| Message ID | 1438680203-13432-7-git-send-email-mpa@pengutronix.de |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Markus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de> wrote: > Add some information about gpio names to the debugfs gpio file. name and > label of a GPIO are then displayed next to each other. This way it is > easy to see what the real name of GPIO is and what the driver requested > it for. > > Signed-off-by: Markus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de> This patch looks correct in the context. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Markus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de> wrote: > >> Add some information about gpio names to the debugfs gpio file. name and >> label of a GPIO are then displayed next to each other. This way it is >> easy to see what the real name of GPIO is and what the driver requested >> it for. >> >> Signed-off-by: Markus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de> > > This patch looks correct in the context. Looks correct indeed, but on a related note one might question the need to have both a "name" and a "label" for a GPIO? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Markus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de> wrote: >> >>> Add some information about gpio names to the debugfs gpio file. name and >>> label of a GPIO are then displayed next to each other. This way it is >>> easy to see what the real name of GPIO is and what the driver requested >>> it for. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Markus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de> >> >> This patch looks correct in the context. > > Looks correct indeed, but on a related note one might question the > need to have both a "name" and a "label" for a GPIO? The way I see it a certain GPIO controller has names for the GPIO lines, like gpio0,1,2...n, while the label is for the actual use of the GPIO line. It's a bit like the regulator name, rail name and consumer endpoints guess. Just we only have two names, not three :P Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c index edfeb0485112..926a1507431f 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c @@ -2307,14 +2307,19 @@ static void gpiolib_dbg_show(struct seq_file *s, struct gpio_chip *chip) int is_irq; for (i = 0; i < chip->ngpio; i++, gpio++, gdesc++) { - if (!test_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &gdesc->flags)) + if (!test_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &gdesc->flags)) { + if (gdesc->name) { + seq_printf(s, " gpio-%-3d (%-20.20s)\n", + gpio, gdesc->name); + } continue; + } gpiod_get_direction(gdesc); is_out = test_bit(FLAG_IS_OUT, &gdesc->flags); is_irq = test_bit(FLAG_USED_AS_IRQ, &gdesc->flags); - seq_printf(s, " gpio-%-3d (%-20.20s) %s %s %s", - gpio, gdesc->label, + seq_printf(s, " gpio-%-3d (%-20.20s|%-20.20s) %s %s %s", + gpio, gdesc->name ? gdesc->name : "", gdesc->label, is_out ? "out" : "in ", chip->get ? (chip->get(chip, i) ? "hi" : "lo")
Add some information about gpio names to the debugfs gpio file. name and label of a GPIO are then displayed next to each other. This way it is easy to see what the real name of GPIO is and what the driver requested it for. Signed-off-by: Markus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de> --- drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 11 ++++++++--- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)