| Message ID | 1473327022-8065-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 11:30:21AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > This fixes > [ 0.000000] i.MX clk 82: register failed with -17 > because the name is duplicated. > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> I did not queue any clock patches for this cycle. Can you please send the patches directly to clock maintainers? Shawn > --- > drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx35.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx35.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx35.c > index b0978d3b83e2..d302ed3b8225 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx35.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx35.c > @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ static void __init _mx35_clocks_init(void) > } > > clk[ckih] = imx_clk_fixed("ckih", 24000000); > - clk[ckil] = imx_clk_fixed("ckih", 32768); > + clk[ckil] = imx_clk_fixed("ckil", 32768); > clk[mpll] = imx_clk_pllv1(IMX_PLLV1_IMX35, "mpll", "ckih", base + MX35_CCM_MPCTL); > clk[ppll] = imx_clk_pllv1(IMX_PLLV1_IMX35, "ppll", "ckih", base + MX35_CCM_PPCTL); > > -- > 2.8.1 > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
To += mturquette, sboyd Hello Shawn, hello Michael, hello Stephen, On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 02:16:31PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 11:30:21AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > This fixes > > [ 0.000000] i.MX clk 82: register failed with -17 > > because the name is duplicated. > > > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> > > I did not queue any clock patches for this cycle. Can you please send > the patches directly to clock maintainers? @shawnguo: Is this an ack? @mturquette, sboyd: should I resend? IMHO the first patch should go in soon. Best regards Uwe
On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 08:20:34AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > To += mturquette, sboyd > > Hello Shawn, hello Michael, hello Stephen, > > On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 02:16:31PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 11:30:21AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > > This fixes > > > [ 0.000000] i.MX clk 82: register failed with -17 > > > because the name is duplicated. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> > > > > I did not queue any clock patches for this cycle. Can you please send > > the patches directly to clock maintainers? > > @shawnguo: Is this an ack? Yes, Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> > @mturquette, sboyd: should I resend? IMHO the first patch should go in > soon. > > Best regards > Uwe > > -- > Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | > Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
On 09/09, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > To += mturquette, sboyd > > Hello Shawn, hello Michael, hello Stephen, > > On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 02:16:31PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 11:30:21AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > > This fixes > > > [ 0.000000] i.MX clk 82: register failed with -17 > > > because the name is duplicated. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> > > > > I did not queue any clock patches for this cycle. Can you please send > > the patches directly to clock maintainers? > > @shawnguo: Is this an ack? > @mturquette, sboyd: should I resend? IMHO the first patch should go in > soon. Does the first patch need a fixes tag? We can apply them directly.
On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 11:11:38AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 09/09, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > To += mturquette, sboyd > > > > Hello Shawn, hello Michael, hello Stephen, > > > > On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 02:16:31PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 11:30:21AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > > > This fixes > > > > [ 0.000000] i.MX clk 82: register failed with -17 > > > > because the name is duplicated. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> > > > > > > I did not queue any clock patches for this cycle. Can you please send > > > the patches directly to clock maintainers? > > > > @shawnguo: Is this an ack? > > @mturquette, sboyd: should I resend? IMHO the first patch should go in > > soon. > > Does the first patch need a fixes tag? We can apply them > directly. The breakage was introduced by v4.3-rc2~4^2~71^2, i.e. 3713e3f5e927 (clk: imx35: define two clocks for rtc). Best regards Uwe
On 09/08, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > This fixes > [ 0.000000] i.MX clk 82: register failed with -17 > because the name is duplicated. > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> > --- Applied to clk-next
diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx35.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx35.c index b0978d3b83e2..d302ed3b8225 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx35.c +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx35.c @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ static void __init _mx35_clocks_init(void) } clk[ckih] = imx_clk_fixed("ckih", 24000000); - clk[ckil] = imx_clk_fixed("ckih", 32768); + clk[ckil] = imx_clk_fixed("ckil", 32768); clk[mpll] = imx_clk_pllv1(IMX_PLLV1_IMX35, "mpll", "ckih", base + MX35_CCM_MPCTL); clk[ppll] = imx_clk_pllv1(IMX_PLLV1_IMX35, "ppll", "ckih", base + MX35_CCM_PPCTL);
This fixes [ 0.000000] i.MX clk 82: register failed with -17 because the name is duplicated. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> --- drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx35.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)