| Message ID | 1499773460-8930-1-git-send-email-horms+renesas@verge.net.au |
|---|---|
| State | Not Applicable |
| Delegated to: | David Miller |
| Headers | show |
On 07/11/2017 02:44 PM, Simon Horman wrote: > Add fallback compatibility string for R-Car Gen 2 and 3. > > In the case of Renesas R-Car hardware we know that there are generations of > SoCs, e.g. Gen 1 and 2. But beyond that its not clear what the relationship > between IP blocks might be. For example, I believe that r8a7790 is older > than r8a7791 but that doesn't imply that the latter is a descendant of the > former or vice versa. > > We can, however, by examining the documentation and behaviour of the > hardware at run-time observe that the current driver implementation appears > to be compatible with the IP blocks on SoCs within a given generation. > > For the above reasons and convenience when enabling new SoCs a > per-generation fallback compatibility string scheme being adopted for > drivers for Renesas SoCs. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au> [...] Acked-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> MBR, Sergei -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au> wrote: > Add fallback compatibility string for R-Car Gen 2 and 3. > > In the case of Renesas R-Car hardware we know that there are generations of > SoCs, e.g. Gen 1 and 2. But beyond that its not clear what the relationship > between IP blocks might be. For example, I believe that r8a7790 is older > than r8a7791 but that doesn't imply that the latter is a descendant of the > former or vice versa. > > We can, however, by examining the documentation and behaviour of the > hardware at run-time observe that the current driver implementation appears > to be compatible with the IP blocks on SoCs within a given generation. > > For the above reasons and convenience when enabling new SoCs a > per-generation fallback compatibility string scheme being adopted for > drivers for Renesas SoCs. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 01:44:20PM +0200, Simon Horman wrote: > Add fallback compatibility string for R-Car Gen 2 and 3. > > In the case of Renesas R-Car hardware we know that there are generations of > SoCs, e.g. Gen 1 and 2. But beyond that its not clear what the relationship > between IP blocks might be. For example, I believe that r8a7790 is older > than r8a7791 but that doesn't imply that the latter is a descendant of the > former or vice versa. > > We can, however, by examining the documentation and behaviour of the > hardware at run-time observe that the current driver implementation appears > to be compatible with the IP blocks on SoCs within a given generation. > > For the above reasons and convenience when enabling new SoCs a > per-generation fallback compatibility string scheme being adopted for > drivers for Renesas SoCs. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au> > --- > Based on libata/for-next > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/sata_rcar.txt | 14 +++++++++++--- > drivers/ata/sata_rcar.c | 8 ++++++++ > 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 01:44:20PM +0200, Simon Horman wrote: > Add fallback compatibility string for R-Car Gen 2 and 3. > > In the case of Renesas R-Car hardware we know that there are generations of > SoCs, e.g. Gen 1 and 2. But beyond that its not clear what the relationship > between IP blocks might be. For example, I believe that r8a7790 is older > than r8a7791 but that doesn't imply that the latter is a descendant of the > former or vice versa. > > We can, however, by examining the documentation and behaviour of the > hardware at run-time observe that the current driver implementation appears > to be compatible with the IP blocks on SoCs within a given generation. > > For the above reasons and convenience when enabling new SoCs a > per-generation fallback compatibility string scheme being adopted for > drivers for Renesas SoCs. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au> Applied to libata/for-4.13-fixes. Thanks.
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/sata_rcar.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/sata_rcar.txt index 0764f9ab63dc..e20eac7a3087 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/sata_rcar.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/sata_rcar.txt @@ -1,14 +1,22 @@ * Renesas R-Car SATA Required properties: -- compatible : should contain one of the following: +- compatible : should contain one or more of the following: - "renesas,sata-r8a7779" for R-Car H1 - ("renesas,rcar-sata" is deprecated) - "renesas,sata-r8a7790-es1" for R-Car H2 ES1 - "renesas,sata-r8a7790" for R-Car H2 other than ES1 - "renesas,sata-r8a7791" for R-Car M2-W - "renesas,sata-r8a7793" for R-Car M2-N - "renesas,sata-r8a7795" for R-Car H3 + - "renesas,rcar-gen2-sata" for a generic R-Car Gen2 compatible device + - "renesas,rcar-gen3-sata" for a generic R-Car Gen3 compatible device + - "renesas,rcar-sata" is deprecated + + When compatible with the generic version nodes + must list the SoC-specific version corresponding + to the platform first followed by the generic + version. + - reg : address and length of the SATA registers; - interrupts : must consist of one interrupt specifier. - clocks : must contain a reference to the functional clock. @@ -16,7 +24,7 @@ Required properties: Example: sata0: sata@ee300000 { - compatible = "renesas,sata-r8a7791"; + compatible = "renesas,sata-r8a7791", "renesas,rcar-gen2-sata"; reg = <0 0xee300000 0 0x2000>; interrupt-parent = <&gic>; interrupts = <0 105 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_rcar.c b/drivers/ata/sata_rcar.c index ee9844758736..537d11869069 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/sata_rcar.c +++ b/drivers/ata/sata_rcar.c @@ -858,6 +858,14 @@ static const struct of_device_id sata_rcar_match[] = { .compatible = "renesas,sata-r8a7795", .data = (void *)RCAR_GEN2_SATA }, + { + .compatible = "renesas,rcar-gen2-sata", + .data = (void *)RCAR_GEN2_SATA + }, + { + .compatible = "renesas,rcar-gen3-sata", + .data = (void *)RCAR_GEN2_SATA + }, { }, }; MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sata_rcar_match);
Add fallback compatibility string for R-Car Gen 2 and 3. In the case of Renesas R-Car hardware we know that there are generations of SoCs, e.g. Gen 1 and 2. But beyond that its not clear what the relationship between IP blocks might be. For example, I believe that r8a7790 is older than r8a7791 but that doesn't imply that the latter is a descendant of the former or vice versa. We can, however, by examining the documentation and behaviour of the hardware at run-time observe that the current driver implementation appears to be compatible with the IP blocks on SoCs within a given generation. For the above reasons and convenience when enabling new SoCs a per-generation fallback compatibility string scheme being adopted for drivers for Renesas SoCs. Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au> --- Based on libata/for-next --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/sata_rcar.txt | 14 +++++++++++--- drivers/ata/sata_rcar.c | 8 ++++++++ 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)