Message ID | 1651652269-15342-15-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show
Return-Path: <linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org> X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; helo=out1.vger.email; envelope-from=linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org; receiver=<UNKNOWN>) Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4KtVvf5mptz9sFx for <incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org>; Wed, 4 May 2022 18:52:30 +1000 (AEST) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1347352AbiEDIzE (ORCPT <rfc822;incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org>); Wed, 4 May 2022 04:55:04 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52560 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1346739AbiEDIxY (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 4 May 2022 04:53:24 -0400 Received: from lgeamrelo11.lge.com (lgeamrelo11.lge.com [156.147.23.51]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56588255A0 for <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>; Wed, 4 May 2022 01:49:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unknown (HELO lgeamrelo01.lge.com) (156.147.1.125) by 156.147.23.51 with ESMTP; 4 May 2022 17:19:21 +0900 X-Original-SENDERIP: 156.147.1.125 X-Original-MAILFROM: byungchul.park@lge.com Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) (10.177.244.38) by 156.147.1.125 with ESMTP; 4 May 2022 17:19:21 +0900 X-Original-SENDERIP: 10.177.244.38 X-Original-MAILFROM: byungchul.park@lge.com From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org Cc: damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, will@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, joel@joelfernandes.org, sashal@kernel.org, daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch, chris@chris-wilson.co.uk, duyuyang@gmail.com, johannes.berg@intel.com, tj@kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, willy@infradead.org, david@fromorbit.com, amir73il@gmail.com, bfields@fieldses.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, kernel-team@lge.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@kernel.org, minchan@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, vdavydov.dev@gmail.com, sj@kernel.org, jglisse@redhat.com, dennis@kernel.org, cl@linux.com, penberg@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com, vbabka@suse.cz, ngupta@vflare.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, paolo.valente@linaro.org, josef@toxicpanda.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jack@suse.cz, jack@suse.com, jlayton@kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, hch@infradead.org, djwong@kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, airlied@linux.ie, rodrigosiqueiramelo@gmail.com, melissa.srw@gmail.com, hamohammed.sa@gmail.com, 42.hyeyoo@gmail.com Subject: [PATCH RFC v6 14/21] locking/lockdep, cpu/hotplus: Use a weaker annotation in AP thread Date: Wed, 4 May 2022 17:17:42 +0900 Message-Id: <1651652269-15342-15-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1 In-Reply-To: <1651652269-15342-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com> References: <1651652269-15342-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: <linux-ide.vger.kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org |
Series |
DEPT(Dependency Tracker)
|
expand
|
diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c index d0a9aa0..cb6e66c 100644 --- a/kernel/cpu.c +++ b/kernel/cpu.c @@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ int lockdep_is_cpus_held(void) static void lockdep_acquire_cpus_lock(void) { - rwsem_acquire(&cpu_hotplug_lock.dep_map, 0, 0, _THIS_IP_); + rwsem_acquire(&cpu_hotplug_lock.dep_map, 0, 1, _THIS_IP_); } static void lockdep_release_cpus_lock(void)
cb92173d1f0 ("locking/lockdep, cpu/hotplug: Annotate AP thread") was introduced to make lockdep_assert_cpus_held() work in AP thread. However, the annotation is too strong for that purpose. We don't have to use more than try lock annotation for that. Furthermore, now that Dept was introduced, false positive alarms was reported by that. Replaced it with try lock annotation. Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> --- kernel/cpu.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)