| Message ID | 20220623163136.246404-1-sebastian.reichel@collabora.com |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [1/1] dt-bindings: i2c: i2c-rk3x: add rk3588 compatible | expand |
On 23/06/2022 18:31, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > Just like RK356x, RK3588 is compatible to the existing rk3399 binding. > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.yaml | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) That's still some old tree you are based on... Best regards, Krzysztof
On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 10:22:09PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 23/06/2022 18:31, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > > Just like RK356x, RK3588 is compatible to the existing rk3399 binding. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com> > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.yaml | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > That's still some old tree you are based on... What do you mean by that?
On 06/07/2022 21:34, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 10:22:09PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 23/06/2022 18:31, Sebastian Reichel wrote: >>> Just like RK356x, RK3588 is compatible to the existing rk3399 binding. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com> >>> --- >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.yaml | 1 + >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> That's still some old tree you are based on... > > What do you mean by that? The patch was sent to not updated email, so I assume it was based on something before v5.18. Could be relevant, could be not, but it raises a question what was a base this (and other Rockchip) series. :) Best regards, Krzysztof
Hi, On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 09:55:27PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 06/07/2022 21:34, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 10:22:09PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> On 23/06/2022 18:31, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > >>> Just like RK356x, RK3588 is compatible to the existing rk3399 binding. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com> > >>> --- > >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.yaml | 1 + > >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > >> > >> That's still some old tree you are based on... > > > > What do you mean by that? > > The patch was sent to not updated email, so I assume it was based on > something before v5.18. Could be relevant, could be not, but it raises a > question what was a base this (and other Rockchip) series. :) The last round of rk3588 patches (incl. this one) are based on v5.19-rc1, but mail destinations are not (I do not generate the mail destinations fully automatic). -- Sebastian
On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 06:31:36PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > Just like RK356x, RK3588 is compatible to the existing rk3399 binding. > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com> Applied to for-next, thanks!
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.yaml index 5339dd4fc370..2f79f6d57e2d 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.yaml @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ properties: - rockchip,rk3308-i2c - rockchip,rk3328-i2c - rockchip,rk3568-i2c + - rockchip,rk3588-i2c - const: rockchip,rk3399-i2c reg:
Just like RK356x, RK3588 is compatible to the existing rk3399 binding. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com> --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.yaml | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)