diff mbox series

gpio: zynq: fix reference leak in zynq_gpio functions

Message ID 20201127094445.121232-1-miaoqinglang@huawei.com
State New
Headers show
Series gpio: zynq: fix reference leak in zynq_gpio functions | expand

Commit Message

Qinglang Miao Nov. 27, 2020, 9:44 a.m. UTC
pm_runtime_get_sync will increment pm usage counter even it
failed. Forgetting to putting operation will result in a
reference leak here.

A new function pm_runtime_resume_and_get is introduced in
[0] to keep usage counter balanced. So We fix the reference
leak by replacing it with new funtion.

[0] dd8088d5a896 ("PM: runtime: Add  pm_runtime_resume_and_get to deal with usage counter")

Fixes: c2df3de0d07e ("gpio: zynq: properly support runtime PM for GPIO used as interrupts")
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Qinglang Miao <miaoqinglang@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Bartosz Golaszewski Nov. 30, 2020, 4:44 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 10:40 AM Qinglang Miao <miaoqinglang@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> pm_runtime_get_sync will increment pm usage counter even it
> failed. Forgetting to putting operation will result in a
> reference leak here.
>
> A new function pm_runtime_resume_and_get is introduced in
> [0] to keep usage counter balanced. So We fix the reference
> leak by replacing it with new funtion.
>
> [0] dd8088d5a896 ("PM: runtime: Add  pm_runtime_resume_and_get to deal with usage counter")

Is this upstream yet?

Bartosz
Qinglang Miao Dec. 1, 2020, 1:23 a.m. UTC | #2
在 2020/12/1 0:44, Bartosz Golaszewski 写道:
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 10:40 AM Qinglang Miao <miaoqinglang@huawei.com> wrote:
>>
>> pm_runtime_get_sync will increment pm usage counter even it
>> failed. Forgetting to putting operation will result in a
>> reference leak here.
>>
>> A new function pm_runtime_resume_and_get is introduced in
>> [0] to keep usage counter balanced. So We fix the reference
>> leak by replacing it with new funtion.
>>
>> [0] dd8088d5a896 ("PM: runtime: Add  pm_runtime_resume_and_get to deal with usage counter")
> 
> Is this upstream yet?
> 
> Bartosz
> .
Yep, it's introduced in v5.10-rc5
>
Bartosz Golaszewski Dec. 2, 2020, 9:45 a.m. UTC | #3
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 10:40 AM Qinglang Miao <miaoqinglang@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> pm_runtime_get_sync will increment pm usage counter even it
> failed. Forgetting to putting operation will result in a
> reference leak here.
>
> A new function pm_runtime_resume_and_get is introduced in
> [0] to keep usage counter balanced. So We fix the reference
> leak by replacing it with new funtion.
>
> [0] dd8088d5a896 ("PM: runtime: Add  pm_runtime_resume_and_get to deal with usage counter")
>
> Fixes: c2df3de0d07e ("gpio: zynq: properly support runtime PM for GPIO used as interrupts")
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Qinglang Miao <miaoqinglang@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c
> index 0b5a17ab9..3521c1dc3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c
> @@ -574,7 +574,7 @@ static int zynq_gpio_irq_reqres(struct irq_data *d)
>         struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
>         int ret;
>
> -       ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(chip->parent);
> +       ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(chip->parent);
>         if (ret < 0)
>                 return ret;
>
> @@ -942,7 +942,7 @@ static int zynq_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
>         pm_runtime_set_active(&pdev->dev);
>         pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
> -       ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
> +       ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(&pdev->dev);
>         if (ret < 0)
>                 goto err_pm_dis;
>
> --
> 2.23.0
>

Applied, thanks!

Bartosz
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c
index 0b5a17ab9..3521c1dc3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c
@@ -574,7 +574,7 @@  static int zynq_gpio_irq_reqres(struct irq_data *d)
 	struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
 	int ret;
 
-	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(chip->parent);
+	ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(chip->parent);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
@@ -942,7 +942,7 @@  static int zynq_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	pm_runtime_set_active(&pdev->dev);
 	pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
-	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
+	ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(&pdev->dev);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto err_pm_dis;