From patchwork Mon Oct 26 15:06:19 2015 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Javier Martinez Canillas X-Patchwork-Id: 536066 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 514AF141352 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 02:06:29 +1100 (AEDT) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751470AbbJZPG1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Oct 2015 11:06:27 -0400 Received: from lists.s-osg.org ([54.187.51.154]:53224 "EHLO lists.s-osg.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751458AbbJZPG1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Oct 2015 11:06:27 -0400 Received: from [10.35.136.81] (unknown [58.123.138.205]) by lists.s-osg.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AEC65462A0; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 08:06:22 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: Enable Cadence driver for ARM64 To: Lee Jones , Wolfram Sang References: <893f828f3ac665d80746589af3617dc462315329.1445868589.git.michal.simek@xilinx.com> <20151026143236.GK597@x1> <20151026144425.GA5588@katana> <20151026150048.GO597@x1> Cc: Michal Simek , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, monstr@monstr.eu, Andrew Bresticker , David Box , Kamal Dasu , Joachim Eastwood , Zhangfei Gao , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Geert Uytterhoeven , Neelesh Gupta , Subhendu Sekhar Behera From: Javier Martinez Canillas Message-ID: <562E416B.8@osg.samsung.com> Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 00:06:19 +0900 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151026150048.GO597@x1> Sender: linux-i2c-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Hello, On 10/27/2015 12:00 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Mon, 26 Oct 2015, Wolfram Sang wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 02:32:36PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: >>> Regarding your address list -- it's too big. Most of your addressees >>> don't care about this patch. Please be more selective when sending >>> patches to people, most of us have enough (relevant) mail as it is. >> >> Probably more effective than to write every user of get_maintainer.pl: >> Patch it to not use git history by default and win the fight ;) > Agreed, coincidentally I was telling people today that get_maintainers.pl only provides a suggestion and that it should not be followed blindly. > Geert wrote to Joe today. Let's see if he can improve things. > What about something like the following patch until Joe writes a more smarter git fallback version? From d6dc34810d24f33afb3c158d519966c1b6167a2f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Javier Martinez Canillas Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 23:46:52 +0900 Subject: [RFC PATCH] get_maintainer: Don't fallback to git by default The get_maintainer.pl script could be used to get a list of people that has to be in the copy list when posting patches for a given file but it defaults to git fallback so the list returned isn't really relevant and submitters are posting patches to random developers that just happened to touch that file in the past. Disable git fallback so get_maintainer.pl only returns the information that is in MAINTAINERS by default. Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas --- scripts/get_maintainer.pl | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/scripts/get_maintainer.pl b/scripts/get_maintainer.pl index 98bae869f6d0..b52ae26270e8 100755 --- a/scripts/get_maintainer.pl +++ b/scripts/get_maintainer.pl @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ my $email_git = 0; my $email_git_all_signature_types = 0; my $email_git_blame = 0; my $email_git_blame_signatures = 1; -my $email_git_fallback = 1; +my $email_git_fallback = 0; my $email_git_min_signatures = 1; my $email_git_max_maintainers = 5; my $email_git_min_percent = 5;