diff mbox series

[RFC,02/10] mm/hmm: Remove dead check for HugeTLB and FS DAX

Message ID e4a877d1f77d778a2e820b9df66f6b7422bf2276.1712796818.git-series.apopple@nvidia.com
State New
Headers show
Series fs/dax: Fix FS DAX page reference counts | expand

Commit Message

Alistair Popple April 11, 2024, 12:57 a.m. UTC
pud_huge() returns true only for a HugeTLB page. pud_devmap() is only
used by FS DAX pages. These two things are mutually exclusive so this
code is dead code and can be removed.

Signed-off-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
---
 mm/hmm.c | 33 ---------------------------------
 1 file changed, 33 deletions(-)

Comments

Jason Gunthorpe April 11, 2024, 12:25 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 10:57:23AM +1000, Alistair Popple wrote:
> pud_huge() returns true only for a HugeTLB page. pud_devmap() is only
> used by FS DAX pages. These two things are mutually exclusive so this
> code is dead code and can be removed.

I'm not sure this is true.. pud_huge() is mostly a misspelling of pud_leaf()..

> -	if (pud_huge(pud) && pud_devmap(pud)) {

I suspect this should be written as:

   if (pud_leaf(pud) && pud_devmap(pud)) {

In line with Peter's work here:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20240321220802.679544-1-peterx@redhat.com/

Jason
Peter Xu April 11, 2024, 1:37 p.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 09:25:30AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 10:57:23AM +1000, Alistair Popple wrote:
> > pud_huge() returns true only for a HugeTLB page. pud_devmap() is only
> > used by FS DAX pages. These two things are mutually exclusive so this
> > code is dead code and can be removed.
> 
> I'm not sure this is true.. pud_huge() is mostly a misspelling of pud_leaf()..
> 
> > -	if (pud_huge(pud) && pud_devmap(pud)) {
> 
> I suspect this should be written as:
> 
>    if (pud_leaf(pud) && pud_devmap(pud)) {
> 
> In line with Peter's work here:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20240321220802.679544-1-peterx@redhat.com/

Just to provide more information for Alistair, this patch already switched
that over to a _leaf():

https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240318200404.448346-12-peterx@redhat.com

That's in mm-unstable now, so should see that in a rebase.

And btw it's great to see that pxx_devmap() can go away.

Thanks,
Alistair Popple April 12, 2024, 1:28 a.m. UTC | #3
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> writes:

> On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 09:25:30AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 10:57:23AM +1000, Alistair Popple wrote:
>> > pud_huge() returns true only for a HugeTLB page. pud_devmap() is only
>> > used by FS DAX pages. These two things are mutually exclusive so this
>> > code is dead code and can be removed.
>> 
>> I'm not sure this is true.. pud_huge() is mostly a misspelling of pud_leaf()..
>> 
>> > -	if (pud_huge(pud) && pud_devmap(pud)) {
>> 
>> I suspect this should be written as:
>> 
>>    if (pud_leaf(pud) && pud_devmap(pud)) {

Oh that makes a lot more sense. I'd taken the comment for pud_huge() at
face value (ie. that it's a hugetlbfs page) without digging further.

>> In line with Peter's work here:
>> 
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20240321220802.679544-1-peterx@redhat.com/
>
> Just to provide more information for Alistair, this patch already switched
> that over to a _leaf():

Got it, thanks (and apologies for missing my Cc on that).

> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240318200404.448346-12-peterx@redhat.com
>
> That's in mm-unstable now, so should see that in a rebase.
>
> And btw it's great to see that pxx_devmap() can go away.

Yep, AFAICT pxx_devmap only exists to do this special FS DAX
refcounting. Once that is fixed it can go away.

> Thanks,
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c
index 277ddca..5bbfb0e 100644
--- a/mm/hmm.c
+++ b/mm/hmm.c
@@ -411,9 +411,6 @@  static inline unsigned long pud_to_hmm_pfn_flags(struct hmm_range *range,
 static int hmm_vma_walk_pud(pud_t *pudp, unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
 		struct mm_walk *walk)
 {
-	struct hmm_vma_walk *hmm_vma_walk = walk->private;
-	struct hmm_range *range = hmm_vma_walk->range;
-	unsigned long addr = start;
 	pud_t pud;
 	spinlock_t *ptl = pud_trans_huge_lock(pudp, walk->vma);
 
@@ -429,39 +426,9 @@  static int hmm_vma_walk_pud(pud_t *pudp, unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
 		return hmm_vma_walk_hole(start, end, -1, walk);
 	}
 
-	if (pud_huge(pud) && pud_devmap(pud)) {
-		unsigned long i, npages, pfn;
-		unsigned int required_fault;
-		unsigned long *hmm_pfns;
-		unsigned long cpu_flags;
-
-		if (!pud_present(pud)) {
-			spin_unlock(ptl);
-			return hmm_vma_walk_hole(start, end, -1, walk);
-		}
-
-		i = (addr - range->start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
-		npages = (end - addr) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
-		hmm_pfns = &range->hmm_pfns[i];
-
-		cpu_flags = pud_to_hmm_pfn_flags(range, pud);
-		required_fault = hmm_range_need_fault(hmm_vma_walk, hmm_pfns,
-						      npages, cpu_flags);
-		if (required_fault) {
-			spin_unlock(ptl);
-			return hmm_vma_fault(addr, end, required_fault, walk);
-		}
-
-		pfn = pud_pfn(pud) + ((addr & ~PUD_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
-		for (i = 0; i < npages; ++i, ++pfn)
-			hmm_pfns[i] = pfn | cpu_flags;
-		goto out_unlock;
-	}
-
 	/* Ask for the PUD to be split */
 	walk->action = ACTION_SUBTREE;
 
-out_unlock:
 	spin_unlock(ptl);
 	return 0;
 }