diff mbox series

[4/4] ext4: remove the special buffer dirty handling in do_journal_get_write_access

Message ID 20240830053739.3588573-5-zhangshida@kylinos.cn
State Awaiting Upstream
Headers show
Series Fix an error caused by improperly dirtied buffer | expand

Commit Message

zhangshida Aug. 30, 2024, 5:37 a.m. UTC
From: Shida Zhang <zhangshida@kylinos.cn>

This kinda revert the commit 56d35a4cd13e("ext4: Fix dirtying of
journalled buffers in data=journal mode") made by Jan 14 years ago,
since the do_get_write_access() itself can deal with the extra
unexpected buf dirting things in a proper way now.

Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Shida Zhang <zhangshida@kylinos.cn>
---
 fs/ext4/inode.c | 18 +-----------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 17 deletions(-)

Comments

Jan Kara Sept. 2, 2024, 1:35 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri 30-08-24 13:37:39, zhangshida wrote:
> From: Shida Zhang <zhangshida@kylinos.cn>
> 
> This kinda revert the commit 56d35a4cd13e("ext4: Fix dirtying of
> journalled buffers in data=journal mode") made by Jan 14 years ago,
> since the do_get_write_access() itself can deal with the extra
> unexpected buf dirting things in a proper way now.
> 
> Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> Signed-off-by: Shida Zhang <zhangshida@kylinos.cn>

Looks good. Feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

								Honza

> ---
>  fs/ext4/inode.c | 18 +-----------------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> index a28f279fd02f..2687bf451a25 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> @@ -1023,27 +1023,11 @@ static int ext4_dirty_journalled_data(handle_t *handle, struct buffer_head *bh)
>  int do_journal_get_write_access(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
>  				struct buffer_head *bh)
>  {
> -	int dirty = buffer_dirty(bh);
> -	int ret;
> -
>  	if (!buffer_mapped(bh) || buffer_freed(bh))
>  		return 0;
> -	/*
> -	 * ext4_block_write_begin() could have dirtied some buffers. Clean
> -	 * the dirty bit as jbd2_journal_get_write_access() could complain
> -	 * otherwise about fs integrity issues. Setting of the dirty bit
> -	 * by ext4_block_write_begin() isn't a real problem here as we clear
> -	 * the bit before releasing a page lock and thus writeback cannot
> -	 * ever write the buffer.
> -	 */
> -	if (dirty)
> -		clear_buffer_dirty(bh);
>  	BUFFER_TRACE(bh, "get write access");
> -	ret = ext4_journal_get_write_access(handle, inode->i_sb, bh,
> +	return ext4_journal_get_write_access(handle, inode->i_sb, bh,
>  					    EXT4_JTR_NONE);
> -	if (!ret && dirty)
> -		ret = ext4_dirty_journalled_data(handle, bh);
> -	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  int ext4_block_write_begin(handle_t *handle, struct folio *folio,
> -- 
> 2.33.0
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index a28f279fd02f..2687bf451a25 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -1023,27 +1023,11 @@  static int ext4_dirty_journalled_data(handle_t *handle, struct buffer_head *bh)
 int do_journal_get_write_access(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
 				struct buffer_head *bh)
 {
-	int dirty = buffer_dirty(bh);
-	int ret;
-
 	if (!buffer_mapped(bh) || buffer_freed(bh))
 		return 0;
-	/*
-	 * ext4_block_write_begin() could have dirtied some buffers. Clean
-	 * the dirty bit as jbd2_journal_get_write_access() could complain
-	 * otherwise about fs integrity issues. Setting of the dirty bit
-	 * by ext4_block_write_begin() isn't a real problem here as we clear
-	 * the bit before releasing a page lock and thus writeback cannot
-	 * ever write the buffer.
-	 */
-	if (dirty)
-		clear_buffer_dirty(bh);
 	BUFFER_TRACE(bh, "get write access");
-	ret = ext4_journal_get_write_access(handle, inode->i_sb, bh,
+	return ext4_journal_get_write_access(handle, inode->i_sb, bh,
 					    EXT4_JTR_NONE);
-	if (!ret && dirty)
-		ret = ext4_dirty_journalled_data(handle, bh);
-	return ret;
 }
 
 int ext4_block_write_begin(handle_t *handle, struct folio *folio,