmk/for-armsoc branch. >>> >> Since you have not pulled it yet, I'm updating it as v2 with Lauri's >> APX4 patch added. Please pull. > > Hmm, we're normally not that keen on picking up new board files. Since > MX28 isn't converted over to device tree (yet) though, not much to do > about. I've pulled this branch for 3.4. > Thanks. > If there are more MX2* boards coming in over time, we will want to see > them converted over to at least device-tree board probing (i.e. using > just the basic compatible for board and bootargs/mem from a device > tree instead of the allocated machine type and ATAGs). > Hopefully, this is the last one. I will try to start converting mach-mxs to device tree soon. Regards, Shawn