diff mbox series

ata: libata-core: fix NULL pointer deref in ata_host_alloc_pinfo()

Message ID 3727e0b4-3958-283f-c0cf-6b8b898ab018@omp.ru
State New
Headers show
Series ata: libata-core: fix NULL pointer deref in ata_host_alloc_pinfo() | expand

Commit Message

Sergey Shtylyov May 20, 2022, 8:53 p.m. UTC
In an unlikely (and probably wrong?) case that the 'ppi' parameter of
ata_host_alloc_pinfo() points to an array starting with a NULL pointer,
there's going to be a kernel oops as the 'pi' local variable won't get
reassigned from the initial value of NULL.  Assign &ata_dummy_port_info
to 'pi' at the start of the *for* loop instead to fix this kernel oops
for good...

Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with the SVACE static
analysis tool.

Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru>

---
This patch is against the 'for-next' branch of Damien's 'libata.git' repo.

 drivers/ata/libata-core.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Damien Le Moal May 20, 2022, 11:45 p.m. UTC | #1
On 5/21/22 05:53, Sergey Shtylyov wrote:
> In an unlikely (and probably wrong?) case that the 'ppi' parameter of
> ata_host_alloc_pinfo() points to an array starting with a NULL pointer,
> there's going to be a kernel oops as the 'pi' local variable won't get
> reassigned from the initial value of NULL.  Assign &ata_dummy_port_info
> to 'pi' at the start of the *for* loop instead to fix this kernel oops
> for good...
> 
> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with the SVACE static
> analysis tool.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru>
> 
> ---
> This patch is against the 'for-next' branch of Damien's 'libata.git' repo.
> 
>  drivers/ata/libata-core.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Index: libata/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
> ===================================================================
> --- libata.orig/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
> +++ libata/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
> @@ -5470,7 +5470,7 @@ struct ata_host *ata_host_alloc_pinfo(st
>  	if (!host)
>  		return NULL;
>  
> -	for (i = 0, j = 0, pi = NULL; i < host->n_ports; i++) {
> +	for (i = 0, j = 0, pi = &ata_dummy_port_info; i < host->n_ports; i++) {
>  		struct ata_port *ap = host->ports[i];
>  
>  		if (ppi[j])

I had a fight with this one a while back as the build bot was complaining
about this a while back. pi cannot be null in this case, but silencing
warnings is good. So OK.

Just one nit: please move the initialization of pi to its declaration to
avoid the overly long for line.
Sergey Shtylyov May 21, 2022, 8 p.m. UTC | #2
Hello!

On 5/21/22 2:45 AM, Damien Le Moal wrote:

>> In an unlikely (and probably wrong?) case that the 'ppi' parameter of
>> ata_host_alloc_pinfo() points to an array starting with a NULL pointer,
>> there's going to be a kernel oops as the 'pi' local variable won't get
>> reassigned from the initial value of NULL.  Assign &ata_dummy_port_info
>> to 'pi' at the start of the *for* loop instead to fix this kernel oops
>> for good...
>>
>> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with the SVACE static
>> analysis tool.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru>
>>
>> ---
>> This patch is against the 'for-next' branch of Damien's 'libata.git' repo.
>>
>>  drivers/ata/libata-core.c |    2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> Index: libata/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- libata.orig/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
>> +++ libata/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
>> @@ -5470,7 +5470,7 @@ struct ata_host *ata_host_alloc_pinfo(st
>>  	if (!host)
>>  		return NULL;
>>  
>> -	for (i = 0, j = 0, pi = NULL; i < host->n_ports; i++) {
>> +	for (i = 0, j = 0, pi = &ata_dummy_port_info; i < host->n_ports; i++) {
>>  		struct ata_port *ap = host->ports[i];
>>  
>>  		if (ppi[j])
> 
> I had a fight with this one a while back as the build bot was complaining
> about this a while back.

   Hm, what exact tool was complaining?

> pi cannot be null in this case, but silencing
> warnings is good. So OK.

   At least it shouldn't be NULL with a tested driver... I found one driver (pata_cs5520)
that sets the port info array entries to &ata_dummy_port_info on disabled ports, hence
was my idea to also use it...

> Just one nit: please move the initialization of pi to its declaration to
> avoid the overly long for line.

   It's not _overly_ long but OK. :-)

MBR, Sergey
Damien Le Moal May 22, 2022, 8:46 a.m. UTC | #3
On 5/22/22 05:00, Sergey Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> On 5/21/22 2:45 AM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> 
>>> In an unlikely (and probably wrong?) case that the 'ppi' parameter of
>>> ata_host_alloc_pinfo() points to an array starting with a NULL pointer,
>>> there's going to be a kernel oops as the 'pi' local variable won't get
>>> reassigned from the initial value of NULL.  Assign &ata_dummy_port_info
>>> to 'pi' at the start of the *for* loop instead to fix this kernel oops
>>> for good...
>>>
>>> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with the SVACE static
>>> analysis tool.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> This patch is against the 'for-next' branch of Damien's 'libata.git' repo.
>>>
>>>  drivers/ata/libata-core.c |    2 +-
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> Index: libata/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- libata.orig/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
>>> +++ libata/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
>>> @@ -5470,7 +5470,7 @@ struct ata_host *ata_host_alloc_pinfo(st
>>>  	if (!host)
>>>  		return NULL;
>>>  
>>> -	for (i = 0, j = 0, pi = NULL; i < host->n_ports; i++) {
>>> +	for (i = 0, j = 0, pi = &ata_dummy_port_info; i < host->n_ports; i++) {
>>>  		struct ata_port *ap = host->ports[i];
>>>  
>>>  		if (ppi[j])
>>
>> I had a fight with this one a while back as the build bot was complaining
>> about this a while back.
> 
>    Hm, what exact tool was complaining?

It was the kernel 0-day build bot for non-x86 arch, can't remember which one.

> 
>> pi cannot be null in this case, but silencing
>> warnings is good. So OK.
> 
>    At least it shouldn't be NULL with a tested driver... I found one driver (pata_cs5520)
> that sets the port info array entries to &ata_dummy_port_info on disabled ports, hence
> was my idea to also use it...
> 
>> Just one nit: please move the initialization of pi to its declaration to
>> avoid the overly long for line.
> 
>    It's not _overly_ long but OK. :-)
> 
> MBR, Sergey
diff mbox series

Patch

Index: libata/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
===================================================================
--- libata.orig/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
+++ libata/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
@@ -5470,7 +5470,7 @@  struct ata_host *ata_host_alloc_pinfo(st
 	if (!host)
 		return NULL;
 
-	for (i = 0, j = 0, pi = NULL; i < host->n_ports; i++) {
+	for (i = 0, j = 0, pi = &ata_dummy_port_info; i < host->n_ports; i++) {
 		struct ata_port *ap = host->ports[i];
 
 		if (ppi[j])