[v2] ata: atp867x: Cleanup pointer value print

Pointers should be printed with %p or %px rather than cast to
'unsigned long' and printed with %lx
Change %lx to %p to print the secured pointer.

Signed-off-by: Guo Zhi <qtxuning1999@sjtu.edu.cn>
---
 drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

On 9/30/21 12:05, Guo Zhi wrote:
> Pointers should be printed with %p or %px rather than cast to
> 'unsigned long' and printed with %lx
> Change %lx to %p to print the secured pointer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Guo Zhi <qtxuning1999@sjtu.edu.cn>
> ---
>  drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c | 10 +++++-----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c b/drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c
> index 2bc5fc81efe3..c32b95f48e50 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c
> @@ -447,11 +447,11 @@ static int atp867x_ata_pci_sff_init_host(struct ata_host *host)
>  #ifdef	ATP867X_DEBUG
>  		atp867x_check_ports(ap, i);
>  #endif
> -		ata_port_desc(ap, "cmd 0x%lx ctl 0x%lx",
> -			(unsigned long)ioaddr->cmd_addr,
> -			(unsigned long)ioaddr->ctl_addr);
> -		ata_port_desc(ap, "bmdma 0x%lx",
> -			(unsigned long)ioaddr->bmdma_addr);
> +		ata_port_desc(ap, "cmd 0x%p ctl 0x%p",
> +			ioaddr->cmd_addr,
> +			ioaddr->ctl_addr);
> +		ata_port_desc(ap, "bmdma 0x%p",
> +			ioaddr->bmdma_addr);
>  
>  		mask |= 1 << i;
>  	}
> 

I lost track of this one. Any v3 to be expected to address Sergey comment ?

On 12.10.2021 4:06, Damien Le Moal wrote:

>> Pointers should be printed with %p or %px rather than cast to
>> 'unsigned long' and printed with %lx
>> Change %lx to %p to print the secured pointer.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Guo Zhi <qtxuning1999@sjtu.edu.cn>
>> ---
>>   drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c | 10 +++++-----
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c b/drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c
>> index 2bc5fc81efe3..c32b95f48e50 100644
>> --- a/drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c
>> +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c
>> @@ -447,11 +447,11 @@ static int atp867x_ata_pci_sff_init_host(struct ata_host *host)
>>   #ifdef	ATP867X_DEBUG
>>   		atp867x_check_ports(ap, i);
>>   #endif
>> -		ata_port_desc(ap, "cmd 0x%lx ctl 0x%lx",
>> -			(unsigned long)ioaddr->cmd_addr,
>> -			(unsigned long)ioaddr->ctl_addr);
>> -		ata_port_desc(ap, "bmdma 0x%lx",
>> -			(unsigned long)ioaddr->bmdma_addr);
>> +		ata_port_desc(ap, "cmd 0x%p ctl 0x%p",
>> +			ioaddr->cmd_addr,
>> +			ioaddr->ctl_addr);
>> +		ata_port_desc(ap, "bmdma 0x%p",
>> +			ioaddr->bmdma_addr);
>>   
>>   		mask |= 1 << i;
>>   	}
>>
> 
> I lost track of this one. Any v3 to be expected to address Sergey comment ?

    No, this patch isn't needed at all.

MBR, Sergey