Message ID | 20210209171235.20624-2-eajames@linux.ibm.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show
Return-Path: <linux-fsi-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org> X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DZqGS3Wzjz9sVm for <incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org>; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 04:13:04 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=SRlQ3Fi4; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DZqGR5KF3zDsn2 for <incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org>; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 04:13:03 +1100 (AEDT) X-Original-To: linux-fsi@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linux-fsi@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=eajames@linux.ibm.com; receiver=<UNKNOWN>) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=SRlQ3Fi4; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DZqGL3tLTzDskP for <linux-fsi@lists.ozlabs.org>; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 04:12:58 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 119HAYGh129410; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 12:12:56 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=wJ//Omqv/AAT6eCOvqmQAss00CDe5qV9MLuhq8HpxPs=; b=SRlQ3Fi4uet0tJdp5LF9I9ahjNtRynvyHYERqp7dnNn17SNz9C7PqBcZ8tv4HnSuD4Z5 d49l0VlpnwQxl7dnZswD/kTcoaHq7gr2tfSLG3reTDtH9cRu+WblbZDkTuJEx5uRTE5r JzsEsT1OTCH8ev8MELU/iTYK4rxRQ8NvlXBjVL7PGzBjz1MzVIwRjV8j/mNF2tk9eesj GEd3wSCJPDftvF6kbR40iJClaz0dV9JeUOwWcdZY/LjIDiINH8gRdGTq/h+6JTi1g4QZ uFPCab7KStKg9FRu3KE3fy/dtKLWVaD3LkaGrqmYEnbgqNDNW9wVScB1rq86FywV5NjB MA== Received: from ppma04wdc.us.ibm.com (1a.90.2fa9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.47.144.26]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 36kx5hh3ek-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 09 Feb 2021 12:12:55 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04wdc.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 119GvUO8026169; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 17:12:53 GMT Received: from b01cxnp22036.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp22036.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.26]) by ppma04wdc.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 36hjr981uc-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 09 Feb 2021 17:12:53 +0000 Received: from b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.110]) by b01cxnp22036.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 119HCrhZ6881972 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 9 Feb 2021 17:12:53 GMT Received: from b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23A4CAE05F; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 17:12:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDC54AE05C; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 17:12:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from v0005c16.aus.stglabs.ibm.com (unknown [9.163.58.95]) by b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 17:12:51 +0000 (GMT) From: Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com> To: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 1/4] fsi: occ: Don't accept response from un-initialized OCC Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 11:12:32 -0600 Message-Id: <20210209171235.20624-2-eajames@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: <20210209171235.20624-1-eajames@linux.ibm.com> References: <20210209171235.20624-1-eajames@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.369, 18.0.737 definitions=2021-02-09_05:2021-02-09, 2021-02-09 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1015 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2102090082 X-BeenThere: linux-fsi@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: <linux-fsi.lists.ozlabs.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/options/linux-fsi>, <mailto:linux-fsi-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linux-fsi/> List-Post: <mailto:linux-fsi@lists.ozlabs.org> List-Help: <mailto:linux-fsi-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linux-fsi>, <mailto:linux-fsi-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe> Cc: jdelvare@suse.com, alistair@popple.id.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsi@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linux-fsi-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "linux-fsi" <linux-fsi-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org> |
Series |
occ: fsi and hwmon: Fixes for polling un-initialized OCC
|
expand
|
diff --git a/drivers/fsi/fsi-occ.c b/drivers/fsi/fsi-occ.c index 10ca2e290655..cb05b6dacc9d 100644 --- a/drivers/fsi/fsi-occ.c +++ b/drivers/fsi/fsi-occ.c @@ -495,6 +495,7 @@ int fsi_occ_submit(struct device *dev, const void *request, size_t req_len, goto done; if (resp->return_status == OCC_RESP_CMD_IN_PRG || + resp->return_status == OCC_RESP_CRIT_INIT || resp->seq_no != seq_no) { rc = -ETIMEDOUT;
If the OCC is not initialized and responds as such, the driver should continue waiting for a valid response until the timeout expires. Signed-off-by: Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com> --- drivers/fsi/fsi-occ.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)