From patchwork Tue Jan 31 08:39:44 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Byungchul Park X-Patchwork-Id: 1734629 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; helo=out1.vger.email; envelope-from=linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org; receiver=) Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4P5dpj2tbJz23gV for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 19:42:37 +1100 (AEDT) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231718AbjAaImf (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jan 2023 03:42:35 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54820 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231724AbjAaIkw (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jan 2023 03:40:52 -0500 Received: from lgeamrelo11.lge.com (lgeamrelo13.lge.com [156.147.23.53]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D34CE46D77 for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 00:40:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from unknown (HELO lgeamrelo04.lge.com) (156.147.1.127) by 156.147.23.53 with ESMTP; 31 Jan 2023 17:40:00 +0900 X-Original-SENDERIP: 156.147.1.127 X-Original-MAILFROM: max.byungchul.park@gmail.com Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) (10.177.244.38) by 156.147.1.127 with ESMTP; 31 Jan 2023 17:40:00 +0900 X-Original-SENDERIP: 10.177.244.38 X-Original-MAILFROM: max.byungchul.park@gmail.com From: Byungchul Park To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, will@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, joel@joelfernandes.org, sashal@kernel.org, daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch, duyuyang@gmail.com, johannes.berg@intel.com, tj@kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, willy@infradead.org, david@fromorbit.com, amir73il@gmail.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, kernel-team@lge.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@kernel.org, minchan@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, vdavydov.dev@gmail.com, sj@kernel.org, jglisse@redhat.com, dennis@kernel.org, cl@linux.com, penberg@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com, vbabka@suse.cz, ngupta@vflare.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, paolo.valente@linaro.org, josef@toxicpanda.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jack@suse.cz, jlayton@kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, hch@infradead.org, djwong@kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, rodrigosiqueiramelo@gmail.com, melissa.srw@gmail.com, hamohammed.sa@gmail.com, 42.hyeyoo@gmail.com, chris.p.wilson@intel.com, gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com, max.byungchul.park@gmail.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com, longman@redhat.com, hdanton@sina.com Subject: [PATCH v9 15/25] locking/lockdep, cpu/hotplus: Use a weaker annotation in AP thread Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 17:39:44 +0900 Message-Id: <1675154394-25598-16-git-send-email-max.byungchul.park@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1 In-Reply-To: <1675154394-25598-1-git-send-email-max.byungchul.park@gmail.com> References: <1675154394-25598-1-git-send-email-max.byungchul.park@gmail.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,FREEMAIL_FROM,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org cb92173d1f0 ("locking/lockdep, cpu/hotplug: Annotate AP thread") was introduced to make lockdep_assert_cpus_held() work in AP thread. However, the annotation is too strong for that purpose. We don't have to use more than try lock annotation for that. Furthermore, now that Dept was introduced, false positive alarms was reported by that. Replaced it with try lock annotation. Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park --- kernel/cpu.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c index 6c0a92c..6a9b9c3 100644 --- a/kernel/cpu.c +++ b/kernel/cpu.c @@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ int lockdep_is_cpus_held(void) static void lockdep_acquire_cpus_lock(void) { - rwsem_acquire(&cpu_hotplug_lock.dep_map, 0, 0, _THIS_IP_); + rwsem_acquire(&cpu_hotplug_lock.dep_map, 0, 1, _THIS_IP_); } static void lockdep_release_cpus_lock(void)