Message ID | 1673235231-30302-22-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show
Return-Path: <linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org> X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; helo=out1.vger.email; envelope-from=linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org; receiver=<UNKNOWN>) Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Nr0kL4xZqz23fc for <incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org>; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 15:06:34 +1100 (AEDT) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236910AbjAIEGE (ORCPT <rfc822;incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org>); Sun, 8 Jan 2023 23:06:04 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55158 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236684AbjAIEEa (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>); Sun, 8 Jan 2023 23:04:30 -0500 Received: from lgeamrelo11.lge.com (lgeamrelo11.lge.com [156.147.23.51]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A50A1182E for <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>; Sun, 8 Jan 2023 20:03:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from unknown (HELO lgemrelse6q.lge.com) (156.147.1.121) by 156.147.23.51 with ESMTP; 9 Jan 2023 12:33:54 +0900 X-Original-SENDERIP: 156.147.1.121 X-Original-MAILFROM: byungchul.park@lge.com Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) (10.177.244.38) by 156.147.1.121 with ESMTP; 9 Jan 2023 12:33:54 +0900 X-Original-SENDERIP: 10.177.244.38 X-Original-MAILFROM: byungchul.park@lge.com From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, will@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, joel@joelfernandes.org, sashal@kernel.org, daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch, duyuyang@gmail.com, johannes.berg@intel.com, tj@kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, willy@infradead.org, david@fromorbit.com, amir73il@gmail.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, kernel-team@lge.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@kernel.org, minchan@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, vdavydov.dev@gmail.com, sj@kernel.org, jglisse@redhat.com, dennis@kernel.org, cl@linux.com, penberg@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com, vbabka@suse.cz, ngupta@vflare.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, paolo.valente@linaro.org, josef@toxicpanda.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jack@suse.cz, jlayton@kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, hch@infradead.org, djwong@kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, rodrigosiqueiramelo@gmail.com, melissa.srw@gmail.com, hamohammed.sa@gmail.com, 42.hyeyoo@gmail.com, chris.p.wilson@intel.com, gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com Subject: [PATCH RFC v7 21/23] dept: Apply timeout consideration to hashed-waitqueue wait Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 12:33:49 +0900 Message-Id: <1673235231-30302-22-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1 In-Reply-To: <1673235231-30302-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com> References: <1673235231-30302-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: <linux-ide.vger.kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org |
Series |
DEPT(Dependency Tracker)
|
expand
|
diff --git a/include/linux/wait_bit.h b/include/linux/wait_bit.h index bad30ba..b504815 100644 --- a/include/linux/wait_bit.h +++ b/include/linux/wait_bit.h @@ -247,7 +247,10 @@ struct wait_bit_queue_entry { struct wait_bit_queue_entry __wbq_entry; \ long __ret = ret; /* explicit shadow */ \ \ - sdt_might_sleep_weak(NULL); \ + if (!__ret || __ret == MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT) \ + sdt_might_sleep_weak(NULL); \ + else \ + sdt_might_sleep_weak_timeout(NULL); \ init_wait_var_entry(&__wbq_entry, var, \ exclusive ? WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE : 0); \ for (;;) { \
Now that CONFIG_DEPT_AGGRESSIVE_TIMEOUT_WAIT was introduced, apply the consideration to hashed-waitqueue wait, assuming an input 'ret' in ___wait_var_event() macro is used as a timeout value. Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> --- include/linux/wait_bit.h | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)