[16/23] gpio: mockup: refactor the module init function

From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>

This is in preparation for dynamically created chips.

Let's split out the code that can be reused when creating chips at
run-time. Let's also move the code preparing the device properties into
a separate routine. This has the advantage of simplifying the error
handling.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-mockup.c | 165 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 90 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)

On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 05:45:40PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
> 
> This is in preparation for dynamically created chips.
> 
> Let's split out the code that can be reused when creating chips at
> run-time. Let's also move the code preparing the device properties into
> a separate routine. This has the advantage of simplifying the error
> handling.

Almost all contents of this patch should go to proposed helper as I mentioned
before. Will make this patch quite small and understandable.

> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-mockup.c | 165 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 90 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mockup.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mockup.c
> index 995e37fef9c5..eb94ddac5fee 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mockup.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mockup.c
> @@ -524,16 +524,78 @@ static __init char **gpio_mockup_make_line_names(const char *label,
>  	return names;
>  }
>  
> -static int __init gpio_mockup_init(void)
> +static int __init gpio_mockup_register_device(struct property_entry *properties)
>  {
> -	struct property_entry properties[GPIO_MOCKUP_MAX_PROP];
> -	char chip_label[GPIO_MOCKUP_LABEL_SIZE];
>  	struct gpio_mockup_device *mockup_dev;
> -	int i, prop, num_chips, err = 0, base;
>  	struct platform_device_info pdevinfo;
> -	char **line_names;
> +
> +	memset(&pdevinfo, 0, sizeof(pdevinfo));
> +
> +	mockup_dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*mockup_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!mockup_dev)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	pdevinfo.name = "gpio-mockup";
> +	pdevinfo.properties = properties;
> +
> +	pdevinfo.id = ida_alloc(&gpio_mockup_ida, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (pdevinfo.id < 0) {
> +		kfree(mockup_dev);
> +		return pdevinfo.id;
> +	}
> +
> +	mockup_dev->pdev = platform_device_register_full(&pdevinfo);
> +	if (IS_ERR(mockup_dev->pdev)) {
> +		ida_free(&gpio_mockup_ida, pdevinfo.id);
> +		kfree(mockup_dev);
> +		return PTR_ERR(mockup_dev->pdev);
> +	}
> +
> +	list_add(&mockup_dev->list, &gpio_mockup_devices);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int __init gpio_mockup_register_one_chip_from_params(int idx)
> +{
> +	char chip_label[GPIO_MOCKUP_LABEL_SIZE], **line_names = NULL;
> +	struct property_entry properties[GPIO_MOCKUP_MAX_PROP];
> +	int prop = 0, base, ret;
>  	u16 ngpio;
>  
> +	memset(properties, 0, sizeof(properties));
> +
> +	snprintf(chip_label, sizeof(chip_label), "gpio-mockup-%c", idx + 'A');
> +	properties[prop++] = PROPERTY_ENTRY_STRING("chip-label",
> +						   chip_label);
> +
> +	base = gpio_mockup_range_base(idx);
> +	if (base >= 0)
> +		properties[prop++] = PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32("gpio-base",
> +							base);
> +
> +	ngpio = base < 0 ? gpio_mockup_range_ngpio(idx)
> +			 : gpio_mockup_range_ngpio(idx) - base;
> +	properties[prop++] = PROPERTY_ENTRY_U16("nr-gpios", ngpio);
> +
> +	if (gpio_mockup_named_lines) {
> +		line_names = gpio_mockup_make_line_names(chip_label, ngpio);
> +		if (!line_names)
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +		properties[prop++] = PROPERTY_ENTRY_STRING_ARRAY_LEN(
> +					"gpio-line-names", line_names, ngpio);
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = gpio_mockup_register_device(properties);
> +	kfree_strarray(line_names, ngpio);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int __init gpio_mockup_register_chips_from_params(void)
> +{
> +	int num_chips, i, ret;
> +
>  	if ((gpio_mockup_num_ranges < 2) ||
>  	    (gpio_mockup_num_ranges % 2) ||
>  	    (gpio_mockup_num_ranges > GPIO_MOCKUP_MAX_RANGES))
> @@ -551,86 +613,39 @@ static int __init gpio_mockup_init(void)
>  			return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	gpio_mockup_dbg_dir = debugfs_create_dir("gpio-mockup", NULL);
> -
> -	err = platform_driver_register(&gpio_mockup_driver);
> -	if (err) {
> -		pr_err("error registering platform driver\n");
> -		debugfs_remove_recursive(gpio_mockup_dbg_dir);
> -		return err;
> -	}
> -
>  	for (i = 0; i < num_chips; i++) {
> -		memset(properties, 0, sizeof(properties));
> -		memset(&pdevinfo, 0, sizeof(pdevinfo));
> -		prop = 0;
> -		line_names = NULL;
> -
> -		snprintf(chip_label, sizeof(chip_label),
> -			 "gpio-mockup-%c", i + 'A');
> -		properties[prop++] = PROPERTY_ENTRY_STRING("chip-label",
> -							   chip_label);
> -
> -		base = gpio_mockup_range_base(i);
> -		if (base >= 0)
> -			properties[prop++] = PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32("gpio-base",
> -								base);
> -
> -		ngpio = base < 0 ? gpio_mockup_range_ngpio(i)
> -				 : gpio_mockup_range_ngpio(i) - base;
> -		properties[prop++] = PROPERTY_ENTRY_U16("nr-gpios", ngpio);
> -
> -		if (gpio_mockup_named_lines) {
> -			line_names = gpio_mockup_make_line_names(chip_label,
> -								 ngpio);
> -			if (!line_names) {
> -				err = -ENOMEM;
> -				goto err_out;
> -			}
> -
> -			properties[prop++] = PROPERTY_ENTRY_STRING_ARRAY_LEN(
> -						"gpio-line-names",
> -						line_names, ngpio);
> +		ret = gpio_mockup_register_one_chip_from_params(i);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			gpio_mockup_unregister_devices();
> +			return ret;
>  		}
> +	}
>  
> -		pdevinfo.name = "gpio-mockup";
> -		pdevinfo.properties = properties;
> +	return 0;
> +}
>  
> -		pdevinfo.id = ida_alloc(&gpio_mockup_ida, GFP_KERNEL);
> -		if (pdevinfo.id < 0) {
> -			kfree_strarray(line_names, ngpio);
> -			err = pdevinfo.id;
> -			goto err_out;
> -		}
> +static int __init gpio_mockup_init(void)
> +{
> +	int ret;
>  
> -		mockup_dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*mockup_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
> -		if (!mockup_dev) {
> -			kfree_strarray(line_names, ngpio);
> -			ida_free(&gpio_mockup_ida, pdevinfo.id);
> -			err = -ENOMEM;
> -			goto err_out;
> -		}
> +	gpio_mockup_dbg_dir = debugfs_create_dir("gpio-mockup", NULL);
>  
> -		mockup_dev->pdev = platform_device_register_full(&pdevinfo);
> -		kfree_strarray(line_names, ngpio);
> -		if (IS_ERR(mockup_dev->pdev)) {
> -			pr_err("error registering device");
> -			ida_free(&gpio_mockup_ida, pdevinfo.id);
> -			kfree(mockup_dev);
> -			err = PTR_ERR(mockup_dev->pdev);
> -			goto err_out;
> -		}
> +	ret = platform_driver_register(&gpio_mockup_driver);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		pr_err("error registering platform driver\n");
> +		debugfs_remove_recursive(gpio_mockup_dbg_dir);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
>  
> -		list_add(&mockup_dev->list, &gpio_mockup_devices);
> +	ret = gpio_mockup_register_chips_from_params();
> +	if (ret) {
> +		pr_err("error registering device");
> +		debugfs_remove_recursive(gpio_mockup_dbg_dir);
> +		platform_driver_unregister(&gpio_mockup_driver);
> +		return ret;
>  	}
>  
>  	return 0;
> -
> -err_out:
> -	platform_driver_unregister(&gpio_mockup_driver);
> -	gpio_mockup_unregister_devices();
> -	debugfs_remove_recursive(gpio_mockup_dbg_dir);
> -	return err;
>  }
>  
>  static void __exit gpio_mockup_exit(void)
> -- 
> 2.26.1
>

On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 6:57 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 05:45:40PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
> >
> > This is in preparation for dynamically created chips.
> >
> > Let's split out the code that can be reused when creating chips at
> > run-time. Let's also move the code preparing the device properties into
> > a separate routine. This has the advantage of simplifying the error
> > handling.
>
> Almost all contents of this patch should go to proposed helper as I mentioned
> before. Will make this patch quite small and understandable.
>

Sorry, I'm not sure what you're referring to.

Bart

On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 01:05:54PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 6:57 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 05:45:40PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
> > >
> > > This is in preparation for dynamically created chips.
> > >
> > > Let's split out the code that can be reused when creating chips at
> > > run-time. Let's also move the code preparing the device properties into
> > > a separate routine. This has the advantage of simplifying the error
> > > handling.
> >
> > Almost all contents of this patch should go to proposed helper as I mentioned
> > before. Will make this patch quite small and understandable.

> Sorry, I'm not sure what you're referring to.

I meant if you move changes done here to the patch where I complained about
indentation you might have better series. Have you considered that?